Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity or New Trial(Dkt. 820);
Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement orNew Trial (Dkt. 831); and
Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Damages or a NewTrial (Dkt. 833);
B. By Plaintiff:
Motion for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages by I/P Engine,Inc. (Dkt. 825);
Motion for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 by I/PEngine, Inc. (Dkt. 835);
Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc. (Dkt.822) (“Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties”).
The parties have agreed to move for an extension of time to respond to the Post-JudgmentMotions, such that Oppositions would be due on January 25, 2013, and Reply Briefs would bedue on February 15, 2013.3.
On December 21, 2012, the Defendants filed their Motion to Postpone Briefing and Rulingon Plaintiff’s Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. Unless expedited, a response to thatmotion will not be due until January 4, 2013 under Local Rule 7, and a reply will not be dueuntil January 10, 2013, which would leave Defendants with little time to prepare theirOpposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties if necessary. To ensuresufficient time for a response while avoiding unnecessary expenditure of resources,Defendants and Plaintiff have jointly requested that the response to the Motion to PostponeBriefing and Ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties be expedited.4.
Plaintiff and Defendants jointly request that the Court enter an order requiring expediting thebriefing schedule for the Motion To Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion for
Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 849 Filed 12/21/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 22015