Assessment Committee Meeting 01-22-09 1Minutes taken by Stephanie Owen
Assessment Committee Meeting MinutesJanuary 22, 2009 3:00-5:00 in Room 3603
Members Present: Claire Stuart-Quintanilla, Jane Reynolds, Marietta McDuffy, Hope Essien,Stephanie Owen, Lisa Owens, Michael Callon, Lois Collins, Nelly Calub, Sohee Jon, BeverlyAnderson, Boniface Ekpenyong, Tracey Hudson, Nelida Metio, Ali Khan, Ahmed Khan, PierreHarges, Sheila Wicks, Luc Elie, David St. John, Edna BooneMinutes taken by Stephanie Owen, Recorder I.
Sign-in Roll CallII.
Department representatives
•
Representatives from each department/program is as followed:Math: Hope Essien (Chair) and David St. JohnRespiratory Care: Jane Reynolds (Director) and IjazBiology: Lois Collins and Sheila WicksEnglish: Michael Callon (Chair), Lisa Owens, and Mary Beth Jone Nursing: Carmen Hovanec, Beverly Anderson, and Nelly CalubPhysics/Chemistry: Edna Boone, Joshua OladipoLibrary: Stephanie Owen, Fumilayo RufaiSurgical Technology: Marietta McDuffy, Neelida MetioRenal Technology: Ali Khan, Ahmed KhanPolitical Science: Claire Stuart QuintanillaIII.
Update on Faculty Resource Room
•
There are some issues with the electricity and hooking up the computers
•
Computers are here and furniture have been ordered
•
Will continue to meet in room 3603 until we hear we can move into resourceroomIV.
Assessment Committee elections for officers
•
Will be voting for new officials in April. Each officer serves a mandatory oneyear term
•
Guidelines for consideration: Must be on the committee for at least a year.
•
Open positions are: Chair, Co-Chair, Team leader, Recorder, Public relationsV.
SLP update
•
Claire has a list of those who submitted SLP post-tests from Dean Javior. Theyare Math, English, Biology, Physical Science, Chemistry, Social Science, andCIS/Business
•
Renal swears they turned theirs in to their Director, as well as Mortuary Science
•
Respiratory Care and Phlebotomy have their scores but need to turn them in
•
Nursing has them but not scored yet
•
No results for Pharmacy, Physician’s Assistant, CNA, and Radiology
•
Would like to develop a survey asking what could have been done differently toensure greater numbers? Why did only
½
of the results get turned in?
•
Some problems and issues: Asked: What went wrong with the process? Some of the issues were: Different post-test scoring issues whereby administration (?) useddifferent procedures for post from prêt-test; graders did not get instructions onwho/how to turn in the post-test scoring or turning the scores in; felt instructions
Leave a Comment