Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Illinois Judge Charles Reynard Screwed Alan Beaman and Donna Gaston Pt. 3

    Uploaded by

    Christopher King
    68 views3 pages
    http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2013/01/kingcast-mortgage-movies-alan-beaman.html I told you some time ago about Judge Reynard allowing a completely fabricated and fraudulent foreclosure case to go forward against a septuagenarian right? You remember grandmother Donna Gaston on the obviously cooked books authored by National City Bank when they falsified her escrow accounts to foreclose on her? Yep. She had already prevailed by proving that she never missed a payment so they invented a new reason after one attorney basically spit in her face and said "I've never lost a foreclosure... and you're not even an attorney.... it's not over yet." Well you are right about something counselor you got your "victory" but it is not over yet because I'll be coming to document more of this case and the players involved in it. Beaman v. Reynard et al. Amended Complaint Beaman v. Reynard et al. Motion for Reconsideration Judge Reynard sure is involved in a lot of cases as a Defendant, yet they all seem to slip away don't they? Well it appears that much of the pending case against Reynard James Souk -- another dirty prosecutor -- for fabricating and/or withholding evidence is slipping away as well, with the Federal Court refusing to accept intervening law regarding absolute and qualified immunity. That's not just my opinion ask the folks at Northwestern's law department as you read the excerpt from Mr. Beamon's Motion to Reconsider: The controlling law on which the Court‟s decision rested has been fundamentally altered as a result of the Seventh Circuit‟s May 30, 2012 decision in Whitlock v. Brueggemann, __F.3d __, 2012 WL 1939906 (7th Cir. May 30, 2012) (opinion attached as Ex. A). Whitlock affirmed the denial of qualified immunity for an assistant state‟s attorney who fabricated evidence during an investigation and then went on to prosecute the case using the very evidence that he himself had fabricated. The reasoning in Whitlock bears directly on this Court‟s decision as to whether Souk and Reynard should be afforded qualified immunity for their participation in the suppression of exculpatory evidence during the Lockmiller murder investigation, and requires reconsideration of the Court‟s earlier dismissal of the federal due process claim against those prosecutors arising out of that suppression. It is unquestioned that Plaintiff has alleged an adequate due process violation based on Souk‟s and Reynard‟s participation in the concealment of material and exculpatory evidence. In its March 2011 opinion, this Court acknowledged as much, stating that “there appears to be no question or argument that the material withheld, the evidence regarding John Doe, was significant enough such that the government was obligated to turn over the material without a specific request.” 3/3/11 Opinion and Order at 11 But alas, this argument was unpersuasive to the Court and Judge Reynard is left to continue on his way. And that way is a bad way. Here is an excerpt from the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint: 30. The Defendants concealed from Plaintiff and his defense counsel the fact that their own investigation had confirmed Plaintiff’s alibi and essentially eliminated his opportunity to commit the murder. 31. Plaintiff was videotaped leaving Bell Federal Savings & Loan in Rockford at 10:11:43 a.m. on the day of the murder. Phone records also showed that at 10:37 a.m. that day, a two-minute phone call was placed from Plaintiff’s residence to his church. At 10:39 a.m., a one-minute phone call was placed from Plaintiff’s residence to the home of Mitchell Olson, the church’s director of youth ministries and music. 32. The State’s case against Plaintiff heavily relied upon the theory that Plaintiff did not make the phone calls from his residence on the day of the murder. Plaintiff’s mother, Carol Beaman, testified that when she returned home at approximately 2:16 p.m. that afternoon, Plaintiff was in his room and his car was in the dr

    Original Title

    Illinois Judge Charles Reynard screwed Alan Beaman and Donna Gaston Pt. 3

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2013/01/kingcast-mortgage-movies-alan-beaman.html I told you some time ago about Judge Reynard allowing a completely fabricated and fraudulent foreclosure case to go forward against a septuagenarian right? You remember grandmother Donna Gaston on the obviously cooked books authored by National City Bank when they falsified her escrow accounts to foreclose on her? Yep. She had already prevailed by proving that she never missed a payment so they invented a new reason after one attorney basically spit in her face and said "I've never lost a foreclosure... and you're not even an attorney.... it's not over yet." Well you are right about something counselor you got your "victory" but it is not over yet because I'll be coming to document more of this case and the players involved in it. Beaman v. Reynard et al. Amended Complaint Beaman v. Reynard et al. Motion for Reconsideration Judge Reynard sure is involved in a lot of cases as a Defendant, yet they all seem to slip away don't they? Well it appears that much of the pending case against Reynard James Souk -- another dirty prosecutor -- for fabricating and/or withholding evidence is slipping away as well, with the Federal Court refusing to accept intervening law regarding absolute and qualified immunity. That's not just my opinion ask the folks at Northwestern's law department as you read the excerpt from Mr. Beamon's Motion to Reconsider: The controlling law on which the Court‟s decision rested has been fundamentally altered as a result of the Seventh Circuit‟s May 30, 2012 decision in Whitlock v. Brueggemann, __F.3d __, 2012 WL 1939906 (7th Cir. May 30, 2012) (opinion attached as Ex. A). Whitlock affirmed the denial of qualified immunity for an assistant state‟s attorney who fabricated evidence during an investigation and then went on to prosecute the case using the very evidence that he himself had fabricated. The reasoning in Whitlock bears directly on this Court‟s decision as to whether Souk and Reynard should be afforded qualified immunity for their participation in the suppression of exculpatory evidence during the Lockmiller murder investigation, and requires reconsideration of the Court‟s earlier dismissal of the federal due process claim against those prosecutors arising out of that suppression. It is unquestioned that Plaintiff has alleged an adequate due process violation based on Souk‟s and Reynard‟s participation in the concealment of material and exculpatory evidence. In its March 2011 opinion, this Court acknowledged as much, stating that “there appears to be no question or argument that the material withheld, the evidence regarding John Doe, was significant enough such that the government was obligated to turn over the material without a specific request.” 3/3/11 Opinion and Order at 11 But alas, this argument was unpersuasive to the Court and Judge Reynard is left to continue on his way. And that way is a bad way. Here is an excerpt from the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint: 30. The Defendants concealed from Plaintiff and his defense counsel the fact that their own investigation had confirmed Plaintiff’s alibi and essentially eliminated his opportunity to commit the murder. 31. Plaintiff was videotaped leaving Bell Federal Savings & Loan in Rockford at 10:11:43 a.m. on the day of the murder. Phone records also showed that at 10:37 a.m. that day, a two-minute phone call was placed from Plaintiff’s residence to his church. At 10:39 a.m., a one-minute phone call was placed from Plaintiff’s residence to the home of Mitchell Olson, the church’s director of youth ministries and music. 32. The State’s case against Plaintiff heavily relied upon the theory that Plaintiff did not make the phone calls from his residence on the day of the murder. Plaintiff’s mother, Carol Beaman, testified that when she returned home at approximately 2:16 p.m. that afternoon, Plaintiff was in his room and his car was in the dr

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    68 views3 pages

    Illinois Judge Charles Reynard Screwed Alan Beaman and Donna Gaston Pt. 3

    Uploaded by

    Christopher King
    http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2013/01/kingcast-mortgage-movies-alan-beaman.html I told you some time ago about Judge Reynard allowing a completely fabricated and fraudulent foreclosure case to go forward against a septuagenarian right? You remember grandmother Donna Gaston on the obviously cooked books authored by National City Bank when they falsified her escrow accounts to foreclose on her? Yep. She had already prevailed by proving that she never missed a payment so they invented a new reason after one attorney basically spit in her face and said "I've never lost a foreclosure... and you're not even an attorney.... it's not over yet." Well you are right about something counselor you got your "victory" but it is not over yet because I'll be coming to document more of this case and the players involved in it. Beaman v. Reynard et al. Amended Complaint Beaman v. Reynard et al. Motion for Reconsideration Judge Reynard sure is involved in a lot of cases as a Defendant, yet they all seem to slip away don't they? Well it appears that much of the pending case against Reynard James Souk -- another dirty prosecutor -- for fabricating and/or withholding evidence is slipping away as well, with the Federal Court refusing to accept intervening law regarding absolute and qualified immunity. That's not just my opinion ask the folks at Northwestern's law department as you read the excerpt from Mr. Beamon's Motion to Reconsider: The controlling law on which the Court‟s decision rested has been fundamentally altered as a result of the Seventh Circuit‟s May 30, 2012 decision in Whitlock v. Brueggemann, __F.3d __, 2012 WL 1939906 (7th Cir. May 30, 2012) (opinion attached as Ex. A). Whitlock affirmed the denial of qualified immunity for an assistant state‟s attorney who fabricated evidence during an investigation and then went on to prosecute the case using the very evidence that he himself had fabricated. The reasoning in Whitlock bears directly on this Court‟s decision as to whether Souk and Reynard should be afforded qualified immunity for their participation in the suppression of exculpatory evidence during the Lockmiller murder investigation, and requires reconsideration of the Court‟s earlier dismissal of the federal due process claim against those prosecutors arising out of that suppression. It is unquestioned that Plaintiff has alleged an adequate due process violation based on Souk‟s and Reynard‟s participation in the concealment of material and exculpatory evidence. In its March 2011 opinion, this Court acknowledged as much, stating that “there appears to be no question or argument that the material withheld, the evidence regarding John Doe, was significant enough such that the government was obligated to turn over the material without a specific request.” 3/3/11 Opinion and Order at 11 But alas, this argument was unpersuasive to the Court and Judge Reynard is left to continue on his way. And that way is a bad way. Here is an excerpt from the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint: 30. The Defendants concealed from Plaintiff and his defense counsel the fact that their own investigation had confirmed Plaintiff’s alibi and essentially eliminated his opportunity to commit the murder. 31. Plaintiff was videotaped leaving Bell Federal Savings & Loan in Rockford at 10:11:43 a.m. on the day of the murder. Phone records also showed that at 10:37 a.m. that day, a two-minute phone call was placed from Plaintiff’s residence to his church. At 10:39 a.m., a one-minute phone call was placed from Plaintiff’s residence to the home of Mitchell Olson, the church’s director of youth ministries and music. 32. The State’s case against Plaintiff heavily relied upon the theory that Plaintiff did not make the phone calls from his residence on the day of the murder. Plaintiff’s mother, Carol Beaman, testified that when she returned home at approximately 2:16 p.m. that afternoon, Plaintiff was in his room and his car was in the dr

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    Time of Request: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 Client ID/Project Name: Number of Lines: 528 Job Number: 2826:388358681

    Research Information Service: Natural Language Search Print Request: Current Document: 2 Source: IL Federal & State Cases, Combined Search Terms: Alan Beaman

    14:37:45 EST

    1603C6

    Send to:

    King, Christopher TODD WETZELBERGER PO BOX 24702 BALTIMORE, MD 21220-0702

    2 of 99 DOCUMENTS

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. ALAN BEAMAN, Appellant. Docket No. 104096 SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS 229 Ill. 2d 56; 890 N.E.2d 500; 2008 Ill. LEXIS 325; 321 Ill. Dec. 778 May 22, 2008, Opinion Filed

    ********** Print Completed ********** Time of Request: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 Print Number: 2826:388358681 Number of Lines: 528 Number of Pages: 14:37:45 EST

    1603C6

    Send To:

    King, Christopher TODD WETZELBERGER PO BOX 24702 BALTIMORE, MD 21220-0702

    You might also like