CREATION • Compromises
3
The big picture
by Ken HamFirst published in:
Creation
23(2):16–18March–May 2001
The world’s press was watching and listening in 1925 when, at the famous Scopes Trial
1
in Dayton,Tennessee, William Jennings Bryan (seen as the man representing Christianity) was cross-examinedabout his faith.Part of the dialogue went as follows:Clarence Darrow (the ACLU lawyer): ‘Mr Bryan, could you tell me how old the Earth is?’Bryan: ‘No, sir, I couldn’t.’D: ‘Could you come anywhere near it?’B: ‘I wouldn’t attempt to. I could possibly come as near as the scientists do, but I had rather be moreaccurate before I give a guess.’ …D: ‘Does the statement, “The morning and the evening were the rst day,” and “The morning andthe evening were the second day,” mean anything to you?’B: ‘I do not think it necessarily means a twenty-four-hour day.’D: ‘You do not?’B: ‘No.’ …D: ‘Then, when the Bible said, for instance, “and God called the rmament heaven. And the eveningand the morning were the second day,” that does not necessarily mean twenty-four-hours?’B: ‘I do not think it necessarily does.’ … ‘I think it would be just as easy for the kind of God webelieve in to make the Earth in six days as in six years or in six million years or in 600 million years. Ido not think it important whether we believe one or the other.’D: ‘And they had the evening and the morning before that time for three days or three periods. Allright, that settles it. Now, if you call those periods, they may have been a very long time.’B: ‘They might have been.’D: ‘The creation might have been going on for a very long time?’B: ‘It might have continued for millions of years.’
Right there, I believe, Darrow knew he had ‘won’ the trial in the public mind! As a humanist, Darrow knew that the language of Genesis 1 was clear, and taught that God created in six literal days. But
Leave a Comment