-

Leiden
(International Court of Justice : ICJ)

()
(Chrugaruda)


(Ransiguta)


(Ketupany)

l

( )

( )
(Atikanishtha)

()
(Javnanda)

()

(Virasamriddhi)
l

(Tanganasinha)


(Chdatemiya)


(Kalasavibhta)


(Tulnanda)

l

( )
l

(Ubbhti)


() (Varnnkra)

()
(Holaputra)


(Chmaravarna)


(Alankranandana)


(Knchanashthiti)


(Kirtiputra)

l

(Mahsuvarna)

( )

( )

(Mahbandhana)

()
(Hemachandra)

(Setakasikara)

( )
(Rochanapurnanda)

()
(Tulyachint)

()
l

(Ratanodom)

l

( )


() (Chmaramn)

()

(Kalambasuta)

()

(Sandhinga)
l

()
(Hvnanda)

( )

(Chdavibhta)

()

(Sumanasukha)

( )

(Prijnnanda)

()

(Mitrnanda)

( )

()
(Suvansa)

l

( )
(Visynkra)

()
(Suddhisreni)

()

(Srichandrnanda)

( )

(Sankhanandana)

()
(Tishyamandala)

l

( )

( )

()

(Knchanajoti)

()
(Niyambh)
l

()
(Pradipavanija)

()
(Sarindu)

()
(Omnanda)

( )

()
(Dirghayasa)

()
(Punyanetra)

()
()
(Unhajta)

()
(Bhekanandana)

l

()
(Hemanga)

()
(Rasnanda)

()
(Pupphavesa)

()
(Sundararohita)

()
(Komalamena)

l

( )

( )

()
(Darbhalakshana)

()

(Poshyanandana)

()
(Amranandana)
l

()
(Prnatisha)

( )

(Punyadrabya)

l

(Makarnanda)


(Chunnnanda)


(Suddhasindhu)


(Sundarasuta)

( )
(Ratbharana)

l

(Indrabhakti)
()

(Javakula)

()
(Sarasinha)

( )

(Khamasundara)

()

(Gangachandra)

l

10

()

()
()

(Knchanagaja)

()
(Ambakasikara)

()
(Nilamba)

()
l

11

(Nityaprabh)

()
( )
(Gannkra)

()
(Sukhachitti)

()
(Bhvakalas)

()
(Rpavijetra)

()
(Anugrahnanda)


(Sankhamani)


(Sundarasara)

l

( )

( )

12

(Limpisuta)


()
(Knchanasuta)


(Punyodom)


(Thitatilaka)

()
()
(Satarat)

()
(Kosin)

()

(Vannasuta)
l

13

( )
(Pradip
na Tha - lang)
()

(Hutajta)
( )


(Abhichitta)


(Yvaves)


(Thitasra)


(Balamat)


(Saragupta)

l

(Chittanidhi)


(Bhekasuta)


(Chandrasrdla)
( )

(Vannabandhu)

l

( )

( )

()
(Thitalohita)
()

() (Milindnuja)
()

(Bhshitnanda)


(Dipapla)


(Subhasankha)

l

(Paurusha)


l

14

( )
4

15

( )
The System of the World

Constitutional Review*
. **

*
** , . . Majoring in Public Law [LLM.].

Certificate of English Proficiency [C.E.P.]. Ph.D.

16

(Hans Kelsen)
(supreme
norm)

Marbuy v. Madison
()
(Schewartz, a)
17

(Rosenfeld, )
Dr. Epstein ()
(Arnaiz, )


(decentralized system) (Sheive,
)
(American model)
(centralized system)
(Harutunyan, )
(European model)
.

(Ferejohn, )

18

(Stone,
)
(Arnaiz, )

(Louis, )

(Poulson, )

(Tate & Vallinder, )

(Guastini, )

(Arantes
19

& Nunes, )

(Epstein, Knight, & Shvetsova, )
(concrete review)

(Ludwikowski, )

(Shapiro & Stone, )

(Shapiro and Stone, )
(Vailinder, )




(Gaustini, ; Cardinal, )


20

(Guastini, )

(Rios-Figoueroa, )
(habeas
corpus)
(mandamus) (prohibition)

(certeriorari)
(quo-warranto)

()

()

21

()

()

()

(Shapiro and Stone, ; Mauro, )

Marbury V. Madison
..

(Murphy, Pricjett & Epstein, )

22

(Harutunyan,
a)

(Harutunyan, b)
.

(new democracies) (Schewartz,

b)

(Shapiro and Stone, )

(Sheive, ) (Henckaerts &
Jeught, )
23

(Harutunyan, ; Sheive, )


..
(Marmor, ) Grundnorm
(Patrono, )



(Epstein, Knight & Shvetsova, )

(Epstein,
)




(Guerra, )


(Harutunyan & Mavi, ; Malavet, ; Sheive, ;
24

Ludwikowski, ; Epstein, )

(supreme
norm)

(Harutunyan & Mavi,

; Ludwikowski, ; Epstein, Knight & Shvetsova,
)


(abstract norm control)
(concrete norm control)
(legal remedy)
(Guastini, )

(Patrono, )



(Mazk, ) (Harutunyan,
)

25

()

()

()

()

()
26

(Henderson, )



(Ferejohn, )



(Favoreau, )



(legal action)


(Lhmus, ; Adamovich, )

27

(Patrono, )



(Harutunyan, c)

(Harutunyan,
d)

(Harutunyan, e, f)

(Mavi, )

(Ahdieh, )
28

(Guanstini, )


(Harutunyan, )

(Patrono, )

(Epstein, )

29

30

(European model)

(decentralized system)

(priori
review)
(posteriori review)

(posteriori review)

(American model)

(abstract norm
c o n t r o l )

(concrete norm control)

(legal remedy)

(American model)

(centralized system)

(European model)

(concrete
review)

(Guastini, )

31

(Steinbergr, )

)
32

(Limbach, ; Malavet, )

(Patrono, )
)



(Sheive, )

)

(ex post facto)
33

(Cardinal, ;
Ludwidowski, )
)

(Guatini, )

(Malavet, )
)




(Guastini, )


34

)

(objective review) (subjective
review)

(Howard, )

(Rogoswski, & Gawron, 2002)

.

35

(Harutunyan,
)

.

(Skrmetti, )

(Henckaerts, & Stefaan, )

36

(Guerra, )
.
(constitutionalism)

(Albania) (Bulgaria)
(Croatia) (Lithuania) (Poland) (Romania)
(Russia) (Slovakia) (Slovenia)
(Czech Republic)


(Smith, ; Ludwikowski, )

37

(Giroto, )

.











38

(Girotto, )

(Guerra, )







(Le Monde, )

39

(Spitrovski, )

.








(Engel, a)

(Engel, b)

(Spirovski, )
40

(abstract dimension)





(Henckaerts & Stefaan, 1998)
.

41

..

.. (Patrono, )






(Howard, )

(Howard, )







(Wormuth, )




42

1 =
(constitutional review)
43

44

2 = (priori review)
3 = (posteriori review)
1 =

(abstract norm control)

2 =
(concrete norm control)
X1 =
(decentralized system)
X2 = (centralized system)
X3 = (draft)
X4 = (statute)
X5 = (regulation)
X6 = (specific)
X7 = (provision)
X8 =
(constitutional complaint)
Y1 =
(supremacy of constitution)
Y2 =
(Balance)
Y3 =
(constitutional problem)
Y4 =
(political structure)

Y5 =
(constitutional protection)
Y6 =
(legal remedy)
Y7 =
(private interest)
Y8 =
(public interest)

1 = 12 2 + 11 1 + 12 2 + 13 3 + 1 .....()
2 = 21 1 + 21 1 + 23 3 + 2 ......()

X1 =11 1 + 1 ......................()
X2 =21 1 + 2 ................()
X3 =32 2 + 3 ................()
X4 =42 2 + 4 .................()
X5 =52 2 + 5 ..........()
45

X6 =62 2 + 6
X7 =73 3 + 7
X8 =83 3 + 8

.......()
.......()
....()

1 =11 1 + 1
2 =21 1 + 2
3 =31 1 + 3
4 =41 1 + 4
5 =52 2 + 5
6 =62 2 + 6
7 =72 2 + 7
8 =82 2 + 8

.......()
..()
....()
..()
..()
..()
..()
..()

46

(Patrono, )

..

47

48

Adamovich, h.c. L. (2005). Federalism The role of the

constitutional court. Retrieved May 14, 2005. from http://

www.federalism2005.be/home/attachment/701
Ahdieh, R. B. (1997). Russias constitutional revolution legal

consciousness and the transition to democracy, 1985
1995. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University

Press.
Allen, B. C. (1989). Judicial review in comparative law. London:

Cambridge University Press.
Allen, H., & Baybrown P. S. (2002). Federal habeas corpus review.

Retrieved December 8, 2002, from http://profs.lp.findlaw.

com/habeas/habeas_11.html
Arnaz, A. S. (1998). Techniques of constitutional interpretation

by the European constitutional courts. Basque, Spain:

University of the Basque Country.
Cardinal, P. (2002). The judiciary and fundamental tights: A dual

Role, guarantor & breacher, lecturer at the MPI, 2002.

The Macau Legislative Assembly.
Engel, C. (2001a). Delineacting the proper scope of government

- A proper task for a constitutional court. Bornn:
49

Max-Planck Projektgruppe Recht der Germeinschaftsguter.
Engel, C. (2001b). The constitutional court - applying the

proportionality principle-subsidiary authority for the

assessment of political outcomes. Bornn: Max-Planck

Projektgruppe Recht der Germeinschaftsguter.
Epstein, L. (2005). The Comparative advantage. Washington DC:

Edward Mallinckrodt of Washington University, .
Epstein, L., Knight, J., & Shvetsova, O. (2001). The role of

constitutional court in the establishment and

maintenance of democracy systems of government.

Law and Society Review. 35(1), 117-167.
Favoreau, L. (1990). Constitutional review in Europe. Henkin, L.

& Roenthal, J. A (eds.). New York: Colombia University

Press.
Ferejohn, J. E. (2005). Constitutional review in the global context.

NY: The Hoover Institution: Stanford University.
Guastini, R. (2005). Implementing the rule of law. Retrieved June

22, 2005, from http://www. giuri.unige.it/intro/depist/digita/

felo/test/anlis-000/5.guastini.rtf
Guerra, L. L. (2002). The function of constitutional courts.

Washington, D.C.: Association of American Law Schools.

50

Guerra, L. L. (1994). The role and competence of the constitutional

courts in the role of constitutional court in the

consolidation of the rule of law - Proceedings of the

UniDem Seminar organized in Budapest on June 10, 1994.

Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.
Harutunyan, G. (2002a). Constitutional review in the new

democracies. Yerevan: Liubjana.
Harutunyan, G. (2002b). Priorities of selecting the forms and the

problems of formation of the objects and subjects of

constitutional review. Yerevan: Liubjana.
Harutunyan, G. (2002c). Basic approaches to perfecting the

system of constitutional review in the countries of

emerging democracy. Yerevan: Liubjana.
Harutunyan, G. (2002d). Models of constitutional / judicial review.

Yerevan: Liubjana.
Harutunyan, G. (2002e). Constitutional review in the development

of system rights protection. Yerevan: Liubjana.
Harutunyan, G. (2002f). Constitutional review in the field of

human rights protection. Yerevan: Liubjana
Harutunyan, G. (2005). Models of constitutional / judicial review.

Yerevan: Liubjana.

51

Harutunyan, G., & Mavi, A. (1999). Constitutional review and its

development in the model world. Yerevan: Liubjana.
Henderson, k. (2004). Global lessons learner: Constitutional

courts, judicial, Independence and the rule of law.

Washington DC: International Development.
Henckaerts, J. M., & Jeught, V. D. S. (1998). Human rights protection

under the new constitutions of Eastern Europe.

International and Comparative Law Journal. 10, 474 475.
Howard, A. E. D. (2001). Constitutions and constitutionalism in

Central and Eastern Europe (CSCEm ODIHR BULLETIN

Vol. 2 No.1). Virginia: University of Virginia.
Limbach, J. (2000). The role of the Federal Constitutional Court.

Germany Bundesverfassungsgericht. SMU Law Review,

53, 429-442.
Lhma, Uno. (2000). Decision of the constitutional review. Retrieve

October 5, 2005. 1- 5, from Chamber of the supreme

court from http://www.ne.ee/english/ const/1-8-001.html
Louis, F. (1990). American and European models of constitutional

justice. Berlin, German : Humboldt.
Ludwikowski, R. R. (1998). Mixed constitutions-product of an

East - Central European constitutional melting pot. Boston

University International Law Review, 16(1), 1 - 70.
52

Ludwikowski, R. R. (1996). Constitution-making in the region of

former Soviet dominance. Durham; Duke University Press.
Malavet, P. A. (1997). Comparative law: Introduction and type

of body. FL: University of Florida College of Law.
Marmor, A. (2002). The pure theory of law. Stanford, CA: Stanford

University.
Mauro, C. (1989). The judicial process in comparative

perspective. New York: Clarendon Press.
Mavi, A. (2004). Judicial review around the world. Paris, France:

Maison de Barreau.
Mazk, J. (2005). The Limits of constitutional review of ordinary

courts decisions in constitutional complaint proceeding:

CCS. 2005/11. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.
Murphy, W. F., Pricjett. C., H. & Epstein, L. (2001). Courts, judges,

& politics: An introduction to judicial process, The

constitutional adjudication mosaic of Latin America.

(5th., ed.) New Yok: New York University.
Patrono, M. (1999). The protection of fundamental rights by

constitutional courts: A comparative perspective.

Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
Poulson. W. B., (1984). The Constitutional crisis: An historical

perspective. Vol.34 No. 7. NY: A Publication of the
53

Foundation for Economic Education.
Rios-Figoueroa, J. (2005). The constitutional adjudication mosaic

of Latin America. New York: New York University Press.
Rogoswski, R. & Gawron, T. (2002). Constitutional courts in

comparison: The U.S. Supreme court and the German

federal constitutional court. New York: Berghaln Books.
Rosenfeld, M. (2002). Constitutional review. Washington DC:

Association of American Law Schools.
Schewartz, H. (1992a). A brief history of judicial review. In Andreas,

S., Larry, D., & Marc, P. (Eds.). Lynne Rienner: Boulder, Co.
Schewartz, H. (1992b). The new Eastern European constitutional

court. Michigan Journal of International Law. 13, 761-763.
Shapiro, M. & Stone, A. (1994). The new constitutional politics of

Europe comparative studies. Constitutional Review. 3(1).

397 - 420.
Sheive, S. W. (1995). Central and Eastern European constitutional

courts and the antimajoritarian objection to judicial review.

Law and Policy International Business, 26(4), 1201-1233.
Skrmetti, J. (1999). Does a written constitution necessarily require

a constitutional court: Comparative politics? Retrieved

February 3, 2007, from http://users.ox.ac.uk/~Hert11 335/

courts.htm
54

Smith, B. L. (1995). Constitutionalism in the new Russia.

Washington DC: Brookings.
Steinberger, H. (1994). Decision of the constitutional court and

their effects: The rule of the constitutional court in the

consolidation of the rule of law - Proceedings of the

UniDem Seminar organized in Budapest on June 10, 1994.

Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.
Stone, S. A. (2000). Governing with judge: Constitutional politics

in European. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tate, C. N., & Vallinder, T. [Ed.]. (1995). The global expansion

of judicial power. New York: New York University Press.
Vallinder, T. (1994). The judicialization of politics-4 world-wide.

International Political Science Review. 15, 91 99.
Wormuth, F. D. (2002). The origins of modern constitutionalism.

New York: Happer & Brothers Publishers.

55

56

(restorative justice)

57

58

59

.










60

,
61

( )

* , :
.

62

.





.



.

() / / .

63

.






.

(..), ,
, (: .. , ), .
, .

64

.




.




.

() / / .

65

(..)

....

.
. . .

.

(..), , ,
(: ,), - .
() / / .

66

.
()
()

.



,

, , (: , ), - .
(..), , .
(..), , (), ,
(: , ), .

67

() / / .

68

(..), (), .
( )

(...
//).
() / / - , () / / .

69

()
()
()
()
()
() -
()

()
()
() -





.

.

.

.

.

.
() / / - .

70

.

.


.

.

,
4...

() / / .

71

MBA
, ,

72

,.
(http://www.2bot.or.th/statistics)
..
,
,

(Source Country)

(Resident Country)

(International
Double Taxation)





73

(Exemption Method)
(Credit Method) (Deduction Method)
(Domestic Law)
(Double Taxation Agreement)

(Domestic Law)

74

.





75

. (Business Profit)

(Permanent Establishment)



(Independent Personal Services)


(Model Convention with Respect
to Taxes on Income and on Capital) OECD (Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development)

(Permanent Establishment)
(Fixed Base)

(Service)

OECD , Model Tax Convention on Income and On Capital (Condensed Version) 5th
edition , Paris : OECD Publications, 2010, p. 250.

76

.
. .
.

.
.

. (Independence
Personal Service Income)



( )
) (Fixed Base)

77

)




)




(Professional Services)



(Fixed Base)

(Permanent Establishment)

OECD

78

( )

( )

Philip Baker Q.C., Double Taxation Conventions, London : Sweet & Maxwell Ltd., 2007,
p. 14-2/1.
(
) ,

( ) , : , .
() , , .

79

(Fixed Base)

.

.
.

80

.
.

. (Dependent
Personal Services)

(
,
)

81

)

)

)

.

.

.

82

.
.

. , , ,
()

.
()

()

()

()

.

.

83

.

-
- )



( ) ( )

() , , .

84

(
./ )

(
./ )

.


.

85

.
.

. .

.

()

()

86

.
.

. (Capital Gains)
(Alienation of Property)
(Gains)

( )

()

() , , .

87

)


)

.




.
.

() , .

88

(Exemption Method) (Credit Method)

( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
89

. (Royalty)

()
(
)
.
.

( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
90

.



. (
)

( ) (

)
.
.

.


91

.



.

.
.

92

.




() .


()

. ()




()

()

()

93

()
.

.

( ) ..
( )

. ()

()

. , ,

94

..

.



()
( )
..
(

..
(Deduction Method)

95

( ) ..
( ) ..


.
A

A

.
(
) .. ( )
..



96

()

()

97

.)

()
(..)

()

()
(..)
.)
( )

98

,$ ,
,$ , ,$
()
(..)

.)


(Ordinary Credit Method)



()
(..)
.) (Deduction
Method)

.)
http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/

99

( ./
)











() ..
.)

.)

,
100

( )

..

. , . , . ,

101

102

.


(LAW IN BOOK) (LAW IN ACT)

.








(Subsumtion)
103

.


.

, : , . : ,
. .
, -.

104

.

(lato sensu)

(strict sensu)
(explanation)

, , , :
, . .
, .

105

(meaning) (significance)

(object)



.

, , -.
, , ,
,
, : , , .

106

(Juristic Method)

, .

107

, ,
, : , . .

108

() (Grammatical Interpretation)

() (Historical Interpretation)






() (Systematic
Interpretation)

, , -.

109

() (Teleological Interpretation)











110

ratio legis () ratio iuris (
)



(Historical Interpretation)

(ratio legis)

.






, , .

111

(stare decisis)

Statute

Precedent
112

induction
(reasoning by analogy)

ratio decidendi


Literal Interpretation




(absurd) (unjust)

(core meaning)

(penumbra meaning)


(ordinary meaning) (juridical meaning)


113

plain meaning rule

Sir Carleton Kemp Allen

)




)

, ,
, , : , , -.

114

()

115

.

.

, , : , . .

116

, , ,
, .

117

-

.. (

. /)

- .. (

. /)

- (..)

.. (

. /)

- .. (..)

.. (

. /)

-

.. ( . /)

-



.. (

. -/)







118

)







)



)




119

..










,

, ,
, , -.
, :
, , : , . .

120

, -.

121

()

..

(Source)
(Limitation)




. -.
, , .

122

, :
, , -.

123

.







(Constitutionalism)




..









, , .

124

..

..

125

..

126

..

, , :
, : , . -.

127

)




128

129

..

130

.











, , , : , . .

131

..












..



..
..

132

..











133

( )

(
) / (
./, ./)
-
( ./)
( - )
( - ) (
./)
( ./,
./)
( )
( )



(
. /, ./)
134

( K) ( ./)

(
./)

./















135

- / (
./,
./)

-
- ( ./)

- (
136

./)

-
( ./,
./)

.

..
(analogy)


(Gesetzesanalogie,
Einzelanalogie) (Rechtsanalogie,
Gesamtanalogie)

, , , .

137

. / ()
..


..

./

..












138

139

..
(argumentum a fortiori)



(argumentum a maiore ad minus)

(argumentum a minore ad maius)

./

..






(
)
, .

140

..

(argumentum e contrario, argumentum e silentio)


(analogy,
argumentum a simile)

..
(Teleologische Reduktion)


, .

141

( contra verba legis)

...


()




..


(source of law)

, .
, .

142

./

, .

143

- (
./ /, /,
/

- .
/, /, /,
/

- (
/

-
/

- (
/)

- (
/, /, /)










,
144