Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Tankers too risky, oil-spill expert says

Tankers too risky, oil-spill expert says

Ratings: (0)|Views: 9|Likes:
Vancouver Sun article by Larry Pynn from January 12, 2013 about my Enbridge Northern Gateway project and other marine oil spill work.
Vancouver Sun article by Larry Pynn from January 12, 2013 about my Enbridge Northern Gateway project and other marine oil spill work.

More info:

Published by: WorldoceanConsulting on Jan 13, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/22/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Tankers too risky on B.C.’s north coast, oil
-
spill consultant says
 
Major spill could be ‘catastrophic and irreversible’
 
By Larry Pynn, Vancouver Sun January 12, 2013
Gerald Graham of Victoria-based Worldocean Consulting Ltd., is a marineconsultant involved in B.C. oil-spill issues for a quarter century.Photograph by: Picasa
A marine consultant involved in B.C. oil-spill issues for a quarter century says the risks of atanker oil spill associated with Enbridge Northern Gateway are simply too great for the project toproceed.
 
Gerald Graham of Victoria-based Worldocean Consulting Ltd. said that calculations based on
Enbridge’s own research show there is a 8.7
-to-14.1-per-cent chance of at least one tanker spillgreater than 31,500 barrels over a 50-year period, depending on whether the pipeline has a525,000 or 850,000 barrel per day capacity.
“The consequences of a major oil spill along B.C.’s north coast … could be catastrophic andirreversible,” he says in a submission t
o the Joint Review Panel studying the Enbridge proposal.
“Couple this potentially disastrous outcome with a one
-in-seven chance of one or more majorspills occurring, and the overall threat level posed by Northern Gateway becomes unacceptably
high.”
 Graham said two events led him into the oil-spill business: the 250,000-barrel Exxon Valdezsupertanker spill in Alaska on March 24, 1989, and the Nestucca accident of Dec. 23, 1988, inwhich 5,500 barrels bunker C oil leaked from a barge off Grays Harbor, Wash., drifted north intoB.C. waters.
He also served as “full
-time, in-
house consultant” to a federal oil
-spill review panel, whose 1990report recommended, in part, double-hulled tankers and that cleanup volunteers be paid for theirservices and be covered by then-
Workers’ Compensation Board regulations.
 
B.C.’s “sinuous” and isolated coastline, lack of infrastructure and powerful storms, “all mitigate
against effective oil spill response operations, especially during winter months when the days are
short,” and
would pose overwhelming challenges to oil-spill responders, Graham said.At risk are coastal First Nations communities, shellfish harvesting areas, commercial fishing,ecotourism, marine life
 — 
especially diving birds
 — 
and protected areas, including potentiallyGwaii Haanas National Park and National Marine Conservation Area reserves.Graham said a ban on crude-
oil tankers “has been scrupulously observed” in the Queen Charlotte
Basin since 1972 consistent with a moratorium on B.C. offshore oil and gas exploration, a wisedecision in light of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.While Transport Canada says Northern Gateway tankers can safely access a terminal in Kitimat,
Graham said the marine component of the project “is not in fact safe” and “as a whole is not inthe public interest.”
 Graham noted it is the carrier of the oil
 — 
the tanker owner, not Enbridge
 — 
who would beresponsible for oil-spill cleanup operations and associated costs, with Coast Guard assuming amonitoring role, initially at least.He added Enbridge has not adequately explained how it would clean up after a bitumen spill, orhow much would likely be recovered.
“It is clearly in the long
-term public interest of all of Canada to save this relatively pristineenvironment, the largest area of intact coastal temperate rainforest in the world, from the ravages
of unchecked industrial development.” he said.
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->