Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Letter to Hillary R. Clinton Aug 17, 2012

Letter to Hillary R. Clinton Aug 17, 2012

Ratings: (0)|Views: 3|Likes:
Published by Guy Shamir

More info:

Published by: Guy Shamir on Jan 29, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/29/2013

pdf

text

original

 
1Sharon S. Ben-Haim6-05 Saddle Rd. #225Fair Lawn, NJ 07410Tel: 917.775.5386 bringofirhome@gmail.com www.BringOfirHome.org August 17, 2012
Hon. Secretary of State - Hillary R. ClintonU.S. Department of State, 7th Floor2201 C. Street, NW, Washington, DC 20520-2818
Re:
Israel Violation of the U.S.-Israel Treaty of Friendship, Navigation and CommerceRequest to Invoke Article XXIV
Dear Ms.
Clinton
 
I am writing on behalf of American nationals who reside in Israel, who are being deprived of human rights, equal protection and basic justice. We ask you toinvoke Article XXIV (2) of the U.S.-Israel Treaty of Friendship, Navigation andCommence and submit a dispute on our behalf to the International Court of Justice. The Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, the Minister of JusticeYaakov Neeman and minister of Welfare should also be prosecuted individuallyfor committing crimes against humanity, and their own people.The Friendship Treaty guarantees Americans in Israel “most favorednation” protection equal to that of the most favored sector. The FriendshipTreaty’s mechanism for resolution of disputes is in The Hague. We therefore ask you to launch proceedings to take the Israeli nation to The Hague.In short, Israeli laws contain discriminatory preferences for women, whichresult in a butcher shop for men at family courts. American nationals aretechnically supposed to receive the same treatment as women, who are the mostfavored sector. In fact, the Americans suffer just the same as the Israeli men. As a
 
2result American citizen children are being disengaged from fathers for prolongeddurations, they lose their fathers or required to see them in security facilities“Contact Centers”, one hour a week. Oddly, most of the money to build theContact Centers in being donated from the United States via the JewishFederation, or IFCJ (International Fraternity of Jews and Christians). Fathers are being constantly arrested, persecuted, haunted by social workers who are trainedin male hate ideology, lose licenses, lose livelihood, and their properties are beingtaken away,
en masse.
 Many American men immigrate to Israel, and the Prime minister of Israel,Bibi Netanyahu, may send them to the wars of Israel to defend the country, andrisk their lives in combat. Later, they marry, and then divorce. At that point the biggest betrayal of Netanyahu of his own people comes. Suddenly these samemen, who were Israeli heroes and defenders of the State are abandoned, sent to the butcher shops of the family Courts, and slowly roasted until they either escape back to the United States, or commit suicide in Israel.In fact, the State of Israel, Netanyahu, Neeman and Kahlon, engage in asystematic practice of torture, violations of human rights and egregious gender discrimination for the intentional purpose of separating fathers from their natural born children in proceedings related to the dissolution of family relations.In order to perpetrate the assault and torture of men in divorce and childcustody proceedings, The State of Israel utilize a myriad of tools to suppress menand torture them, as follows:(a) The State of Israel protects, condones and encourages abductions of children from foreign countries to Israel by women, where women enjoy the presumption that the best interests of the child is equal to the best interest of theabducting mothers,(b) The State of Israel automatically disengages fathers from children either completely or by sending men to visitation centers, as a routine practice,(c) The State of Israel encourages women to file false domestic violencecomplaints against men and remove them from their homes, thereby preventingthe fathers from physically being in contact with their children.(d) The State of Israel’ policies operate to validate false domestic violencecomplaints, thereby giving women unfair advantages financially and in matters of custody,
 
3(e) The State of Israel’s policies operate to place greater evidentiary weighton the woman’s testimony and evidence in family courts and criminal Courts, (i.e.a woman’s testimony is always considered more credible than that of a man),(f) The State of Israel automatically and without Due Process grantsmotions against men, most times ex parte, or they aid and facilitate such practices,(g) The State of Israel imposes unconscionable child supports awards onmen regardless of the women’s income or the men’s actual income (sometimes at80% to 250% of the men’s actual salary) for the improper purpose of prejudicingthem, making them unable to meet court imposed obligations and coercing theminto giving up their parental rights, and their share of the marital property,(h) The State of Israel attributes to men fictitious “imputed salaries”without testimony or evidentiary support,(i) The State of Israel depletes men’s property and transfers it to their wives without testimony, evidentiary support or Due Process,(j) The State of Israel’ policies cause men to be arrested without due processfor inability to pay child support, be arrested on charges of “anticipatory refusal”to divorce, be arrested on false domestic violence charges, result in the revocationof men’s passports and driver’s licenses, and deny men the ability to work byissuing a constant stream of executions and levies.Even the rabbinical courts discriminate in favor of women. Rabbinicalcourts routinely support women’s claims in divorce, routinely award automaticcustody to women, routinely issue ex parte orders of arrest of men, even non-residents, based on spurious charges of “potential to refuse to divorce,” routinelyissue ex parte orders restraining men’s abilities to leave the State of Israel, androutinely transfer marital property to women or curtail the men’s right to equitabledistribution by allowing women exclusive possession until the children mature.In cases of abduction by women of minor children, because of the ancientreligious policy of preference for custody with women, The State of Israel and theRabbinical courts support and facilitate kidnapping by helping the womenkidnappers trap the fathers in Israel with excessive bonds, threats of arrest and ex parte orders. In the area of child abductions, The State of Israel consistentlyviolates the objectives of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of ChildAbduction by systematically denying left behind fathers their right to a speedyreturn of children abducted by mothers to Israel.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->