Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Lewisville Atmos Energy Report

Lewisville Atmos Energy Report

Ratings: (0)|Views: 3,743|Likes:
Published by CBS11
Lewisville Atmos Energy Report
Lewisville Atmos Energy Report

More info:

Published by: CBS11 on Jan 23, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 Page 1 of 4Incident Number: 73188Status: SUBMITTEDCompany: ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIV.Street: 520 EAST MAIN STREET (LEONARDSTREET)City: LEWISVILLECounty: DENTONIncident Date: 01/11/2013Reference Number: 107188-2Report Type: OPERATORCompany Contact:
Texas Damage Reporting Form
Submitted to RRC on 01/22/2013
Incident #: 73188Reference #: 107188-2Incident Date: 01/11/2013County: DENTON
Who is submitting this information?
Stakeholder/Submitter:Name of person providing the information:Gas PipelineJulie Presley (Online)
P5 Operator Information
Operator P5 Number:Operator Full Name:Operator Address:Operator Address Line 2:City, State, Zip:Representative Name:Representative Phone:036589ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIV.P. O. Box 223705Dallas, TX 75222 3705Mr. Jeffrey S. Knights, Vice President, Technical Services(214) 206-2807
Excavator Contact Information
Excavator Company Name:Excavator Address:City, State, Zip:Excavator Contact Name:Excavator Contact Phone Number:Excavator Contact Fax Number:Excavator Email Address:TNMP1479 FM 407LEWISVILLE, TX 75077 2126ED FINLEY(972) 979-1453(972) 318-0138ED.FINLEY@TNMP.COM
Other Contact Information (General Contractor)
Company Name:Address:City, State, Zip:Contact Name:Contact Phone Number:Contact Fax Number:Email Address:Not Applicable
Excavation Information
Type of Excavator:Type of Excavation Equipment:Type of Work Performed:Depth of planned excavation?UtilityDrillingPole6 ft, 0 inches
Date and Location of Incident **
see RRC Note below 
)Date of Incident:State:County:City/Subdivision/Location Name:Street Address:Nearest Intersection:Latitude/LongitudeRight of way where incident occurred:01/11/2013Texas (USA)DENTONLewisville520 EAST MAIN STREETLEONARD STREET Dedicated Public Utility Easement
Affected Facility Information
Company name of affected facility:What type of facility operation was affected?What type of product was involved?What was the depth of the damaged facility?Was the facility part of a joint trench?Was the facility owner a member of One Call?ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIV.DistributionNatural or Other Gases5 ft, 9 inchesUnknownYes
Page2of4   TDRFFormRev.01-2011  
Texas Damage Reporting Form
Submitted to RRC on 01/22/2013
Incident #: 73188Reference #: 107188-2Incident Date: 01/11/2013County: DENTON
Notification, Locating, Marking
Was the One Call Center notified prior to excavation?YesName of One Call Notification Center?Texas Excavation Safety System, Inc.One Call ticket Number?1235209328Date of Notification:12/17/2012What was type of locator:Contract LocatorIf contracted, what was the name of the contracted locator?HEATH CONSULTANTSWere facility marks visible in the area of excavation?YesWere facilities marked correctly?YesIf not marked correctly, how far off in feet?Did excavator have to make a second call to the One-Call Center?NoWere marks made within 48 hrs of notification of intent to excavate?YesMethod Used to Locate:ConductiveIf other, explain method:Was paint a type of marking used?YesWere flags a type of marking used?YesWas there another type of marking used?NoIf yes, describe:Was site marked by "White Lining"?YesWere special instructions part of the locate order?UnknownWere maps used during marking?YesDid excavator give 48-hrs notice prior to excavating?YesDid the pipeline operator provide a positive response?YesDid locator meet with excavator at time of marking?NoWere pipeline company representatives on site at the time of excavation?NoDid the Operator follow their Damage Prevention/Locating Procedure?Yes
Excavator Downtime
Did the excavator incur down time?YesIf yes, how much down time?3 or more hours.Estimate cost of down time?unknown
Description of Damage
Was there damage to a pipeline?YesDid damage cause an interruption in service?YesIf yes, how much downtime? 1-2 days (24-48 hours)Approx. how many customers were affected?2-10Estimated cost of repair/restoration:unknownNumber of people injured:2-9Number fatalities:1Was the RRC called?YesRRC-assigned ID Number:762
Impact of Incident
Did ignition/fire occur?YesAdditional Public Impact:Evacuation occurred.Number of people evacuated: 10-19Media coverage occurred.Blocked streets/rerouting of traffic occurred.Explosion occurred.
Page3of4   TDRFFormRev.01-2011  

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->