Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
CSB Meeting Leading and Lagging Indicator Indicator  Metrics

CSB Meeting Leading and Lagging Indicator Indicator  Metrics

Ratings: (0)|Views: 0 |Likes:
Published by Josiph Bukair

More info:

Published by: Josiph Bukair on Dec 17, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/14/2014

pdf

text

original

 
7/19/20121
CSB
 
MeetingCSB
 
MeetingLeading
 
and
 
Leading
 
and
 
Lagg ng
 
In cator
 
Lagg ng
 
In cator
 
MetricsMetrics
Houston, TX July 23, 2012Houston, TX July 23, 2012
CSB’s
 
RequestCSB’s
 
Request
The
 
USW
 
and
 
API
 
were
 
identified
 
in
 
a
 
ANSI
 
 based
 
standard
 
to
 
identify
 
leading
 
and
 
lagging
 
indicators
 
for
 
use
 
in
 
the
 
refinery
 
and
 
petrochemical
 
industries
 
public
 
reporting
 
as
 
well
 
as
 
use
 
at
 
individual
 
facilities
2
 
7/19/20122
CSB’s
 
RequestCSB’s
 
Request
Committee
 
 be
 
open,
 
 balanced,
 
use
 
due
 
process
 
Diverse
 
representatives
 
from
 
industry,
 
labor,
 
government,
 
public
 
interest,
 
environmental,
 
experts
 
and
 
scientific
 
organizations
 
and
 
3
A
 
Better
 
Process
 
and
 
OutcomeA
 
Better
 
Process
 
and
 
Outcome
1. USW
 
view
 
of
 
how
 
the
 
process
 
did
 
not
 
function
 
2. The
 
current
 
RP
 
failed
 
to
 
meet
 
the
 
CSB
 
recommendations
 
– and
 
more
 
importantly
 
it
 
will
 
not
 
make
 
a
 
meaningful
 
impact
 
on
 
the
 
industry.
 
improvements,
 
changes
 
need
 
to
 
 be
 
made
 
in
 
 both
 
measuring
 
and
 
reporting4. Proposals
 
for
 
moving
 
forward
4
 
7/19/20123
Consensus?Consensus?
onsensus
 
nee s
 
o
 
e
 
among
 
e
 
s a e o ers
 
identified
 
 by
 
the
 
CSB
 
(industry,
 
labor,
 
government,
 
public
 
interest,
 
environmental)
A
 
representative
 
stakeholder
 
process
 
would
 
prec u e
 
n ustry
 
rom
 
cons stent y
 
om nat ng
 
and
 
outvoting
 
other
 
stakeholders
 
– a
 
strange
 
notion
 
of
 
consensus
5
Consensus?Consensus?
 
does
 
not
 
work,
 
especially
 
when
 
meetings
 
are
 
consistently
 
dominated
 
 by
 
industry
No
 
stakeholders
 
should
 
 be
 
allowed
 
to
 
game
 
the
 
representatives
 
at
 
the
 
table
6

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->