Open Letter to the Chair of the Police FederationAIRWAVE

I wonder whether you would give me the courtesy of reading my letter and informing me what I have done to offend you – other than report on arather inconvenient truth?Of the five most recent visits here to my house (or phone calls) from your Officers, all – without exception – have asked for their details to be keptsecret, for fear of victimization. Three of the Officers specifically said “Ihave been told by my Federation not to contact you”.My most obvious question is “Why?” All I have ever reported is peer-reviewed, published research.It was you who ran a Police check on me and published it in your “Airwave – Biographies 23

October 2002” (enclosed) – in it you alsowrite that I was commissioned by you to write the Tetra Report!Three years later, in your Police Federation News 24

April 2005 (P3)you not only deny this, but accuse me of dishonesty – i.e. leaking thefinished document to the internet the day after it was handed to you. Infact, it was taken by the Police Secretary as a disc from the Policecomputer within the secure room where it was written. I never did – andhave never – received a final copy of my report. It could only have beengiven to the internet by yourselves. I do not use or own a computer.

I feel I am owed an apology for your misrepresentation of me

.When your Officers contact me, they have absolutely no idea that theyare a part of an epidemiological study into the effects of microwaves andcancer. If you read my original report, you will see that the GovernmentScientists specifically say that, as you have a young workforce, fit, withwell-defined work patterns –

they will make ideal subjects for anepidemiological study, and long-term illnesses (i.e. cancer) cannot beruled out. (

Their words, not mine

I believe that this is breaking the law

. If your Officers are not informedof all aspects of this experiment; it contravenes the “Regulations andEthical Guidelines” – Directives for Human Experimentation – Nuremberg Code (enclosed). This is to say that the risks of

all

radiationexperiments must be understood before it is started and it cannot be

against their will. At your Airwave Conference 23

October 2002, your Dr Levey told your Officers: “

Use it or resign

”.In fact, concerning risk, I took statistics from one of our Government’sown Professors – printed in a Science Journal “Scientific American” – and adapted them for your Police Officers (enclosed).

You will see thatthere could be 1,090 slow-growing tumours at this point in time

. Thisfigure is, of course, exponential –

it can only get bigger

.You appear to ignore all of the internationally published papers on low-level microwave damage – most of which are conveniently overlooked,or have the “we will repeat this–over the next 10 years–delaying tactic”.Low-level microwaves have been known as very dangerous to our soft,water-based bodies since the 1970’s, when Government Scientists warnedthe military, at the time, against exposure (enclosed). It makes absolutelyno difference which box they come out of: be it TETRA/02/Airwave – or any of the mobiles. The pulsing (modulations), power-density andfrequency may cause variations with some people – but you cannotchange the risk factor of the basic microwaves.Consultant Solicitor Alan Meyer said “It is quite simple – an employer must provide a safe system of work”:

You cannot – and will never – beable to demonstrate that long-term, low-level microwaves will besafe.

I believe, as a Federation, you could pull the plug on this Industry now. Iam prepared to bring you all of the evidence you would need – and I willstand my ground – against any group of Scientists/Professors you care to put in front of me.Although I believe a solution to this would be for myself to write 240words (one side of A4) - a Government Scientist to write an opposingview – you publish them in your magazine and take a vote from your Members. After all – aren’t they the ones who take the risk? (actually,research has shown it is the females who have a greater risk – but I willnot go into why here). Or you could just publish this letter – word for word – and wait for the response.Airwave may be the best thing since sliced bread when it comes toreception. I do not accept that any company is too powerful to bestopped/changed if the Members of the Force request it – no matter whatthe political situation. Are you afraid of this scenario?

Which brings me back to my original point.

•

Why, in a country of free speech, are your Members told not tocommunicate with me?

•

Why are they afraid to leave their names?

•

Why are they afraid of being victimized?

Would you please put in writing one thing I have written or said whichwarrants my censorship from your Members.

Barrie Trower3 Flowers MeadowLivertonDevonTQ12 6UP01626 82101417

January 2009PS – The recently published “Biological & Cancer Safety Limits forElectromagnetic Radiation” places your Officers well inside the‘Adverse Human Effects’ box for the Airwave frequencies.