• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 8
    CommentGo Back
 
REGISTEREDMOST IMPORTANT CIRCULAR OFFICE OF THE PCDA (PENSIONS), DRAUPADI GHAT ALLAHABADCircular No.403. Dated: 02.02.2009.To,1. The Chief Accountant, RBI, Deptt. of Govt. Bank Account CentralOffice,C-7 IInd Floor Bandre Kurla Complex, P.B. No. 8143 Bandre East,Mumbai-400051.2. All CMDs of Public Sector Banks3. CMD of ICICI Bank4. CMD of IDBI Bank5. CMD of Axis Bank6. CMD of HDFC Bank7. Military and Air Attache, Indian Embassy Kathmandu Nepal.8. The Defence Pension Disbursing Officers.9. The Treasury officers.10. The Pay and Accounts Office.11. Pay and Accounts Office, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.12. The Post Master Kathua (J & K), Camp Bell Bay (Andaman & Nicobar)Subject
:- Implementation of Government’s decision on the recommendationsof the Sixth Central Pay Commission – Revision of Pension of Pre2006 Armed Forces Pensioners / Family Pensioners.
Reference
:-GOI, MOD letter No. No. 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy) dated11.11.2008 and this Office Circulars No. 397 dated 18.11.2008, 398dated 18.11.2008 and No. 401 dated 18.12.2008-----*-----*-----Annexure – II of the Ministry of Defence letter No. 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy) dated 11.11.2008 which was modified/substituted vide Ministry of Defence letter No. 17(4)/2008(1)/D (Pen/Policy) dated 11.12.2008 is furthersubstituted by enclosed
Annexure II
vide MOD letter No. 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy) dated 20.01.2009(copy enclosed), which is self explanatory.2. In Annexure-III, Table - 2 of MOD letter dated 11.11.2008, the rate of family pension in respect of Nb Subedar Group ’A’/’X’ and Subedar Group ’A’/’X’ is corrected as under:-Nb Sub Group “A”/”X” read “5070” for “5570” Subedar Group “A”/”X’” read “5190” for “5490” 3. The words and figures “under Para 5.1” as appearing below the Table butabove the Notes of Annexure –I to MOD letter No.17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Services) dated 11.11.2008 may be deleted as it has no relevance to Para5.(Para 5.1.not in existence)
 
2
4. It has come to the notice that some of the PDAs while consolidating thepension/family pension under Annexure –I to MOD letter dated 11.11.2008 arenot stepping up the pension/family pension vide Annexure –II and Annexure-IIIto MOD letter where it is beneficial than the pension under Annexure -I inrespect of the commissioned officers / PBOR. They are resorting only to theconsolidation of pension as per the Annexure –I. Such action on the part of thePDAs, in particular to Banks, is not in accordance to the Government Orders,leads to complaints from the Pensioners/ Family Pensioners and has been viewedseriously by the Government as it is affecting the morale of the Ex Service men.Detailed instructions in this regard already exist in Para 6 of this office circularNo. 397 dated 18.11.2008.However, it is once again reiterated that the PDAs may invariably adhereto the following steps while revising the pension/family pension with effect from1.1.2006.(i) First, determine the basic pension from the records held and consolidateas per Annexure –I to MOD letter No.17 (4)/2008(1)/D (Pen/services) dated11.11.2008.(ii) Thereafter check the pension so consolidated against the minimumpension authorised under the protection clause as in Annexure – II in respect of the commissioned officers and Annexure –III in respect of Personnel BelowOfficers Rank with reference to rank last held and qualifying service. Thepension/family pension as per Annexure –II or Annexure-III as the case may be,if beneficial, is to be paid with effect from 1.1.2006.5. Lt General holding appointment of Army Commander and Vice Chief of theArmy Staff in Army and equivalent rank in Navy and Air Force were grantedhigher rate of pension on their retirement after 1.3.1978.Pension Payment Order(PPO) in their respect do/do not indicate the specific appointment they held onthe date of retirement. However, while revising their pension on implementationof Fifth CPC, the Corrigendum PPO in each case indicate the appointment held bythe Lt General as Army Commander or Vice Chief of Army Staff (VCOAS).PDAsare therefore, requested to look into their records and revise the pension of Army Commanders/VCOAS accordingly vide Annexure –I read with Annexure –IIto MOD letter 11.11.2008 as now substituted. Where the PDAs are not able tolocate the Corr PPO revising pension for Army Commander/VCOAS with effectfrom 1.1.1996, in their record, the officer may be requested to provide his copyof PPO(Photocopy may be retained by the Officer) and pension may be revisedand simultaneously the case may be referred to the Pension Sanctioningauthority concerned for confirmation of the revised rate of pension with effectfrom 1.1.2006.6. In Annexure-I of MOD letter dated 11.11.2008, consolidated rate of pension for basic pension of above Rs. 13000/- but less than Rs. 15000/- havenot been indicated due to the fixed scale of pension. In cases where existingpension is more than Rs. 13000/- the same shall be consolidated as perprovision of Para 4 of MOD letter dated 11.11.2008.
 
3
7. Further, in some cases the quantum of pension indicated in Annexure –IIIto MOD’s letter No.17 (4)/2008(1)/ D (Pen/Policy) dated 11.11.2008 ascirculated vide this office Circular No. 397 dated 18.11.2008 quoted underreference, in respect of Naik and Havildar having less qualifying service thantheir full terms of engagements plus admissible weightage works out to be lessas compared to the one shown for the rank of a Sepoy. This is due to higherweightage of 10 years admissible to a Sepoy as compared to the rank of Naikand Havildar, the admissible weightage for whom is comparatively less viz. 8years and 6 years respectively. Therefore, where even if each of them haverendered equal number of years of actual qualifying service, the qualifyingservice for pension with weightage in the case of Sepoy will be more by 4 yearsas compared to Havildar and by 2 years as compared to Naik. The proratareduction in the quantum of admissible pension will thus be more in the case of Havildar by 4 years and 2 years for Naik as compared to the Sepoy even if theyrender equal number of actual qualifying service.It is further clarified that the said Annexure-III is not the ultimatedeterminator for the entitlement of pension and in case the revised pension asper Annexure –I to the MOD’s letter dated 11.11.2008 happens to be morebeneficial than the one indicted in the Annexure -III ibid, more beneficialpension will be payable. However, in case the pension consolidated as perAnnexure –I read with para 4 of MOD letter dated 11.11.2008 is less than theamount indicated in Annexure –III, the pension protection as indicated in thesetables will be given. The rate of pension in Annexure –III is protective and notthe entitlement.8. Appendix ‘A’ of Circular No. 397 dated 18.11.2008 has been slightlymodified. Now the Pay Bands in respect of PBOR and Commissioned Officersintroduced in 6
th
CPC with effect from 1.1.2006 are also included in thisAppendix ‘A’ for information. The modified
Appendix “A”
is enclosed forinformation of all concerned.9. It is observed that during implementation of Ministry of Defence letterdated 11.11.2008 (Circular NO 397 dated 18.11.2008), several queries are beingreceived from various corners. Therefore, the following furtherclarifications/instructions are issued for the smooth implementation of Ministry of Defence letter on the subject:-(i)
 
As per existing rule, pension of TS Naik/Hony NK and Hony Havildar isRe 1/- less than pension admissible for NK and Havildar for the same length of qualifying Service and group of pay in which he was last paid respectively. It istherefore, clarified that the rate of pension shown in Annexure III (modifiedparity of pension) may be reduced by Re 1/- while comparing revised pension forTS Naik, Hony Naik and Hony Havildar between Annexure –I and Annexure-III –Table 1.(ii)
 
Havildar granted Hony rank of Nb Subedar and retired prior to 1.1.96 aredrawing consolidated pension taking into account the additional pension of Rs 100/- pm with effect from 1.1.1996 as per MOD letter dated 14.07.1998.Thescheme of improvement in pension of PBOR introduced with effect from 1.1.2006vide MOD letter No.14 (3)/2004-D(Pen/Sers) –Vol –III dated 1.2.2006 and No.14(3)/2004-D(Pen/Sers) –Vol V dated 2.5.2006 was not beneficial to Havildar
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
Munaga Nageswara Rao

all they treat u as second class citizens and slaves in the battle fields. with all due apologies. JAI HIND

reply03 / 02 / 2012
Munaga Nageswara Rao

not only that they are least bothered not interested, ever transfering/disturbing/least importnce to this setion as every banker sees how to improve thier profit not service motive. i can challenge openly to higherst officials from CMD to finance minister and defence mionister. all are bogus.

reply03 / 02 / 2012
Munaga Nageswara Rao

letter and spirit but also inform by sending the calculated sheet and the amount credited to his account and also ask him wehter it was done correctly. of course, no paying banker is abreasted with full knowledge nay atleast the minimum reqiuired knowledge to calculate the revision and the exact amount

reply03 / 02 / 2012
Munaga Nageswara Rao

Sir, with regard to any revision in pension for the ORs/NCOs/JCOs, the PPA has to inform individual defence pensioner as they are less educated unlike the officers who are not only educated but very smart in this regard, as they never take up the interest of all ESM categories. it is the fundamental duty of the Govt authorities and Pension Paying authrities not only implement the notification in l

reply03 / 02 / 2012
narasingh42

sit latest pcda letter not available for pay fixation. please enable

reply11 / 28 / 2009
gprabhakar299946

I would like to point out that many banks do not know that weightage has to be added to ground service rendered by officers ranks to arrive at correct pension .Many a time, they are reluctant to calculate the amount. I sugest that PCDA shou;d issue tables showing correct pension agaist weighted service for each rank to avoid mistakes -Msg snt by Lt Col G.P.RAO(IC7540),ex-Corps of Signals

reply07 / 08 / 2009
reiva09

I am an army officer's wife. I am getting enhanced family pension. My bank is also creating same problem for me as you mentioned above. I have no idea what action I should take. Could you please give me some guidelines regarding this problem. my e mail address is ritavholt@gmail.com.I will be very thankful. with best wishes reiva09

02 / 03 / 2010
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...