Continuum Draft FEIS Oct 2012 - Appendix 4 Stormwater Management File - 73

THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
Prepared for: The Continuum Company LLC 590 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10022 Prepared by: Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP One North Broadway, Suite 1407 White Plains, NY 10601
September 27, 2011 Revised September 24, 2012
THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. SITE PLANNING ..........................................................................................................I 1 A. B. C. D. Site Location ............................................................................................................I Existing Site Conditions ...........................................................................................I Redevelopment Planning Strategies ..........................................................................I Soil Types .................................................................................................................I 1 1 2 5
II. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT VOLUME (WQv) ................................................II 1 A. Redevelopment WQv Methodology .........................................................................II 1 B. Redevelopment WQv Calculations ...........................................................................II 2 III. RUNOFF REDUCTION (RRv) ....................................................................................III 1 A. Redevelopment Requirements for RRv ....................................................................III 1 B. Redevelopment RRv Calculations ............................................................................III 1 IV. ADJUSTED WATER QUALITY TREATMENT VOLUME (WQv) ...........................IV 1 A. Standard Stormwater Management Practices (SMP) ................................................IV 1 B. Alternative Practices Accepted by the NYSDEC .......................................................IV 1 V. WATER QUANTITY CONTROL ................................................................................V 1 VI. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL .........................................................................VI 1 A. Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Measures..................................................VI 1 B. Maintenance of Stormwater Management Measures ................................................VI 2
THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Existing Drainage Conditions .............................................................................. Redeveloped Drainage Conditions ....................................................................... Stormwater Quality Management Measures ......................................................... Stormwater Quantity Design Flow Summary....................................................... Stormwater Management Basin Design Summary ................................................ Stormwater Management Inspections & Maintenance of Permanent Structures ...
PAGE NO. II 3 II 4 II 5 V3 V4 VI 2
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE No. SWM 1 SWM 2 SWM 3 Site Location Map ................................................................................................ Existing Drainage Conditions Map ...................................................................... Proposed Drainage Conditions Map.....................................................................
PAGE NO. I3 I4 I6
Executive Summary
This Stormwater Management Report has been prepared to address changes to the stormwater characteristics at the 4.63 acre 30 South Broadway site that would result from its redevelopment into The Continuum Company facility project in the Village of Irvington, New York. Stormwater management requirements of the proposed redevelopment, including the anticipated site disturbance of approximately 3.5 acres, will be evaluated and quantified in terms of stormwater runoff and pollutants associated with on,site stormwater discharge.
The stormwater management design of the redeveloped facility adheres to a five step process outlined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservations (NYSDEC) New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSSMDM), dated August 2010. The following report is a summary of the strategies employed to redevelop the existing developed site while meeting the stormwater regulations and requirements included in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) SPDES General Permit GP,0,10,001 and the Village of Irvington Town Code, Chapter 183, Stormwater Management requirements.
Through the use of proposed site planning methods, planned green infrastructure techniques, standard and alternative stormwater management practices (SMPs) at the redeveloped site, the proposed stormwater peak rates of stormwater runoff are estimated to be at or below existing conditions for each 24,hour storm event up to and including the 100,year storm event. In addition, through the use of stormwater runoff reduction measures where feasible, the increases in total runoff volume from the entire redeveloped site will be mitigated.
I. Site Planning
A. Site Location The project site is located in the Village of Irvington, New York at 30 South Broadway. The site is bounded to the north by a residential co op complex, to the west by the Old Croton Aqueduct, to the south by two residential homes and the Barney Brook which runs parallel to Station Road and to the east by South Broadway. Via underground storm drainage pipe systems and overland flow, the site ultimately discharges to the Hudson River via the Barney Brook, part of the Lower Hudson River Basins Watershed. Refer to the Site Location Map, Figure SWM 1, for an aerial view of the site and surrounding areas.
B. Existing Site Conditions: The existing 4.63 acre site is currently developed and occupied by the Foundation for Economic Education. The property consists of a three story main building with adjacent accessory buildings, sheds, parking and drives. Outside the limits of these impervious areas and associated lawns, the terrain is partially wooded and sloped. No water quality measures exist as part of the currently developed site. Per the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the project site is not located within a 100 or 500 year flood zone, but ultimately discharges to the Barney Brook which has been mapped to be in these flood zones.1
The 4.63 acre site is part of a larger overall study watershed totaling 10.28 acres, including neighboring parcels north to Main Street and south to the Barney Brook. An Existing Drainage Conditions Map, Figure SWM 2, has been prepared to identify the natural resource areas and existing drainage patterns and discharge points (DP) of the study watershed. The site and surrounding drainage areas in the study watershed are divided into four separate subwatersheds, with two of the four subwatersheds encompassing almost 90% of the study watersheds. Nearly half of the site discharges via overland flow to the Barney Brook along the southern boundary of the site (DP 3), with the remainder of the main
Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 36119C0261F, effective date September 28, 2007.
I1
portion of the developed portion property discharging to the east to an existing storm drainage system along South Broadway (DP 1). Less than 20% of the site discharges via
sheet flow to the same existing storm drainage system along South Broadway just upstream of the existing culvert discharging into the Barney Brook (DP 2). The final subwatershed encompasses approximately half of the existing parking area and discharges via both existing underground storm drainage system and overland flow to the Old Croton Aqueduct (DP 4) and ultimately discharges into the Barney Brook.
The entire existing study watershed, approximately 10.28 acres in size, includes approximately 3.62 acres of impervious area, an estimated 35% of the study area. Of the impervious area within the study watershed, an estimated 1.06 acres of impervious area is located on the project site, an estimated 23% of the property.
C. Redevelopment Planning Strategies: The main goal of the redevelopment of the site is to minimize the additional disturbance of undeveloped portion of the property in order to preserve the remaining natural features of the developed site, while maintaining the general drainage patterns of the existing site. The proposed action will be a combination of both redevelopment and new construction, as defined by the NYSDEC New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSSWMDM), August 2010. The portions of the site considered redevelopment are areas of the site that are currently disturbed and will be reconstructed as either pervious or impervious surfaces. The estimated 1.3 acre additional impervious area proposed will be treated and designed as new construction as defined by the NYSSWMDM.
By substantially retaining the main building, driveway and drop off circle and then by siting the remainder of the proposed facility across the former footprint of the existing buildings, parking areas and lawn areas, the northern and eastern portions of the site were generally maintained, and the impacts to the remaining natural features are minimized and increases to the total impervious controlled. By milling and repaving these existing areas, grading, earthwork cut and site disturbance will be minimized. In certain locations where the main
I2
PLOTTED BY: DIVNEY TUNG SCHWALBE, LLP
malfaro
9/7/2011
12:02:10 PM
G:\CADD\725.04 TCC Irvington\725 SWM Figure - Site Location.fig
Sources: Planimetric GIS Data Westchester County GIS Aerial Photo NYS GIS Clearinghouse, April 2009 Survey of Property, prepared by Riley Land Surveyors, dated 11/26/08
S U HC T E E S R O T O TN T TET E
ST AT I O
R O
AD
D C Q E U T R T N A U L OD C O O
BA RN EY BR OO K
ST AT IN O
RO AD
SITE
N RH B O T R A WA O D Y (O T U R U E S9 )
E N A L
) E S9 T U Y R U A (O R A W B O D O T S UH
E R O M A C Y S
RO AD
MAI N
D O O W T S E W E L C R I C
HA RR I MA N
O DOGW
A E OD L N
ST REET
LEGEND DIRECTION OF STORMWATER FLOW (TYP)
150
300
450
SITE LOCATION MAP

THE CONTINUUM COMPANY VILLAGE OF IRVINGTON, NY
SWM-1 09/09/11
90
1 0 3
1 0 3
4 18
1 0 4
147.96
16 4
1 4 4
1 4 2
1 4 0
1 3 8
1 3 6
143.00
87.2
1 0 1
1 1 6
1 3 4
12 3
160
10 3
18 2
16 2
115.44 154.74
92
DP-3
90
14 2
2 2 1
153.44 154.25
90
89.01
153.55
118.44
9 2
87.3
94
5 14
154.05 159.81
161.22
1 62
9 4
154.24
9 8
96
96
104
1 64
20 1
1 00
88.2
100.60
9 8
90.54
5 88.
9 4
9 2
9 6
0 2 1
0 3 1
140
0 5 1
88. 9
93. 90
96.93
1 46
5 89.
14 8
90.51
100.48
1 64
89. 3
90.33
96.06
89. 7
91.19
90 . 7
91.63
1 4 5
91.67
C
94.55
99.77
155.07
9 0 . 6
154.43
9 1 . 1
154.25 153.67
154.51 159.47
91.09 94.24 96.10

90. 8
153.58 155.15 155.77

0 6 1
160.56
156.69
156
156.07 153.07
99.50
90. 4
10 0
1 2 0
92.87
161.27
1 04
9 4
1 06
1 2 1
1 08
1 0 1
1 4 1
156.32
159.55
1 6 1
1 8 1
1 20
1 22
1 24
1 42
1 26
1 2 3
1 8 2
158.60
1 34
1 36
1 30
91 . 2
94.88 93.16
160.95
2 6 1
161.84
96
156.41
95.92
93.97
96.35
90.0
160.45 159.55 161.54 151.13 158.38 157.93 162.00 161.22
62 1
97.34
91 0 .
94.03
92 . 3
94.31
98
95.98
100.00
161.19 161.10
92.11
160.75
156.33
160.74
1 4 6
92.12
98.32
92 . 0
93.47
92. 8
145.13
94.24
00 1
1 58
96.84
151.30
94.42
97.29
1 56
96.68
96.68
1 60
98.13
154.16
94.93
98.85 94.26
133.45 159.59
96
1 52
142.51
97.03 98.99
152.59
1 5 4
94.34
98.46
101.41
98
129.75
95.68
153.60
155.55
94.76
97.48
142.90
126.60
99.05 96.36 97.65
156
143.33
94.78
14 5
10 5
1 00
12 5
18 4
96.34
9 3 . 8
101.63
103.00
103.28 106.75 143.34

16 4
14 4
98.91
149.71
9 97.84 6 . 3
9 4 . 1
12 4
121.60
9 5 . 9
130.22
10 4
18 3
97.06 98.79
145.69
136
97.86
1 0 0
98.04
101.98
14 3
1 02
12 3
99.30
10 3
1 04
118.86
105.31
16 2
1 05. 8
124
101.76
1 07. 0
101.99
108.35
108.44
122
112
106
1 0 8
110.03
109.14
120
1 1 0
18 1
8 1 1
1 1 6
1 1 4
1 4 1
112.76
111.56
1 1 2
4 1 1
111.71 111.67 112.18
2 1 1
DP-2
1 1 2
1 1 6
1 1 4
112.00
112.16
2 1 1
112.88
0
Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP One North Broadway White Plains, NY 10601 P: 914.428.0010 F: 914.428.0017
20
40
80
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

SEPTEMBER 27, 2011
5 1 0
111.90
0 4 1
100
150.76
151.35 149.80 151.48 147.45
151.21
150.01
1 0 5
156.12 156.32 156.01
148.39
5 10
5 12
5 14
156.54
DP-4
156.71 156.16
0 6 1
5 16
152.33
160.06
D
62 1
1 6 2
161.89 155.77 161.17 160.28 160.13 160.76
0 12
8 11
4 1 1
1 1 2
156.01 158.15 163.48 163.28
1 6 2
160
08 1
1 1 0
06 1
02 1
160.78
90
164.86
155.84
158.96
158.48 160.70
0 6 1
155.31
155.19 161.96
155.13
158.19
158.48
164.89
64 1
6 1 2
155.28 160.97 156.87 159.08 158.46
163.81
64 1
58 1
54 1
52 1
50 1
48 1
46 1
44 1
38 1
40 1
54 1
12 6
160.01
160.95
160.14
158.23
160.17
160.69
160.64 160.53 157.54
159.04
7 1 0
160.53 160.69 159.60
160.42
4 . 91
158.58
9 . 91
160.62
3 92.
3 92.
158.86
158.28
159.60
159.41
156.34
A
10 6
158
156
154
156.69
159.81
153.78
0 6 1
7 93.
8 92.
18 5
151.90
154.09 157.05 153.96
4 . 93
8 92.
160
149.78
151.95 151.21
152
18 5
150
1 5 6
18 4
147.59
14 5
149.05 144.86
143.86
152
143.00
16 4
150
143.22
18 4
140.40
5 1 0
6 14
8 . 5 9
0 . 97
16 0
14 4
140.42
3 96.
135.14
138.36
0 4 1
1 4 2
14 4
1 3 8
B
2 12
1 2 2
3 14
1 3 6
4 13
1 3 2
0 13
8 12
4 1 4
42 1
26 1
0 4 1
1 2 4
8 3 1
1 1 2
1 1 2
6 13
1 2 0
1 3 2
0 13
DP-1
7 1 0
4 13
28 1
6 2 1
4 12
22 1
20 1
8 1 1
9 1 0
THE CONTINUUM COMPANY

Irvington, New York
house, driveway and drop off circle are to generally remain, there is inadequate space for treating stormwater runoff. The western and southern portions of the site will be substantially developed, while maintaining the existing buffer where feasible. Green infrastructure techniques, standard stormwater management practices and alternative measures will improve the stormwater quality conditions of the runoff from the site from current conditions.
In addition to careful site planning strategies, stormwater management measures have been proposed to ensure that the developed conditions of the site generally maintain the pre construction hydrology of the site, including the implementation of underground detention pipes, porous pavement, rain gardens and stormwater planters. Refer to the Proposed Drainage Conditions Map, Figure SWM 3 for locations of these measures. These measures significantly improve the overall water quality of the stormwater runoff from the site by providing diversion, infiltration and an increased travel time allowing for sediment removal and uptake into the plant regime.
D. Soil Types: The soil classifications and their limits of the study watershed were provided from mapping compiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Service Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York which has classified the soil types as follows:
Soil Symbol ChE SuB UhB
Hydrologic Soil Group B B B
Description Charlton Loam Sutton Loam Urban Land Charlton Complex
The project site is estimated to be Urban Land Charlton Complex, hydrologic soil group (HSG) B, referred to as very deep, well drained, and gently sloping Charlton soil2. Geotech findings indicate that the site is overlain by natural glacial deposits. The limit of disturbance area for the proposed redevelopment of the site is in this area of urban land and HSG B.
2
Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York USDA Soil Conservation Service, pages 66 67.
I5
PLOTTED BY: DIVNEY TUNG SCHWALBE, LLP
malfaro
8/17/2012
11:54:41 AM
G:\CADD\725.04 TCC Irvington\725 SWM Figure - Dev Conditions.fig
90
1 0 3
1 0 3
4 18
1 0 4
T N U N E L 87.2
147.96
16 4
1 4 4
1 4 0
143.00
4 00 " E N 1 1 0
152.33
(COMPUTED)
5 16
82 81
1 3 8
1 3 6
4 .9 =6 62 R
56 =5 .5 L
0 6 1
83
69. 33
1 0 1
1 1 6
115.44
1 3 4
12 3
10 3
18 2
160
160.06
SE D PI PE
161.89
EX PO
154.74
I RO
14 2
2 2 1
15" RCP I=89.3
155.77 153.44 154.25 161.17 160.28 160.13 160.76

84
69
90
90
89.01
151.5
R=160.37 I=158.67
153.55
92
118.44
9 2
N 64 30 00" W
87.3
94
08 1
5 14
154.05
E B-1 L N151.5 T RP A T R T R WA E SO M
159.81
152.5
E T M N O O S AE P R U PV
9 4
85
161.22
D
86 67 68
1 62
154.24
152.5
156.01 158.15
98
96
P L A N T E R
104
N 2 53 00 " 0 E
20 1
INLET
AREAW AY
96
164.0
87
DRAIN
163.48 163.28
G=160.9
34 89. 1
8 .5 56
1 64
1 5 2
DRAIN INLET
D
1 00
88.2
100.60
O F R E G E NR O
DRAIN 5 F 6 . INLET F E1 4 0 5 F 5. G E1 2 0
D D
160.78
A T E R
G=159.0
8" Maple
6" Sumac
98
G=155.1 DRAIN
88
66 65
90.54
5 88.
9 4
9 6
0 2 1
24" Maple
0 3 1
151.5
INLET
93. 90
R M
14" Maple 12" Maple
9 2
140
0 5 1
5 F 6. F E1 4 0 5 L 5. L E1 2 0
DRAIN INLET D
G=160.7
164.3
x
G=160.7
64
88. 9
96.93
S T O
1 46
14 8
187
152.2
x
O F R E G E NR O
155.84
G=160.8
DRAIN
B-7b
x
5 89.
186
90.51
O F R E G E NR O
D
89
INLET
100.48
188
89. 3
90.33
152.5
158.48
185
158.96
DRAIN
INLET
B-7c
G=160.7
90
63
G=155.0
12" Maple
160.70
96.06
1 5 2
DRAIN INLET
89. 7
P L A N T E R
91.19
LP
182 181
DRAIN DRAIN INLET
14 6
161.96
58 59
155.31
155.19
B-2
90 . 6
A T E R
183
R M
DP-3
91.09
90. 7
91.63
CC-Ex
180 184
151.7
164.46
91
156.00 Y G=160.8 R A A E WA
INLET
155.07
G=160.4
DRAIN
158.19 158.48
INLET
1 54
91.67
B-3
154.43
151.5
155.13
G=160.5 G=160.8
94.55
DRAIN
97
DRAIN INLET
G=161.2
155.28 160.97 156.87 159.08 158.46
INLET
DRAIN INLET DRAIN
S T O
91 . 1
99.77
179
1 4 6
92.12
INLET
G=161.0
98
154.25 153.67 153.58 154.51

94 53
G=161.2
162.4
2 6 1
57
159.47
0 6 1
92
94.24 96.10
152.5 151.1
ANTER PL
153.07
155.15
99
155.77
160.56
90. 8
156.69
156
156.07
93
99.50
178
96
90. 4
10 0
1 02
92.87
164
156.32 159.55 158.60
95
161.8
161.27
1 4 0
9 4
1 06
1 2 1
1 08
1 0 1
1 4 1
1 6 1
1 8 1
1 0 2
1 22
1 24
1 42
1 6 2
1 28
1 32
1 34
1 36
1 30
91 . 2
94.88 93.16
STORM W ATER
150.9
160.95
177
2 6 1
96
CONC. VAULT T=95.7
176
5 F 6. F E1 4 0
156.41
52
51
DRAIN
G=161.1
INLETS
95.92
2 "C 8 M P I 12 =9 .
93.97
96.35
90.0
151.5
1 N 72 43 0" W
97.34
175
G=161.3
160.45
DRAIN INLETS
G=161.4
B-4
91 0 .
94.03
151.13
5 L 5. L E1 2 0
158.38 157.93
159.55 161.54
162.00
R=98.45 I=89.7
94.31
98
95.98
S
92.11
100.00
174
AA-1
161.10
161.22
62 1
92. 3
161.19
LP 149.6
156.33
160.75
160.74
CONC. VAULT T=96.7 6 T O G =9 . " R U H 10

92 . 0
18" Hickory
98.32
160.01
160.95
93.47
160.14
1 6 0
50
92. 8
145.13
158.23
173
94.24
00 1
1 58
160.17
160.69
96.84
CULV. =9 . I 26
4 . 91
209. 51
151.30
1 56
96.68 94.42
96.68
160.64
172
159.04
97.29
160.53 157.54
163.0
154.0
158.58
160.62
98.13
94.93
98.85 94.26
133.45
151.0
1 52
171
5 F 6. F E1 4 0 5 F 5. G E1 2 0
154.16
163.0 160.5
1 60
150.1
163.0 160.5159.59
WV
160.53
44
158.86
1 5 8
DRAIN INLET G=157.1
160.69 159.60
42
96
158.28
T
159.41
159.60
142.51
102
160.42
43 39
15 4
94.34
169
B-6
0 6 1
E ON T S . C N O C &
E L WA S
DRAIN
156.34
INLET
G=158.1
97.03 98.99
168 170
152.59
150.3B-5
98.46
98
101.41
129.75
M R E E . E . G N
151 101 100
156.69
T N E E L A M W S E V A SP U O R O P
31
32
36
159.81
153.78
167
5 10
5 1 2
0 6 1
.& C N O C
E N O T S
10 6
34
95.68
P? I C 4"
153.60
155.55
18 21 17
94.76
97.48
152
142.90
AN R I A D N3 G R E 4 5 1
8 5 1
6 5 1
158
DRAIN INLET
G=152.1
158
20
I=148.2
6 5 1
12 5
156
22 15
4 5 1
126.60
166 165
99.05 96.36 97.65
LP
103
157.05
149.5
143.33
164 Oak
1 5 0
AN R I 154.09 A D N2 G R E - 151.5
151.90
28
154
153.96
4 "
156
149.78
94.78
1 5 2
14 5
C I P ?
24 27
152
26 23
10 5
148
12 5
151.95 151.21
1 5 4
150
1 00
96.34
9 3 . 8
101.63
103.00
5 1 4
1 5 0
103.28 106.75
153
DRAIN INLET
25
146
143.34
5 1 2
10 5. 3 11 4. 0
144
150
98.91
9 97.84 6 . 3
9 4 . 1
HP 155.2
127
128
12 4
149.05
4" CI P?
121.60
130.22
10 4
15 5. 5 13 5. 3
132
129 130
I=144.1
144.86 143.00
1 6 4
G=146.7
C N O C .& S O T N E
S WA L E
143.86
11 9
97.06
G=146.6 I=143.1
119 118 117 115 120
9 5 . 9
97.86
138
98.79
145.69
DRAIN INLET
111 112
E L T K OUT RUN T
156
16 2
142 107
N 67 08 30" W
158
157
1 05. 8
124
143
1 07. 0
123
R WE N. SE SA
101.76
114
I=97.7
101.99
108.35
108.44
134
112
12"
160 134
CUL V RT E
1 0 8
109.14
120
147 144
110.03
122
146 159
162
1 1 6
1 1 4
G=111.03 I=99.83
1 3 2
W
112.76
R=114.21
W
W
S
R=111.79 I=104.0
111.90
11 2
4 1 1
W W
111.71 112.18
2 1 1
111.67
8 1"
C R P
W
11 6
1 1 W 4
G=110.38 I=100.4
G W
112.00
3 "R P 0 C
G G
G =1 35 1 .3 I 0 .3 =1 65
G
CUL E V RT
1 1 2
112.16
S I=106.35
R=112.34
2 1 1
W
112.88
G G
0
Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP One North Broadway White Plains, NY 10601 P: 914.428.0010 F: 914.428.0017
20
40
80
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 REVISED AUGUST 24, 2012
5 1 0
DP-2
W
R " A . E E 8 SN SW
S
R=117.20 I=111.70
1 "S N S W 2 A . E E R
111.56
CE W
1 8" RCP
1 4 1
S
22 1
R=112.07 I=106.1
T
20 1
V RT CUL E
1 W 3 40 " S 1 1
18 1
1 2 0
86 9 .1
1 1 0
161
1 2 2
" 4 W 2 22 S 1 2
1 24
) E RV T P IA I AN ( TR M A E 6 1 "W
) S9 T U R UE Y (O R A WA B O D O T S UH
0 13
T R IA Y " A 8 S N
E E S W R
5 "W 1 6 02 S 1
133
1 32
5 3 .4 =1 1 G 1 . =1 5 I 2
35 6 .9
106
122
131
R =1 25 3 .7 I=126.87
S
T
DP-1
4 13
2 3 .2 =1 1 G 1 .2 =1 3 I 2
R=133.50 I=130.20
0 "W 0 31 1 0 18 S 8 .9
BB-Ex
26 1
125 126
113 109 110
10 4. 0
1 3 8
1 3 6
IA Y NT R " A 8 S
R E E S W
AN M I TR S A E AN M I R W U E TR A E E S R S FW G IH P N O 2 A I 1 "H C TO D O E L A K M R IL FE D W AN M I TR A E R W U E E S R S W P O 2 1 "L
6 13
2 W 40 " 91 S 0
1 0 0
98.04
101.98
154
136
13 4. 0
138 149 145 137
D
143.22
C N O C .& S O T N E
134
1 02
0 . 97
11 4. 0
140
140.40
132
139 141 135 122 124 116
99.30
155
10 3
13 4. 0
138.36
121
108
1 04
AA-2
S WA L E
106 105 104
1 4 0
140.42
135.14 118.86
163 18" 136
105.31
6 14
164.0
1 0"
16 2
154.2
CM
161.5
1 4 2
156.54
78 80
77
76
74 73
B-8
DD
D
79
70 71
62 61
G=161.2
41
0 .9 1 48
0 4 1
33 9 .5
7 52 " N 1 2 0 E
59.38
100
O IN STAT ROAD
150.76
151.35 149.80 151.48 147.45
151.21
D C Q E U T R T N A U L OD C O O
148.39
5 10
150.01
1 0 5
156.12 156.01
5 12
DP-4
5 14
9 .1 2 83
156.32
156.71 156.16
75
x
16 2
1 0 6
1 6 2
1 8 5
62 1
1 6 5
00" W N 76 50
72
1 4 5
D
R=160.90 I=LOCKED
1 2 5
0 12
8 11
4 1 1
x
x
1 1 2
16 2
160
1 1 0
06 1
02 1
x x x x
90
164.86
N OW OR FORM ERLY LA NDS OF I SLER
1 64
0 16
60
x x x
164.89
64 1
62 1
1 6 2
163.81
NOW
x x
64 1
NC. I NGTON ESTATES, RVI LANDS OF I OR FORM ERLY
x x
58 1
54 1
55 54
56
. 5 146 1 05
52 1
4 . 1 45
50 1
48 1
44 1
38 1
40 1
161.84
16" Maple
x x
54 1
49 48
x
8"
Maple
x x
12 6
47
46
45
7 1 0
AA-Ex
R=161.23 I=LOCKED
6 1 0
9 . 91
AN R I A D N1 G R E 40
3 92.
3 92.
x x
10"
38
6 5 1
8 6 .1 =1 0 G 5 .1 =1 8 I 5
x
37 35
CMP
N OW
4 5 1
8 5 1
7 93.
OR FORM ERLY LA NDS OF M cCONN
8 92.
x x
. 90 4 1
16
4 93.
160
19 14
18 5
1 5 6
18 4
147.59
12
14 5
725 CLDRIVE 0.000000 100 5 1 NOGAP
8 92.
8 . 5 9
3 96.
x x
1 425. 9
x
149.71
152
16 4
10 8 7 5 6
150
36" Nut
148
5 1 0
6 14
x x
16 0
1 4 4
4
2 1 3
1 4 2
14 4
0 4 1
18 2 3. 6
4 13
0 13
8 12
44 1
42 1
0 14
1 1 2
8 13
8 11
28 1
126
SA N 8" ER SEW
4 12
8 1 1
8" N. SA R WE SE
7 1 0
1 1 2
9 1 0
THE CONTINUUM COMPANY

Irvington, New York
II. Water Quality Treatment Volume (WQv)
As a project containing portions of redevelopment and new construction, the required water quality volume (WQv) is estimated as a percentage of WQv from the existing, previously untreated, on site area plus 100% of the WQv of the increased impervious area. Table No.1, Existing Drainage Conditions, illustrates a breakdown of the impervious and pervious areas within each subwatershed discharging to each of the design points. Table No. 2, Redeveloped Drainage Conditions, tabulates the proposed conditions of the redeveloped site for The Continuum Company facility. The WQv will be calculated based on the original 1.06 acres of previously untreated impervious area on the current developed site plus the WQv from the 1.3 acres of newly created impervious area.
A. Redevelopment WQv Methodology Per Chapter 9, Redevelopment Projects, of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSSMDM), August 2010, required WQv is calculated using one or more of four separate options. The first option proposes the reduction of impervious cover from existing conditions to redeveloped conditions by 25% or more. In order to meet The Continuum Company facility program, provide circulation, adequate parking and emergency access while generally preserving the existing buffer, it was not feasible to reduce the impervious cover of the site.
The second option for redevelopment WQv calculation proposes that a minimum of 25% of the WQv from the existing disturbed impervious area is captured and treated by the implementation of a NYSDEC standard practice or green infrastructure technique. The 1.3 acres of newly created impervious area would require 100% of its WQv be captured and treated. The proposed redeveloped site will meet the NYSDEC water quality treatment objective using this option.
II 1
The third option allows for the use of alternative practices, sized to meet a minimum of 75% of the water quality volume from the disturbed, impervious area. It is anticipated the stormwater runoff from the existing main house to remain, portion of the drop off circle and entry driveway will be treated by using a hydrodynamic separator, an approved alternative practice by the NYSDEC.
The fourth option proposes a combination of the first three options, allowing for the use of standard and alternative practices. It is anticipated that this option will need be employed.
B. Redevelopment WQv Calculations Refer to Table No. 3, Stormwater Quality Management Measures, for a detailed breakdown of the proposed stormwater management measures to be provided to address stormwater quality management on the project site. The calculations are based on the existing total impervious area on site of 1.06 acres plus the addition of 1.29 acres of impervious area, totaling 2.35 acres under redeveloped conditions, a mixture of redevelopment and new construction.
II 2
TABLE NO. 1
CONTINUUM IRVINGTON, NEW YORK
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS Roof AREA Pavement IMP. TOTAL PERVIOUS

(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID TOTAL
CN
Tc (HRS)
DESIGN POINT #
A 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.28 0.54 3.57 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.85
0.95
1.71
2.66
2.12
4.78 1.18 4.11 0.22
82 68 65 76
0.23 0.07 0.18 0.06
1 2 3 4
TOTAL AREA
3.62
6.66
10.28
4.63 1. Area based on watershed evaluation, including areas upstream of project site. Area w/in PL (ac)= Impervious area w/in PL (ac) = 1.06 2. Total Area used for TR555 Modeling; Water Quality evaluation to be based on area within limit of disturbance 3. CN=Curve Number 4. Tc=Time of Concentration, In TR555 Modeling minimum Tc=0.083 hrs used Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP
725.04 Stormwater Analysis GP505105001.xlsx 8/17/2012
TABLE NO. 2
REDEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
AREA (AC) (1)

(3)
(4)
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID IMPERVIOUS Roof AREA 3.18 0.14 3.61 0.70 2.34 0.04 2.60 0.05 0.96 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.26 0.33 0.33 0.37 1.22 1.99 1.62 0.13 0.13 0.01 1.23 2.19 0.99 Pavement IMP. TOTAL PERVIOUS
(2) (5)
TOTAL
CN
Tc (HRS) 86 96 81 75 62 64 0.21 0.08 0.23 0.14 0.16 0.13
DESIGN POINT #
AA51
1 1 1 2 3 4
AA52
AA5Ex
BB5Ex
CC5Ex
DD
TOTAL AREA
4.91
5.37
10.28
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
2.35 acres Area based on watershed evaluation, including areas upstream of project site. Impervious area w/in PL (ac) = Total Area used for TR555 Modeling; Water Quality evaluation to be based on area within limit of disturbance CN=Curve Number Tc=Time of Concentration, In TR555 Modeling minimum Tc=0.083 hrs used A 2% increase in impervious area in Subbasins AA51 and AA52 are included to address modest design changes in the SPA process Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP
TABLE NO. 3 CONTINUUM IRVINGTON, NEW YORK
STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON6SITE SUMMARY EX AREA IMP (ac) 1.06 PROPOSED AREA IMP TOTAL (ac) (ac) 2.35 4.63 WQv Standard (cft) 0.51 0.40 11,063 Redevel (cft) 7,174 Adjusted WqV After RRv RRv9 Standard Adj RRv Provided Required Provided1 (cft) (cft) (cft) (cft) (cft) 10,525 4,163 5,207 1,966 2,022 Runoff Reduction Volume
ON6SITE CALCs
Rv4
(%) 51
TOTAL SITE
REDEVELOPMENT SELECTION PRACTICES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEASURE Green Infrastructure Measure: Green Roof Rain Garden Stormwater Planter Porous Pavement Stabilized Grass Emg Access Alternative SWM Measures: Hydrodynamic Separator TOTAL 1. Green Roof: depth porosity depth porosity 0.25 0.2 0.17 0.4 S.A. (sf) 2,350 2,275 2,945 1,165 6,450 19,645 5,207 WQv/RRv Add'l WQv (cf) (cf) 242 1,365 2,618 130 853 2,022 2,022
NOTES 1.Stormwater Quality based on redevelopment and new construction. 2.Design per New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, 08/10. 3. I=Impervious Cover (%) 4. Rv = 0.05+0.009(I), Minimum Rv=0.2 5. P=90% Rainfall Event Number 6. P (in) = 1.3 (See Figure 4.1, NYSSMDM, August 2010) 7. S=Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Specific Reduction Factor 8. WQv=[(P)(Rv)(A)]/12; Redevelopment WQv: 25% Ex WQv (using NYSDEC Standard Measures or GI of Ex Imp Area (using NYSDEC Standard or GI RRv Measures) + 100% WQv of Increased Impervious Area. 9. Runoff Reduction Vol, RRv=[(P)(Rv*)(Ai)]/12; per NYSSMDM Chapter 9, meeting RRv is not required for redevelopment projects, but encouraged.
Equivalent Depth:
0.1
Surf Area Stor Vol SWM Measure (sf) (cf) Mem Care 1,400 163 Main Bldg 950 111 2,350
WQv (cf) 144 98 242
2. Rain Garden: Af=WQv x (df) / [k x (hf + df)(tf)] Egr Soil: k=(ft/d) 0.5 depth 2.5 Ponding Depth: Filter Time: porosity 0.2 Gravel: depth 0.67 porosity 0.4 Equivalent Depth: 3. Stormwater Planter: Af=WQv x (df) / [k x (hf + df)(tf)] Egr Soil: k=(ft/d) 4 depth 1.5 Ponding Depth: Filter Time: porosity 0.2 Gravel: depth 1.00 porosity 0.4 Equivalent Depth:
0.5 1.0 1.3
Surf Area Stor Vol SWM Measure (sf) (cf) RG51 925 1,172 RG52 750 950 RG53 600 760 2,275 Surf Area Stor Vol SWM Measure (sf) (cf) Planter51 815 978 Planter52 635 762 Planter53 645 774 Planter54 850 1,020 2,945 Surf Area Stor Vol SWM Measure (sf) (cf) Circle Pkg 590 157 Gar Walk 575 153 1,165
WQv (cf) 555 450 360 1,365 WQv (cf) 724 564 573 756 2,618 WQv (cf) 61 59 120
Equiv Imp Area (sf) 5,393 4,372 3,498 13,263 Equiv Roof Area (sf) 7,039 5,484 5,571 7,341 25,436 Avail Vol (cf) 97 94 Add'l Imp Add'l Area (sf) WQv (cf) 762 10 0 0
0.5 0.2 1.2
4. Porous Pavement: Reservoir: depth porosity
0.67 0.4
Equivalent Depth:
0.3
Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP
III.Runoff Reduction (RRv)
A. Redevelopment Requirements for RRv Chapter 9, Redevelopment Projects, of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSSMDM), August 2010, explains that though encouraged, meeting the Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv) sizing criteria is not required for redevelopment projects.1 Because the redevelopment of the project site includes both redevelopment and new construction, the potential for incorporating green infrastructure techniques to the entire site was evaluated, and it was determined that the site could employ these measures.
B. Redevelopment RRv Calculations The application of green infrastructure techniques is prohibited in certain locations within the proposed limit of disturbance by the existing steep slopes of the site and by the proposed preservation to the maximum extent practicable of existing buffers surrounding the existing developed areas. With these site constraints as justifications for calculating minimum RRv, it is estimated that the minimum volume reduction using green infrastructure techniques with RRv capacity is approximately 4,200 cubic feet for the entire study watershed area. Due to the hydrologic soil group (HSG) B and the site limitations, the NYSDEC considers a minimum of 40% of the RRv to be an acceptable threshold. Though the goal would be to meet 100% of the RRv, an estimated 5,200 cubic feet of RRv is provided, which is greater than the minimum required by NYSDEC and equal to approximately 50% of the 100% RRv. The following is a summary of the breakdown of the on site green infrastructure techniques proposed.
The proposed redevelopment of the site will provide for the implementation of green roofs, rain gardens (incorporating elements of bioretention practices), stormwater planters and porous pavement as its green infrastructure techniques to address stormwater volume
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, August 2010, page 9 4. RRv requirements pertain to new construction portions of the redevelopment project.
III 1
reduction. The green infrastructure techniques are placed to disconnect impervious areas, increase flow paths and minimize stormwater runoff.
Though NYSDEC does not require that redevelopment portions of projects meet RRv requirements, the portion of the project that would qualify as redevelopment, approximately 1.06 acres of impervious area, when combined with the new construction portion, approximately an additional 1.3 acres of impervious area will meet or exceed the calculated minimum RRv values if all impervious area were to be considered new construction.
The water quality volume (WQv) requirements, estimated to be approximately 7,175 cubic feet, have been substantially met with the use of these green infrastructure techniques with RRv capacity provided. Two hydrodynamic separators are proposed to treat the stormwater runoff from the roof of the existing house and partial drop off area and from the existing entry driveway. These alternative measures, when combined with the green infrastructure techniques employed on the rest of the site, will meet the WQv requirements for the project.
III 2
IV. Adjusted Water Quality Volume (WQv)
A. Standard Stormwater Management Practices (SMPs) The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSSMDM), August 2010, outlines the standard stormwater management practices (SMPs) that can be evaluated for use as stormwater quality measures. The acceptable practices area divided into five broad groups as follows: I. II. III. IV. V. Stormwater Ponds Stormwater Wetlands Infiltration Practices Filtering Practices Open Channel Practices
Due to the existing surrounding slopes, the topography of the site and the proposed preservation of existing buffers to the maximum extent practicable, ponds, wetlands, infiltration and open channel practices are not acceptable SMPs for the project site.
B. Alternative Practices Accepted by the NYSDEC As previously discussed, on redevelopment projects the NYSDEC allows for the use of accepted verified manufactured technologies alternative practices, sized to meet a minimum of 75% of the water quality volume from the disturbed, impervious area. An acceptable alternative practice is a hydrodynamic separator, a preferred choice when there is the lack of space for a standard SMP or green infrastructure technique. Due to the proposed use of green infrastructure techniques such as porous pavement and rain gardens, over 70% of the WQv requirements have been met, but additional practices are required to meet minimum water quality volume (WQv) requirements, therefore a hydrodynamic separator is proposed for The Continuum Company facility project at the main house/drop off circle and at the entry drive.
IV 1
V. Water Quantity Control Through the use of the suggested site planning methods and planned green infrastructure techniques at the proposed redeveloped site, stormwater runoff reduction results mitigate proposed peak rates of runoff from the site. The proposed measures allow for stormwater runoff storage and infiltration for smaller storm events with overflow control structures to discharge larger storm events in a controlled manner at rates equal to or less than existing conditions. In Subwatersheds DP 2, DP 3 and DP 4, with the modified subwatershed boundaries and reduction in impervious surfaces, it is estimated that the peak rates of runoff from the proposed developed site are equal to or less than existing conditions.
In order to meet the program requirements of the on site facility, the proposed buildings were generally located along the open space areas and within the vicinity of the existing buildings. The reconfigured subwatershed discharging to DP 1 was increased by approximately 2.15 acres across the entire study watershed. To provide peak rates of runoff from this DP for each 24 hour storm event up to and including the 100 year storm event to be at or below existing conditions, underground detention pipes1 are proposed along the eastern edge of the loading dock and emergency access road.
Table 4, Stormwater Quantity Design Flow Summary, outlines the existing flow rates at each DP for the 1 year through the 100 year 24 hour storm events. Also included are the anticipated design flow rates for the improved redeveloped site and a delta indicating that at each DP for each storm event the proposed peak rate of runoff is at or below existing conditions.
Where applicable, channel protection volume (CPv), Overbank Flood (Qp) and Extreme Storm (Qf) considerations have been provided, consistent with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSSMDM), August 2010 thereby meeting the Village of
1
Full detention is not recommended in the subwatershed due to the delayed timing of the release of each storm event into
the downstream off site storm drainage system that connects to the Barney Brook which has historic evidence of causing flooding conditions. A preferable option would be to release the runoff from the site before the confluence of upstream drainage areas to this section of the Barney Brook.
V1
Irvington stormwater management requirements. CPv, estimated to be 0.25 acre feet, is accommodated in the underground detention pipes which for the 1 year storm event has a storage volume of 0.29 acre feet, in excess of the CPv. Qp addresses the control of the peak discharge of the 10 year storm event to at or below predevelopment rates. For design point DP1, the existing 10 year storm event peak rate of flow is estimated to be 12.8 cubic feet per second (cfs) and under redeveloped conditions is approximated to be 10.7 cfs; thereby meeting the Qp requirements. Qf addresses the control of the peak discharge of the 100 year storm event to at or below predevelopment rates. For design point DP1, the existing 100 year storm event peak rate of flow is estimated to be 22.1 cubic feet per second (cfs) and under redeveloped conditions is approximated to be 21.8 cfs; thereby meeting the Qf requirements. The detention pipes safely pass the 100 year storm event.
Refer to Table 5, Stormwater Management Basin Summary, for a hydrologic analysis of the detention pipes modeled as part of the overall study watershed analysis.
V2
STORMWATER QUANTITY DESIGN FLOW SUMMARY
DESIGN POINT NO. Runoff Volume Detention Time (CFT) (HRS) 2.8 4.5 3.5 5.0 6.0 SW Flow (CFS) SW Flow (CFS) SW Flow (CFS) SW Flow (CFS)
16YEAR 56YEAR 106YEAR 256YEAR
26YEAR
(2)
506YEAR SW Flow (CFS) 7.0
1006YEAR SW Flow (CFS) 7.5
(3)
SW Flow (CFS)
Westchester County Rainfall
(IN) (1) 5.06 3.89 51.17 21,214 28,377 7,164 Detention Pipes: 24.0 hrs 7.45 5.73 51.72 11.01 8.49 52.52 12.83 10.66 52.17 16.51 15.51 51.00 20.21 19.54 50.67 22.06 21.79 50.27
Existing Redeveloped Delta
2 Not Required
0.56 0.54 50.02
2,265 2,134 5131
1.06 0.88 50.18
1.87 1.41 50.46
2.31 1.68 50.63
3.24 2.25 50.99
4.21 2.84 51.37
4.71 3.13 51.58
3 Not Required
1.13 0.46 50.67
6,229 3,049 53,180
2.47 1.20 51.27
4.79 2.58 52.21
6.07 3.35 52.72
8.85 5.05 53.80
11.80 6.88 54.92
13.34 7.84 55.50
0.20 0.01 50.19
697 44 5653
Not Required
0.31 0.03 50.28
0.49 0.06 50.43
0.58 0.07 50.51
0.77 0.11 50.66
0.96 0.15 50.81
1.06 0.17 50.89
(1) Westchester County Rainfall, NYSDEC Amendment NY51, November 7, 1990, page 2514.5 (2) Qp(cfs)=Control the peak discharge from the 105year storm to 105year predevelopment rates.
(3) Qf(cfs)=Control the peak discharge from the 1005year storm to 1005year predevelopment rates. Safely pass the 1005year storm event.
TABLE NO. 5
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID
16YEAR
26YEAR
56YEAR
106YEAR
256YEAR
506YEAR
1006YEAR
OUTLET CONTORL STRUCTURE
HWE(1) SV(2) HWE(1) SV(2) HWE(1) SV(2) HWE(1) SV(2) HWE(1) SV(2) HWE(1) SV(2) HWE(1) SV(2)
Detention Pipes: Orifice/Weir: 6' Diameter (1) 1.5"d @ 140.0' Bottom: 140.00' (2) 8"d @ 142.75 142.83 Top: 146.00' 6' weir @ 145.5' Length: 975' 0.29 143.07 0.33 143.56 0.39 143.89 0.43 0.29 0.33 0.39 0.43
144.67
0.53
145.65
0.62
145.86
0.63
TOTAL
0.53
0.62
0.63
(1)
High Water Elevation (Feet)
(2)
Storage Volume (Acre Feet)
(3)
Channel Protection Volume (Acre Feet), CPv: 0.25 < 15yr storage volume in detention pipes
VI. Erosion & Sediment Control As described in the NYSDEC NYSSMDM, in order to protect the waters of the State of New York from adverse impacts of urban stormwater runoff, the typical objectives of stormwater management in redeveloped and newly developed areas include reducing the potential of flooding, flood damage, erosion, and water quality degradation.
The following are proposed temporary and permanent stormwater management measures that are NYSDEC accepted methods and are designed to address these objectives.
A. Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Measures During construction practices, the objective of stormwater management is to minimize soil and sediment leaving the site. The following methods are proposed to achieve this goal:
Limit and control the exposure of soil to the extent that can be managed. Install silt fencing, hay bales, inlet protection, sediment traps, swales, berms, energy dissipaters, wheel wash down areas, anti tracking pads, mulching and seeding. These methods will be regularly maintained and periodically inspected.
Divert offsite stormwater runoff. Meet NYSDEC New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control requirements and the Village of Irvington requirements as outlined in their Town Code, Chapter 183, Stormwater Management.
The NYSDEC General Permit GP 0 10 001 has limitations on the extent of soil disturbance to be no more than five acres maximum at any one time, without prior written approval from the municipality, the operators of a NYSDEC regulated Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s). Each disturbed area must be temporarily or permanently stabilized with vegetative or manufactured measures before disturbing another area. It is not anticipated that for this project that the limit of disturbance would exceed five acres and therefore will not be subject to additional approval by the regulated MS4.
VI 1
B. Maintenance of Permanent Erosion & Sediment Control Measures In accordance with the NYSDEC and the Village of Irvington requirements, regular maintenance of the site infrastructure will be performed by The Continuum Company. Stormwater management inspections and maintenance of permanent structures will be performed on a regular basis as is outlined in the following table or as required after a significant storm event. Table No. 6 Stormwater Management Inspections & Maintenance of Permanent Structures Minimum Inspection Frequency Semi Annually
Structure Or Practice Paved Areas
Conditions to be Identified Pavement Damage Weeds, Sediment Accumulation Sediment Accumulation
Maintenance Required Repair or repave; Remove sand
Rain Gardens, Stormwater Planters Porous Pavment
Monthly
Mulch and weed with landscaping, Remove sediment when storage capacity reduced by 10% or + Vacuum sweep and high pressure jet power wash to prevent clogging. Avoid use of sand as a de icer. Regrade & vegetate as necessary Remove debris when cross sectional area of pipe is reduced by 10% or + Remove sediment min. of 2x year or when storage reduced by 10% or + Remove sediment when storage capacity reduced by 10% or + or after every 5yr storm event (4.5)
Quarterly
Vegetated Areas Drainage Pipes
Monthly Monthly
Erosion Debris Accumulation Sediment Accumulation Sediment Accumulation
Catch Basins, Monthly Inlets & Manholes Detention Pipes Semi Annually
As outlined in the Village of Irvington Town Code, Chapter 183, Stormwater Management, a formal maintenance agreement and guarantee will be established between The Continuum Company and the Village of Irvington.
VI 2
THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT APPENDIX
Prepared for: The Continuum Company LLC 590 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10022 Prepared by: Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP One North Broadway, Suite 1407 White Plains, NY 10601
September 9, 2011 Revised September 24, 2012
THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT TECHNICAL APPENDIX
I.
METHODOLOGY A. B. C. D. E. Zero Increase in Watershed Peak Runoff Storm Frequencies Technical Approach Detention Requirements Rainfall Intensity
II.
CALCULATIONS A. Stormwater Quantity 1. Curve Numbers 2. Times of Concentration B. Pond Pack Models 1. Existing Conditions 2. Developed Conditions
I. METHODOLOGY
A. METHODOLOGY
1.
Zero Increase in Watershed Peak Runoff
In accordance with standard development practices, the peak rate of stormwater discharge from the site after the completion of development shall not exceed the estimated pre development peak discharge.
2. Storm Frequencies
The storm frequencies to be used as a basis for computing peak rate of discharge shall be storms expected once every 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years with a duration of 24 hours as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service.
3. Technical Approach
The method used for estimating peak discharge shall be as per the document released by the Engineering Division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service titled Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release No. 55, dated June 1986, Type III Storm Distribution. This criterion governs the data that is input into the software, namely the Haestead Methods Quick TR 55 computer program. A summary of the flows under existing and proposed conditions is provided. The complete input and output data is available upon request.
4. Detention Requirements
The continuity equation and level pool reservoir routing methods1 are used to route watershed inflow hydrographs through the stormwater management basins. The measures
Soil Conservation Service, Technical Release 55, 1986, Chapter 6.
A1
have been designed with gentle slopes so that NYSDEC approved plant cover can be maintained consistent with the existing landscape.
5. Rainfall Intensity
Frequency and intensities, which have been used in this report, are as follows:
WESTCHESTER COUNTY RAINFALL INTENSITY BY STORM FREQUENCY2 Storm Frequency Year 100 50 25 10 5 2 1 Rainfall Intensity (24 Hour Period) (Inches) 7.5 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 3.5 2.8
Westchester County Rainfall, NYSDEC
A2
II.
CALCULATIONS
II. A. STORMWATER QUANTITY
APPENDIX TABLE NO. 1 CONTINUUM IRVINGTON, NEW YORK
EXISTING CONDITIONS CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATIONS
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID
HYDRO LOGIC GROUP B B

1
COVER TYPE
2
HYDRO LOGIC COND. Good Good

3
HSG Specific Reduction Factor, S4
TOTAL AREA (AC) 2.12 2.66 4.78 0.23 0.62 0.34 1.18 2.66 0.91 0.54 4.11 0.13 0.09 0.22
IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA (AC) 0.00 2.66 2.66 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.09 0.09 CN 98 98
5
PERVIOUS AREA AREA (AC) 2.12 0.00 2.12 0.23 0.62 0.00 0.85 2.66 0.91 0.00 3.57 0.13 0.00 0.13 CN 61
5
A x CN 0.00 260.24 260.24 0.00 0.00 33.05 33.05 0.00 0.00 52.81 52.81 0.00 8.80 8.80
A x CN 129.29 0.00 129.29 13.76 34.13 0.00 47.89 162.19 49.93 0.00 212.12 7.66 0.00 7.66
WEIGHTED CN
A TOTAL: B
Open Space Impervious
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
61 98 82 61 55 98 68 61 55 98 65 61 98 76
B B B
Open Space Woods Impervious
Good Good Good
98 98 98
61 55
TOTAL: C B B B Open Space Woods Impervious Good Good Good
98 98 98
61 55
TOTAL: D TOTAL: B B Open Space Impervious Good Good
98 98
61
1. Hydrologic Soil Group classification, see Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 2. S=Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Specific Reduction Factor 2. Cover Type as listed per Tables 2<2a.<c.<Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR<55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2<5. 3. Hydrologic Condition either Poor, Fair or Good per Tables 2<2a.<c.<Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR<55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2<5. 4. Specific Reduction factors for the HSGs per NYSSMDM, Chapter 4, Section 4.3:
HSG HSG HSG HSG
A B C D
0.55 0.40 0.30 0.20
5. CN values from Tables 2<2a.<c.<Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR<55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2<5.
725.04 Stormwater Analysis GP<0<10<001.xlsx8/17/2012
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATIONS
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID
HYDRO LOGIC GROUP B B

1
COVER TYPE
2
HYDRO LOGIC COND. Good Good

3
HSG Specific Reduction Factor, S

4
TOTAL AREA (AC) 0.99 2.19 3.18 0.01 0.13 0.14 1.62 1.99 3.61 <0.04 0.41 0.33 0.70 1.29 1.04 0.26 2.60 0.04 0.00 0.05
IMPERVIOUS AREA AREA (AC) CN 0.00 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 1.99 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 98 98
5
PERVIOUS AREA AREA (AC) CN 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.01 0.00 0.01 1.62 0.00 1.62 <0.04 0.41 0.00 0.37 1.29 1.04 0.00 2.34 0.04 0.00 0.04 61
5
A x CN 0.00 214.60 214.60 0.00 12.61 12.61 0.00 195.19 195.19 0.00 0.00 32.50 32.50 0.00 0.00 25.77 25.77 0.00 0.40 0.40
A x CN 60.41 0.00 60.41 0.48 0.00 0.48 98.72 0.00 98.72 <2.31 22.59 0.00 20.28 78.92 57.47 0.00 136.40 2.59 0.00 2.59
WEIGHTED CN
AA 1 TOTAL: AA 2 TOTAL: AA Ex TOTAL: BB Ex
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.24 0.40 0.40 0.40
61 98 86 61 98 96 61 98 81 61 55 98 75 61 55 98 62 61 98 64
B B
Good Good
98 98
61
B B
Good Good
98 98
61
B B B
Open Space Woods Impervious
Good Good Good
98 98 98
61 55
TOTAL: CC Ex B B B Open Space Woods Impervious Good Good Good
98 98 98
61 55
TOTAL: DD TOTAL: B B Open Space Impervious Good Good
98 98
61
1. Hydrologic Soil Group classification, see Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 2. S=Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Specific Reduction Factor 2. Cover Type as listed per Tables 2<2a.<c.<Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR<55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2<5. 3. Hydrologic Condition either Poor, Fair or Good per Tables 2<2a.<c.<Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR<55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2<5. 4. Specific Reduction factors for the HSGs per NYSSMDM, Chapter 4, Section 4.3:
HSG A
0.55
725.04 Stormwater Analysis GP<0<10<001.xlsx8/17/2012
EXISTING TIME OF CONCENTRATION (OR TRAVEL TIME)
SHEET FLOW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Surface Description (See Table Below) Mannings Roughness Coefficient n Flow Length (Total L<100FT) L 2 P2 20YR 240HR Rainfall Land Slope s Travel Time Tt Tt = (0.007(nL)0.8)/(P20.5*s0.4)
1
ft in ft/ft hr
A 6 0.24 100 3.5 0.02 0.23
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID B C 6 6 0.24 0.24 38 100 3.5 3.5 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.16
D 6 0.24 34 3.5 0.08 0.06
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Surface Description (paved or unpaved) Flow Length L Watercourse Slope s V Average Velocity 3 Tt Tt = L / 3600V unpaved 128 0.19 7.0 0.01 unpaved 170 0.24 7.7 0.01 unpaved 153 0.06 4.0 0.01 unpaved 223 0.25 8.0 0.01 paved 21 0.05 4.6 0.00
ft ft/ft ft/s hr
CHANNEL FLOW 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Cross Sectional Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Hydraulic Radius, r = a/pw Channel Slope 4 Manning's Roughness Coefficient Velocity = (1.49r2/3s1/2)/n Flow Length Tt = L / 3600V a pw r s n V L Tt Tc ft2 ft ft ft/ft ft/s ft hr hr 4.17 20.42 0.20 0.06 0.013 9.93 64 0.00 4.17 20.42 0.20 0.02 0.013 6.09 213 0.01 0.20 1.57 0.13 0.01 0.013 3.40 71 0.01
TOTAL WATERSHED Tc
0.23
0.07
0.18
0.06
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4
ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS (Manning's n) FOR SHEET FLOW 1 Smooth (conc, asphalt, gravel, bare soil) 0.011 Fallow (no residue) 0.05 0.06 Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover < 20% Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover > 20% 0.17 Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grass 0.24 Bermuda Grass 0.41 Range (natural) 0.13 Woods (light) 0.4 Table 301. 0 Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for SHEET FLOW, TR055 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, page 303. Westchester County Rainfall, NYSDEC Amendment NY01, November 7, 1990, page 2014.5 Figure 301. 0 Average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow, TR055 Urban Hydrology forSmall Watersheds, page 302. Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for CHANNEL FLOW. See Handbook of Hydraulics or equal.
DEVELOPED TIME OF CONCENTRATION (OR TRAVEL TIME)
SHEET FLOW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Surface Description (See Table Below) Mannings Roughness Coefficient n Flow Length (Total L<100FT) L 2 P2 20YR 240HR Rainfall Land Slope s Travel Time Tt Tt = (0.007(nL)0.8)/(P20.5*s0.4)
1
ft in ft/ft hr
AA01 6 0.24 76 3.5 0.02 0.20
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID AA0Ex BB0Ex CC0Ex 6 6 6 0.24 0.24 0.24 100 30 56 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.23 0.12 0.15
DD 6 0.24 86 3.5 0.06 0.13
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Surface Description (paved or unpaved) Flow Length L Watercourse Slope s V Average Velocity 3 Tt Tt = L / 3600V Unpaved 114 0.02 2.20 0.01 Unpaved 128 0.19 7.00 0.01 Unpaved 155 0.22 7.50 0.01 Unpaved 194 0.30 9.00 0.01
ft ft/ft ft/s hr
CHANNEL FLOW 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Cross Sectional Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Hydraulic Radius, r = a/pw Channel Slope 4 Manning's Roughness Coefficient Velocity = (1.49r2/3s1/2)/n Flow Length Tt = L / 3600V a pw r s n V L Tt Tc ft2 ft ft ft/ft ft/s ft hr hr 1.23 3.93 0.31 0.06 0.013 12.99 132 0.00 4.17 20.42 0.20 0.06 0.013 9.93 64 0.00 4.17 20.42 0.20 0.02 0.013 6.09 213 0.01
TOTAL WATERSHED Tc
0.21
0.23
0.14
0.16
0.13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4
ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS (Manning's n) FOR SHEET FLOW 1 Smooth (conc, asphalt, gravel, bare soil) 0.011 Fallow (no residue) 0.05 0.06 Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover < 20% Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover > 20% 0.17 Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grass 0.24 Bermuda Grass 0.41 Range (natural) 0.13 Woods (light & dense) 0.4 Table 301. 0 Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for SHEET FLOW, TR055 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, page 303. Westchester County Rainfall, NYSDEC Amendment NY01, November 7, 1990, page 2014.5 Figure 301. 0 Average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow, TR055 Urban Hydrology forSmall Watersheds, page 302. Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for CHANNEL FLOW. See Handbook of Hydraulics or equal.
CHANNEL PROTECTION VOLUME
Q1 BASIN ID Ia/P(1) Tc (hrs) qu(2) (qu/qi)(3) Vs/Vr(4) (csm/in) (in)
Required Volume Vs(5)=Cpv (ac0ft) Vs(5)=Cpv (cft)
AA01
0.11
0.21
550
0.030
0.64
1.5
0.25
11,053
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
10Year Storm Event, P (in) = 2.8 Exhibit 40III, TR055 T=24 hours, Figure 8.5, MDE 2000; p807 NYSDEC Design Manual, April 2008 Vs/Vr=0.68301.43(qo/qi)+1.64(qo/qi)200.804(qo/qi)3 Vs=(Vs/Vr)*Q*A/12
II. B.
POND PACK MODELS
II. B. 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS
DP 4
Subw atershed D
DP 3 C to DP 3 Subw atershed A Subw atershed C
D to DP 4
B to
DP 1
to
DP 2
DP 2
Subw atershed B
DP
Type.... Master Network Summary
Page 1.01
Name.... Watershed File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 11-08-26 Existing.ppw
MASTER DESIGN STORM SUMMARY Network Storm Collection: Westchester Coun
Return Event -----------1 2 5 10 25 50 100
Total Depth in -----2.8000 3.5000 4.5000 5.0000 6.0000 7.0000 7.5000
Rainfall Type ---------------Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve
RNF ID ---------------TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr
MASTER NETWORK SUMMARY SCS Unit Hydrograph Method (*Node=Outfall; +Node=Diversion;) (Trun= HYG Truncation: Blank=None; L=Left; R=Rt; LR=Left&Rt)
Return Node ID Type Event ----------------- ---- -----*DP 1 JCT 1 *DP 1 JCT 2 *DP 1 JCT 5 *DP 1 JCT 10 *DP 1 JCT 25 *DP 1 JCT 50 *DP 1 JCT 100 *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.487 .710 1.050 1.227 1.588 1.958 2.146 .052 .089 .151 .185 .258 .335 .376
Qpeak hrs --------12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1166 12.1166 12.1083 12.1083 12.1083 12.1083 12.1083
Qpeak cfs -------5.06 7.45 11.01 12.83 16.51 20.21 22.06 .56 1.06 1.87 2.31 3.24 4.21 4.71
Max WSEL ft --------
Max Pond Storage ac-ft ------------
S/N: Bentley PondPack (10.01.04.00) 9:52 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/7/2011
Page 1.02
Return Node ID Type Event ----------------- ---- -----*DP 3 JCT 1 *DP 3 JCT 2 *DP 3 JCT 5 *DP 3 JCT 10 *DP 3 JCT 25 *DP 3 JCT 50 *DP 3 JCT 100 *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 A A A A A A A B B B B B B B JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.143 .258 .456 .566 .805 1.063 1.197 .016 .025 .039 .046 .062 .078 .086 .487 .710 1.050 1.227 1.588 1.958 2.146 .052 .089 .151 .185 .258 .335 .376
Qpeak hrs --------12.1916 12.1666 12.1666 12.1500 12.1500 12.1416 12.1416 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1166 12.1166 12.1083 12.1083 12.1083 12.1083 12.1083
Qpeak cfs -------1.13 2.47 4.79 6.07 8.85 11.80 13.34 .20 .31 .49 .58 .77 .96 1.06 5.06 7.45 11.01 12.83 16.51 20.21 22.06 .56 1.06 1.87 2.31 3.24 4.21 4.71
SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED
Page 1.03
Node ID ----------------SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED C SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED D D D D D D D
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA
Return Event -----1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.143 .258 .456 .566 .805 1.063 1.197 .016 .025 .039 .046 .062 .078 .086
Qpeak hrs --------12.1916 12.1666 12.1666 12.1500 12.1500 12.1416 12.1416 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000 12.1000
Qpeak cfs -------1.13 2.47 4.79 6.07 8.85 11.80 13.34 .20 .31 .49 .58 .77 .96 1.06
II. B. 2. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
DP 4
CC Ex AA 1
DP 3
CC
to Ex
DP
Subw atershed DD AA 1 to DetnPipe UG Detention AA 2 AA to DP1
BB Ex
AA
to
DP 2
BB
to Ex
DP
DP
DP 1 AA Ex to DP1
DD to DP 4 AA Ex
Page 1.01
Name.... Watershed File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw
MASTER DESIGN STORM SUMMARY Network Storm Collection: Westchester Coun
Return Event -----------1 2 5 10 25 50 100
Total Depth in -----2.8000 3.5000 4.5000 5.0000 6.0000 7.0000 7.5000
Rainfall Type ---------------Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve
RNF ID ---------------TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr
Node ID ----------------AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA
Return Event -----1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.396 .556 .796 .919 1.168 1.422 1.550 .027 .035 .047 .053 .064 .076 .082
Qpeak hrs --------12.1583 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.0833 12.0916 12.1000 12.0916 12.1000 12.0916 12.0916
Qpeak cfs -------4.25 5.97 8.49 9.76 12.29 14.82 16.08 .31 .40 .52 .58 .70 .82 .88
Page 1.02
Node ID ----------------AA-EX AA-EX AA-EX AA-EX AA-EX AA-EX AA-EX BB-EX BB-EX BB-EX BB-EX BB-EX BB-EX BB-EX CC-EX CC-EX CC-EX CC-EX CC-EX CC-EX CC-EX *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT
Return Event -----1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.349 .514 .767 .898 1.168 1.446 1.586 .049 .076 .120 .143 .191 .242 .268 .070 .133 .247 .312 .453 .607 .688 .771 1.104 1.608 1.868 2.400 2.942 3.216
Qpeak hrs --------12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1166 12.2000 12.1583 12.1583 12.1416 12.1416 12.1416 12.1416 12.1750 12.1750 12.1750 12.2333 12.1750 12.1750 12.3166
Qpeak cfs -------3.61 5.38 8.05 9.41 12.18 14.97 16.36 .54 .88 1.41 1.68 2.25 2.84 3.13 .46 1.20 2.58 3.35 5.05 6.88 7.84 3.89 5.73 8.49 10.66 15.51 19.54 21.79
Page 1.03
Return Node ID Type Event ----------------- ---- -----*DP 2 JCT 1 *DP 2 JCT 2 *DP 2 JCT 5 *DP 2 JCT 10 *DP 2 JCT 25 *DP 2 JCT 50 *DP 2 JCT 100 *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 DD DD DD DD DD DD DD JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.049 .076 .120 .143 .191 .242 .268 .070 .133 .247 .312 .453 .607 .688 .001 .003 .005 .007 .009 .012 .014 .001 .003 .005 .007 .009 .012 .014
Qpeak hrs --------12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1333 12.1166 12.2000 12.1583 12.1583 12.1416 12.1416 12.1416 12.1416 12.1083 12.1166 12.1083 12.1166 12.1083 12.1166 12.1166 12.1083 12.1166 12.1083 12.1166 12.1083 12.1166 12.1166
Qpeak cfs -------.54 .88 1.41 1.68 2.25 2.84 3.13 .46 1.20 2.58 3.35 5.05 6.88 7.84 .01 .03 .06 .07 .11 .15 .17 .01 .03 .06 .07 .11 .15 .17
SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED SUBWATERSHED
Page 1.04
Node ID ----------------UG DETENTION IN UG DETENTION IN UG DETENTION IN UG DETENTION IN UG DETENTION IN UG DETENTION IN UG DETENTION IN UG UG UG UG UG UG UG DETENTION DETENTION DETENTION DETENTION DETENTION DETENTION DETENTION OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT
Type ---POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND
Return Event -----1 2 5 10 25 50 100 1 2 5 10 25 50 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.396 .556 .796 .919 1.168 1.422 1.550 .394 .555 .795 .918 1.167 1.421 1.548
Qpeak hrs --------12.1583 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 12.1500 17.4749 13.4333 12.5833 12.5500 12.5166 12.4500 12.3416
Qpeak cfs -------4.25 5.97 8.49 9.76 12.29 14.82 16.08 .13 .60 2.43 3.13 4.36 6.59 9.96
142.83 143.07 143.56 143.89 144.67 145.65 145.86
.293 .325 .391 .434 .529 .618 .629
Type.... Design Storms Name.... Westchester Coun
Page 2.01
File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw
Title... Project Project Project Project
Date: 8/24/2011 Engineer: malfaro Title: Watershed Comments: DESIGN STORMS SUMMARY
Design Storm File,ID =
Westchester Coun
Storm Tag Name = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeIII 24hr Storm Frequency = 1 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 2.8000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs
Storm Tag Name = 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeIII 24hr Storm Frequency = 2 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 3.5000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Storm Tag Name = 5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeIII 24hr Storm Frequency = 5 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 4.5000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Storm Tag Name = 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeIII 24hr Storm Frequency = 10 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 5.0000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs
Type.... Design Storms Name.... Westchester Coun
Page 2.02
Title... Project Project Project Project
Date: 8/24/2011 Engineer: malfaro Title: Watershed Comments: DESIGN STORMS SUMMARY
Design Storm File,ID =
Westchester Coun
Type.... Unit Hyd. Summary
Page 3.01
Name.... AA-1 Tag: 1 Event: 1 yr File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw Storm... TypeIII 24hr Tag: 1
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 1 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 2.8000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - AA-1 1 Tc = .2100 hrs Drainage Area = 3.180 acres Runoff CN= 86 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .02800 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1520 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 4.26 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1582 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 4.25 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-1 CN = 86 Area = 3.180 acres S = 1.6279 in 0.2S = .3256 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------1.4925 in .396 ac-ft HYG Volume... .396 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
***** SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH PARAMETERS ***** Time Concentration, Tc = Computational Incr, Tm = .21000 hrs (ID: AA-1) .02800 hrs = 0.20000 Tp
Unit Hyd. Shape Factor = 483.432 (37.46% under rising limb) K = 483.43/645.333, K = .7491 (also, K = 2/(1+(Tr/Tp)) Receding/Rising, Tr/Tp = 1.6698 (solved from K = .7491) Unit peak, Unit peak time Unit receding limb, Total unit time, qp Tp Tr Tb = = = = 17.16 .14000 .56000 .70000 cfs hrs hrs hrs
Page 3.02
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 10 Duration = Rain Dir = Rain File -ID = Unit Hyd Type = HYG Dir = HYG File - ID = Tc = Drainage Area = year storm 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 5.0000 in J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - TypeIII 24hr Default Curvilinear J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - AA-1 10 .2100 hrs 3.180 acres Runoff CN= 86
============================================ Computational Time Increment = .02800 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1520 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 9.77 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1498 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 9.76 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-1 CN = 86 Area = 3.180 acres S = 1.6279 in 0.2S = .3256 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------3.4670 in .919 ac-ft HYG Volume... .919 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.03
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 100 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 7.5000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - AA-1 100 Tc = .2100 hrs Drainage Area = 3.180 acres Runoff CN= 86 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .02800 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1520 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 16.11 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1498 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 16.08 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-1 CN = 86 Area = 3.180 acres S = 1.6279 in 0.2S = .3256 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------5.8476 in 1.550 ac-ft HYG Volume... 1.550 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.04
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 1 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 2.8000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - AA-2 1 Tc = .0833 hrs Drainage Area = .140 acres Runoff CN= 96 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01111 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1000 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .31 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.0998 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .31 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-2 CN = 96 Area = .140 acres S = .4167 in 0.2S = .0833 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------2.3554 in .027 ac-ft HYG Volume... .027 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.05
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 10 Duration = Rain Dir = Rain File -ID = Unit Hyd Type = HYG Dir = HYG File - ID = Tc = Drainage Area = year storm 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 5.0000 in J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - TypeIII 24hr Default Curvilinear J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - AA-2 10 .0833 hrs .140 acres Runoff CN= 96
============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01111 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1000 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .58 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.0998 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .58 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-2 CN = 96 Area = .140 acres S = .4167 in 0.2S = .0833 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------4.5326 in .053 ac-ft HYG Volume... .053 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.06
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 100 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 7.5000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - AA-2 100 Tc = .0833 hrs Drainage Area = .140 acres Runoff CN= 96 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01111 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1000 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .88 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.0998 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .88 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-2 CN = 96 Area = .140 acres S = .4167 in 0.2S = .0833 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------7.0222 in .082 ac-ft HYG Volume... .082 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.07
Name.... AA-EX Tag: 1 Event: 1 yr File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw Storm... TypeIII 24hr Tag: 1
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 1 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 2.8000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - AA-EX 1 Tc = .2300 hrs Drainage Area = 3.610 acres Runoff CN= 81 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .03067 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1747 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 3.61 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1748 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 3.61 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-EX CN = 81 Area = 3.610 acres S = 2.3457 in 0.2S = .4691 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------1.1617 in .349 ac-ft HYG Volume... .349 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
***** SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH PARAMETERS ***** Time Concentration, Tc = Computational Incr, Tm = .23000 hrs (ID: AA-EX) .03067 hrs = 0.20000 Tp
Page 3.08
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 10 Duration = Rain Dir = Rain File -ID = Unit Hyd Type = HYG Dir = HYG File - ID = Tc = Drainage Area = year storm 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 5.0000 in J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - TypeIII 24hr Default Curvilinear J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - AA-EX 10 .2300 hrs 3.610 acres Runoff CN= 81
============================================ Computational Time Increment = .03067 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1747 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 9.41 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1748 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 9.41 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-EX CN = 81 Area = 3.610 acres S = 2.3457 in 0.2S = .4691 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------2.9853 in .898 ac-ft HYG Volume... .898 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.09
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 100 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 7.5000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - AA-EX 100 Tc = .2300 hrs Drainage Area = 3.610 acres Runoff CN= 81 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .03067 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1747 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 16.37 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1748 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 16.36 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:AA-EX CN = 81 Area = 3.610 acres S = 2.3457 in 0.2S = .4691 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------5.2720 in 1.586 ac-ft HYG Volume... 1.586 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.10
Name.... BB-EX Tag: 1 Event: 1 yr File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw Storm... TypeIII 24hr Tag: 1
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 1 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 2.8000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - BB-EX 1 Tc = .1400 hrs Drainage Area = .700 acres Runoff CN= 75 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01867 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1333 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .54 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1332 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .54 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:BB-EX CN = 75 Area = .700 acres S = 3.3333 in 0.2S = .6667 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------.8325 in .049 ac-ft HYG Volume... .049 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
***** SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH PARAMETERS ***** Time Concentration, Tc = Computational Incr, Tm = .14000 hrs (ID: BB-EX) .01867 hrs = 0.20000 Tp
Page 3.11
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 10 Duration = Rain Dir = Rain File -ID = Unit Hyd Type = HYG Dir = HYG File - ID = Tc = Drainage Area = year storm 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 5.0000 in J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - TypeIII 24hr Default Curvilinear J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - BB-EX 10 .1400 hrs .700 acres Runoff CN= 75
============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01867 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1333 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 1.68 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1332 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 1.68 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:BB-EX CN = 75 Area = .700 acres S = 3.3333 in 0.2S = .6667 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------2.4493 in .143 ac-ft HYG Volume... .143 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.12
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 100 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 7.5000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - BB-EX 100 Tc = .1400 hrs Drainage Area = .700 acres Runoff CN= 75 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01867 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1333 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 3.13 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1332 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 3.13 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:BB-EX CN = 75 Area = .700 acres S = 3.3333 in 0.2S = .6667 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------4.5929 in .268 ac-ft HYG Volume... .268 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.13
Name.... CC-EX Tag: 1 Event: 1 yr File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw Storm... TypeIII 24hr Tag: 1
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 1 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 2.8000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - CC-EX 1 Tc = .1600 hrs Drainage Area = 2.600 acres Runoff CN= 62 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .02133 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.2027 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .46 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.2082 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .46 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:CC-EX CN = 62 Area = 2.600 acres S = 6.1290 in 0.2S = 1.2258 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------.3217 in .070 ac-ft HYG Volume... .070 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
***** SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH PARAMETERS ***** Time Concentration, Tc = Computational Incr, Tm = .16000 hrs (ID: CC-EX) .02133 hrs = 0.20000 Tp
Page 3.14
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 10 Duration = Rain Dir = Rain File -ID = Unit Hyd Type = HYG Dir = HYG File - ID = Tc = Drainage Area = year storm 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 5.0000 in J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - TypeIII 24hr Default Curvilinear J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - CC-EX 10 .1600 hrs 2.600 acres Runoff CN= 62
============================================ Computational Time Increment = .02133 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1387 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 3.35 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1415 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 3.35 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:CC-EX CN = 62 Area = 2.600 acres S = 6.1290 in 0.2S = 1.2258 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------1.4384 in .312 ac-ft HYG Volume... .312 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.15
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 100 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 7.5000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - CC-EX 100 Tc = .1600 hrs Drainage Area = 2.600 acres Runoff CN= 62 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .02133 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1387 hrs Computed Peak Flow = 7.85 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1415 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = 7.84 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:CC-EX CN = 62 Area = 2.600 acres S = 6.1290 in 0.2S = 1.2258 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------3.1738 in .688 ac-ft HYG Volume... .688 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.16
Name.... SUBWATERSHED DD Tag: 1 Event: 1 yr File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw Storm... TypeIII 24hr Tag: 1
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 1 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 2.8000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - SUBWATERSHED DD 1 Tc = .1300 hrs Drainage Area = .050 acres Runoff CN= 64 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01733 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1507 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .01 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1498 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .01 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:SUBWATERSHED DD CN = 64 Area = .050 acres S = 5.6250 in 0.2S = 1.1250 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------.3843 in .002 ac-ft HYG Volume... .001 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
***** SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH PARAMETERS ***** Time Concentration, Tc = Computational Incr, Tm = .13000 hrs (ID: SUBWATERSHED DD) .01733 hrs = 0.20000 Tp
Unit Hyd. Shape Factor = 483.432 (37.46% under rising limb) K = 483.43/645.333, K = .7491 (also, K = 2/(1+(Tr/Tp)) Receding/Rising, Tr/Tp = 1.6698 (solved from K = .7491) Unit peak, Unit peak time Unit receding limb, Total unit time, qp Tp Tr Tb = = = = .44 .08667 .34667 .43333 cfs hrs hrs hrs
Page 3.17
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 10 Duration = Rain Dir = Rain File -ID = Unit Hyd Type = HYG Dir = HYG File - ID = Tc = Drainage Area = year storm 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 5.0000 in J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - TypeIII 24hr Default Curvilinear J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ - SUBWATERSHED DD 10 .1300 hrs .050 acres Runoff CN= 64
============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01733 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1333 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .08 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1332 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .08 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:SUBWATERSHED DD CN = 64 Area = .050 acres S = 5.6250 in 0.2S = 1.1250 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------1.5806 in .007 ac-ft HYG Volume... .007 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Page 3.18
SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD STORM EVENT: 100 year storm Duration = 24.0000 hrs Rain Depth = 7.5000 in Rain Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Rain File -ID = - TypeIII 24hr Unit Hyd Type = Default Curvilinear HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ HYG File - ID = - SUBWATERSHED DD 100 Tc = .1300 hrs Drainage Area = .050 acres Runoff CN= 64 ============================================ Computational Time Increment = .01733 hrs Computed Peak Time = 12.1333 hrs Computed Peak Flow = .17 cfs Time Increment for HYG File = .0083 hrs Peak Time, Interpolated Output = 12.1332 hrs Peak Flow, Interpolated Output = .17 cfs ============================================ DRAINAGE AREA ------------------ID:SUBWATERSHED DD CN = 64 Area = .050 acres S = 5.6250 in 0.2S = 1.1250 in Cumulative Runoff ------------------3.3867 in .014 ac-ft HYG Volume... .014 ac-ft (area under HYG curve)
Type.... Vol: Pipe Name.... UG DETENTION
Page 4.01
COMPUTED VOLUMES FOR A PIPE US Invert Elev.= DS Invert Elev.= Barrel Length = Computed Slope = Diameter = # of Barrels = Slice Width = Vertical Incr. = 140.00 140.00 325.00 .000000 6.0000 3.00 ft ft ft ft/ft ft
.10 ft .10 ft
Perpendicular Wetted Filled Perpendicular Total Elevation DS Depth DS Area Length Length US Depth US Area Volume (ft) (ft) (sq.ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sq.ft) (ac-ft) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------140.00 .00 .0000 325.00 .00 .00 .0000 .000 140.10 .10 .1028 325.00 .00 .10 .1028 .002 140.20 .20 .2892 325.00 .00 .20 .2892 .006 140.30 .30 .5285 325.00 .00 .30 .5285 .012 140.40 .40 .8095 325.00 .00 .40 .8095 .018 140.50 .50 1.1254 325.00 .00 .50 1.1254 .025 140.60 .60 1.4715 325.00 .00 .60 1.4715 .033 140.70 .70 1.8443 325.00 .00 .70 1.8443 .041 140.80 .80 2.2411 325.00 .00 .80 2.2411 .050 140.90 .90 2.6595 325.00 .00 .90 2.6595 .060 141.00 1.00 3.0975 325.00 .00 1.00 3.0975 .069 141.10 1.10 3.5534 325.00 .00 1.10 3.5534 .080 141.20 1.20 4.0256 325.00 .00 1.20 4.0256 .090 141.30 1.30 4.5130 325.00 .00 1.30 4.5130 .101 141.40 1.40 5.0140 325.00 .00 1.40 5.0140 .112 141.50 1.50 5.5277 325.00 .00 1.50 5.5277 .124 141.60 1.60 6.0529 325.00 .00 1.60 6.0529 .135 141.70 1.70 6.5886 325.00 .00 1.70 6.5886 .147 141.80 1.80 7.1341 325.00 .00 1.80 7.1341 .160 141.90 1.90 7.6882 325.00 .00 1.90 7.6882 .172 142.00 2.00 8.2502 325.00 .00 2.00 8.2502 .185 142.10 2.10 8.8193 325.00 .00 2.10 8.8193 .197 142.20 2.20 9.3947 325.00 .00 2.20 9.3947 .210 142.30 2.30 9.9756 325.00 .00 2.30 9.9756 .223 142.40 2.40 10.5613 325.00 .00 2.40 10.5613 .236 142.50 2.50 11.1511 325.00 .00 2.50 11.1511 .250 142.60 2.60 11.7443 325.00 .00 2.60 11.7443 .263 142.70 2.70 12.3402 325.00 .00 2.70 12.3402 .276 142.80 2.80 12.9381 325.00 .00 2.80 12.9381 .290 142.90 2.90 13.5372 325.00 .00 2.90 13.5372 .303 143.00 3.00 14.1372 325.00 .00 3.00 14.1372 .316 143.10 3.10 14.7371 325.00 .00 3.10 14.7371 .330 143.20 3.20 15.3363 325.00 .00 3.20 15.3363 .343 143.30 3.30 15.9342 325.00 .00 3.30 15.9342 .357 143.40 3.40 16.5300 325.00 .00 3.40 16.5300 .370 143.50 3.50 17.1232 325.00 .00 3.50 17.1232 .383
Type.... Vol: Pipe Name.... UG DETENTION
Page 4.02
Perpendicular Wetted Filled Perpendicular Total Elevation DS Depth DS Area Length Length US Depth US Area Volume (ft) (ft) (sq.ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sq.ft) (ac-ft) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------143.60 3.60 17.7131 325.00 .00 3.60 17.7131 .396 143.70 3.70 18.2987 325.00 .00 3.70 18.2987 .410 143.80 3.80 18.8797 325.00 .00 3.80 18.8797 .423 143.90 3.90 19.4550 325.00 .00 3.90 19.4550 .435 144.00 4.00 20.0241 325.00 .00 4.00 20.0241 .448 144.10 4.10 20.5862 325.00 .00 4.10 20.5862 .461 144.20 4.20 21.1403 325.00 .00 4.20 21.1403 .473 144.30 4.30 21.6857 325.00 .00 4.30 21.6857 .485 144.40 4.40 22.2214 325.00 .00 4.40 22.2214 .497 144.50 4.50 22.7467 325.00 .00 4.50 22.7467 .509 144.60 4.60 23.2604 325.00 .00 4.60 23.2604 .521 144.70 4.70 23.7614 325.00 .00 4.70 23.7614 .532 144.80 4.80 24.2487 325.00 .00 4.80 24.2487 .543 144.90 4.90 24.7209 325.00 .00 4.90 24.7209 .553 145.00 5.00 25.1769 325.00 .00 5.00 25.1769 .564 145.10 5.10 25.6149 325.00 .00 5.10 25.6149 .573 145.20 5.20 26.0332 325.00 .00 5.20 26.0332 .583 145.30 5.30 26.4300 325.00 .00 5.30 26.4300 .592 145.40 5.40 26.8028 325.00 .00 5.40 26.8028 .600 145.50 5.50 27.1489 325.00 .00 5.50 27.1489 .608 145.60 5.60 27.4648 325.00 .00 5.60 27.4648 .615 145.70 5.70 27.7458 325.00 .00 5.70 27.7458 .621 145.80 5.80 27.9852 325.00 .00 5.80 27.9852 .626 145.90 5.90 28.1716 325.00 .00 5.90 28.1716 .631 146.00 6.00 28.2743 325.00 325.00 6.00 28.2743 .633
Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... UG Detn Pipe OCS
Page 5.01
REQUESTED POND WS ELEVATIONS: Min. Elev.= Increment = Max. Elev.= 140.00 ft .01 ft 146.00 ft
********************************************** OUTLET CONNECTIVITY ********************************************** ---> Forward Flow Only (UpStream to DnStream) <--- Reverse Flow Only (DnStream to UpStream) <---> Forward and Reverse Both Allowed Structure No. -------------------Orifice-Circular O0 Orifice-Circular O1 Weir-Rectangular W0 TW SETUP, DS Channel Outfall ---------> TW ---> TW ---> TW E1, ft --------140.000 142.750 145.500 E2, ft --------146.000 146.000 146.000
Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... UG Detn Pipe OCS
Page 5.02
OUTLET STRUCTURE INPUT DATA
Structure ID = O0 Structure Type = Orifice-Circular -----------------------------------# of Openings = 1 Invert Elev. = 140.00 ft Diameter = .1250 ft Orifice Coeff. = .600
Structure ID = O1 Structure Type = Orifice-Circular -----------------------------------# of Openings = 2 Invert Elev. = 142.75 ft Diameter = .6667 ft Orifice Coeff. = .600
Structure ID = W0 Structure Type = Weir-Rectangular -----------------------------------# of Openings = 1 Crest Elev. = 145.50 ft Weir Length = 6.00 ft Weir Coeff. = 3.200000 Weir TW effects (Use adjustment equation)
Structure ID = TW Structure Type = TW SETUP, DS Channel -----------------------------------FREE OUTFALL CONDITIONS SPECIFIED CONVERGENCE TOLERANCES... Maximum Iterations= 200 Min. TW tolerance = .01 Max. TW tolerance = .01 Min. HW tolerance = .01 Max. HW tolerance = .01 Min. Q tolerance = .00 Max. Q tolerance = .00
ft ft ft ft cfs cfs
Type.... Detention Time
Page 6.01
Name.... UG DETENTION OUT Tag: 1 Event: 1 yr File.... J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\725.04 12-08-14 Redeveloped.ppw Storm... TypeIII 24hr Tag: 1
DETENTION TIMES SUMMARY HYG Dir = J:\725.04 Continuum Irvington\Engineering\PondPack\ Inflow HYG file = NONE STORED - UG DETENTION IN 1 Outflow HYG file = NONE STORED - UG DETENTION OUT 1 Pond Node Data = UG DETENTION Pond Volume Data = UG DETENTION Pond Outlet Data = UG Detn Pipe OCS No Infiltration APPROXIMATE DETENTION TIME --------------------------------------Qout+Infilt. Centroid = 37.8515 hrs Inflow Centroid = 13.8823 hrs Centroid to Centroid = 23.9692 hrs ---------------------------------------

Continuum Draft FEIS Oct 2012 - Appendix 4 Stormwater Management File - 73

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Continuum Draft FEIS Oct 2012 - Appendix 4 Stormwater Management File - 73

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

September 27, 2011 Revised September 24, 2012

THE CONTINUUM COMPANY IRVINGTON, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

PLOTTED BY: DIVNEY TUNG SCHWALBE, LLP

G:\CADD\725.04 TCC Irvington\725 SWM Figure - Site Location.fig

LEGEND DIRECTION OF STORMWATER FLOW (TYP)

SITE LOCATION MAP

91.09 94.24 96.10

153.58 155.15 155.77

99.05 96.36 97.65

103.28 106.75 143.34

111.71 111.67 112.18

EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

151.35 149.80 151.48 147.45

161.89 155.77 161.17 160.28 160.13 160.76

156.01 158.15 163.48 163.28

155.28 160.97 156.87 159.08 158.46

160.64 160.53 157.54

THE CONTINUUM COMPANY

Soil Symbol ChE SuB UhB

Hydrologic Soil Group B B B

Description Charlton Loam Sutton Loam Urban Land Charlton Complex

PLOTTED BY: DIVNEY TUNG SCHWALBE, LLP

G:\CADD\725.04 TCC Irvington\725 SWM Figure - Dev Conditions.fig

15" RCP I=89.3

155.77 153.44 154.25 161.17 160.28 160.13 160.76

14" Maple 12" Maple

DRAIN DRAIN INLET

155.28 160.97 156.87 159.08 158.46

DRAIN INLET DRAIN

154.25 153.67 153.58 154.51

CONC. VAULT T=95.7

CONC. VAULT T=96.7 6 T O G =9 . " R U H 10

99.05 96.36 97.65

DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

113 109 110

151.35 149.80 151.48 147.45

N OW OR FORM ERLY LA NDS OF I SLER

NC. I NGTON ESTATES, RVI LANDS OF I OR FORM ERLY

OR FORM ERLY LA NDS OF M cCONN

725 CLDRIVE 0.000000 100 5 1 NOGAP

THE CONTINUUM COMPANY

II. Water Quality Treatment Volume (WQv)

CONTINUUM IRVINGTON, NEW YORK

EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS Roof AREA Pavement IMP. TOTAL PERVIOUS

WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID TOTAL

4.78 1.18 4.11 0.22

0.23 0.07 0.18 0.06

725.04 Stormwater Analysis GP505105001.xlsx 8/17/2012

CONTINUUM IRVINGTON, NEW YORK

REDEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

AREA (AC) (1)

Tc (HRS) 86 96 81 75 62 64 0.21 0.08 0.23 0.14 0.16 0.13

725.04 Stormwater Analysis GP505105001.xlsx 8/17/2012

TABLE NO. 3 CONTINUUM IRVINGTON, NEW YORK

WQv (cf) 144 98 242

0.5 1.0 1.3

0.5 0.2 1.2

4. Porous Pavement: Reservoir: depth porosity

725.04 Stormwater Analysis GP505105001.xlsx 8/17/2012

Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP