Increasing Small Arms Lethality In Afghanistan: Taking Back The Infantry Half-Kilometer
5/5
()
About this ebook
Comments from returning non-commissioned officers and officers reveal that about fifty percent of engagements occur past 300 meters. The enemy tactics are to engage United States forces from high ground with medium and heavy weapons, often including mortars, knowing that we are restricted by our equipment limitations and the inability of our overburdened soldiers to maneuver at elevations exceeding 6000 feet. Current equipment, training, and doctrine are optimized for engagements under 300 meters and on level terrain
There are several ways to extend the lethality of the infantry. A more effective 5.56-mm bullet can be designed which provides enhanced terminal performance out to 500 meters. A better option to increase incapacitation is to adopt a larger caliber cartridge, which will function using components of the M16/M4. The 2006 study by the Joint Service Wound Ballistics-Integrated Product Team discovered that the ideal caliber seems to be between 6.5 and 7-mm. This was also the general conclusion of all military ballistics studies since the end of World War I.
Major Thomas P. Ehrhart
See Book Description
Related to Increasing Small Arms Lethality In Afghanistan
Related ebooks
Enhancing Combat Effectiveness;: The Evolution Of The United States Army Infantry Rifle Squad Since The End Of World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScouts Out! The Development Of Reconnaissance Units In Modern Armies [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ensuring The Continued Relevance Of Long Range Surveillance Units Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnemy Inside The Gates: Snipers In Support Of Military Operations In Urbanized Terrain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecial Forces Sniper Skills Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanguard Of Valor : Small Unit Actions In Afghanistan Vol. I [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Modern Snipers Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Air-Mech-Strike: Asymmetric Maneuver Warfare for the 21st Century Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Special Forces Command And Control In Afghanistan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe M4 Carbine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuns of the Special Forces, 2001–2015 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Between The Rivers: Combat Action In Iraq, 2003-2005 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCombat Techniques: The Complete Guide to How Soldiers Fight Wars Today Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Illustrated Manual of Sniper Skills Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eyes Behind the Lines: US Army Long-Range Reconnaissance and Surveillance Units [Revised Edition] Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Become a Rifle Expert - Master Your Marksmanship With US Army Rifle & Sniper Handbooks: Sniper & Counter Sniper Techniques; M16A1, M16A2/3, M16A4 & M4 Carbine; Combat Fire Methods, Night Fire Training, Moving Target Engagement, Short-Range Marksmanship Training, Field Techniques… Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWarfare in the Enemy’s Rear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractical Guide to the Operational Use of the HK69A1 Grenade Launcher Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Bosnia To Baghdad: The Evolution Of US Army Special Forces From 1995-2004 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSniper and Counter Sniper Tactics - The Official U.S. Army Manual Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Sniper's Conflict: An Elite Sharpshooter?s Thrilling Account of Hunting Insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRifle Marksmanship: A Guide to M16- and M4-Series Weapons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCounter Sniper Manual - The Official US Army Manual Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractical Guide to the Operational Use of the DShK & DShKM Machine Gun Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConvoy Ambush Case Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuerrilla Warfare Tactics In Urban Environments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Practical Guide to the Operational Use of the AK47/AKM and AK74 Rifle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sniper: Sniping skills from the world's elite forces Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fall and Rise: The Story of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Government's Secret Plan to Save Itself--While the Rest of Us Die Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bill O'Reilly's Legends and Lies: The Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The General and the Genius: Groves and Oppenheimer - The Unlikely Partnership that Built the Atom Bomb Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Harm's Way: The Sinking of the USS Indianapolis and the Extraordinary Story of Its Survivors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Increasing Small Arms Lethality In Afghanistan
2 ratings1 review
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Excellent resource documenting the continuing dilemma over Infantry Small Arms, Ammunition and Ballistics, and Tactics and Training.
Book preview
Increasing Small Arms Lethality In Afghanistan - Major Thomas P. Ehrhart
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 2009 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2015, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
INCREASING SMALL ARMS LETHALITY IN AFGHANISTAN: TAKING BACK THE INFANTRY HALF-KILOMETER
BY
MAJOR THOMAS P. EHRHART, UNITED STATES ARMY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
INTRODUCTION 7
CAPABILITY OF THE INFANTRY—1917-2003 10
World War I 10
The Interwar period 11
World War II 13
The Korean War 15
The Pentomic Era 17
Vietnam 19
Post-Vietnam 21
TAKING BACK THE INFANTRY HALF-KILOMETER 23
Equipment issues 23
M855 5.56mm Green Tip
23
Alternate Calibers 26
Optics 30
Increasing reliability of the weapon system 34
Arms Room Concept 38
Improving Doctrine 40
Squad Designated Marksman 40
Improved Battlesight zero 41
Improving Tactical Marksmanship Training 42
The Rifle Qualification Course 42
CONCLUSION 45
APPENDIX A—1949 RIFLE QUALIFICATION 50
APPENDIX B—MEU (SOC) M4 QUALIFICATION COURSE 54
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 55
BIBLIOGRAPHY 56
ABSTRACT
Operations in Afghanistan frequently require United States ground forces to engage and destroy the enemy at ranges beyond 300 meters. These operations occur in rugged terrain and in situations where traditional supporting fires are limited due to range or risk of collateral damage. With these limitations, the infantry in Afghanistan require a precise, lethal fire capability that exists only in a properly trained and equipped infantryman. While the infantryman is ideally suited for combat in Afghanistan, his current weapons, doctrine, and marksmanship training do not provide a precise, lethal fire capability to 500 meters and are therefore inappropriate.
Comments from returning non-commissioned officers and officers reveal that about fifty percent of engagements occur past 300 meters. The enemy tactics are to engage United States forces from high ground with medium and heavy weapons, often including mortars, knowing that we are restricted by our equipment limitations and the inability of our overburdened soldiers to maneuver at elevations exceeding 6000 feet. Current equipment, training, and doctrine are optimized for engagements under 300 meters and on level terrain
There are several ways to extend the lethality of the infantry. A more effective 5.56-mm bullet can be designed which provides enhanced terminal performance out to 500 meters. A better option to increase incapacitation is to adopt a larger caliber cartridge, which will function using components of the M16/M4. The 2006 study by the Joint Service Wound Ballistics-Integrated Product Team discovered that the ideal caliber seems to be between 6.5 and 7-mm. This was also the general conclusion of all military ballistics studies since the end of World War I.
The reorganization of the infantry squad in 1960 eliminated the M1D sniper rifle and resulted in the loss of the precision mid-range capability of the infantry squad. The modern solution to this problem is the squad designated marksman. The concept of the squad designated marksman is that a soldier receives the training necessary to engage targets beyond the 300-meter range limitation of current marksmanship programs, but below the 600 meter capability of actual snipers. As of June 2009, the equipment and training of the squad designated marksman has yet to be standardized. In field manual 3-22.9 there are only fourteen pages dedicated to training the squad designated marksman.
Any weapon system designed to perform in various environments will invariably make compromises in order to perform all requirements. The modular nature of the M4/M16 series of weapons lends itself to the arms room concept. Under the arms room concept, each soldier would have multiple weapons and optics combinations available. Commanders would have the flexibility to adjust the capabilities of the infantry squad for the anticipated environment while maintaining commonality of the manual of arms.
Finally, the current qualification course does not accurately depict the enemy on the battlefield. It is based on the 1960’s and 70’s concept of active defense strategy. Targets come up and depending on their range, remain up for a period of five to ten seconds. The modern battlefield is never this static. Soldiers fire twenty rounds from a prone or foxhole-supported position, then ten rounds from a prone-unsupported position and finally ten rounds from the kneeling position. Soldiers are conditioned to expect that their targets will not move, will only require one shot to incapacitate, and that a hit anywhere will result in that incapacitation.
The Army now has the opportunity to rectify this degradation of marksmanship capability and take back the infantry half kilometer. The ability to engage targets out to 500 meters requires significant revisions to doctrine, training, and equipment. These revisions require emphasis from the highest levels of military leadership.
INTRODUCTION
Operations in Afghanistan frequently require United States ground forces to engage and destroy the enemy, often at ranges beyond 300 meters. These operations occur in rugged terrain and in situations where traditional supporting fires are limited due to range or risk of collateral damage. With these limitations, the infantry in Afghanistan require a precise, lethal fire capability that exists only in a properly trained and equipped infantryman. The thesis of this paper is that while the infantryman is ideally suited for combat in Afghanistan, his current weapons, doctrine and marksmanship training do not provide a precise, lethal fire capability to 500 meters and are therefore inappropriate.
If the infantryman in Afghanistan is not effective in killing the enemy with small arms fire, what are the problems and how can these problems be fixed? This paper will determine if current small arms, marksmanship training, and doctrine are appropriate for combat in Afghanistan and how changes in these areas can increase small arms lethality.
An examination of past and current equipment, doctrine, training, and organization, reveals where shortcomings originate. Knowing how the Army got to where it is today, identifying current requirements, and discussing potential solutions, the Army can implement changes that will immediately increase small arms lethality of the infantry force in Afghanistan.
The mission of the infantry is to close with the enemy by means of fire and maneuver to defeat or capture