Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Why mergers fail?

Why mergers fail?

Ratings: (0)|Views: 8 |Likes:
Published by smh9662
Mergers and acquisitions - failures
Mergers and acquisitions - failures

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: smh9662 on Jan 30, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/09/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
Why Mergers Fail
Keywords: Mergers, Challenges, Abnormal Returns, Research and Development (R&D), andMarket Concentration
 
 2
Why Mergers Fail
July 2011ABSTRACTA number of empirical studies have shown that negative abnormal returns often resultshortly after a once promising merger is consummated. There are few consistent explanations,however, as to why so many mergers result in such poor performance. This paper sheds light onthis issue by examining the effect that structural factors (including market concentration andR&D intensity) have on post-merger abnormal returns. The paper also attempts to assess howdifferences in valuation among bidders, along with the presence of multiple bidders, influencethe performance of the merged firm. Our findings show that firm value is positively impacted inthe first one to three years post merger by acquiring related assets, but that participating in amerger wave in these years has a negative influence. Over longer periods of time these effectsare not evident and instead post-merger performance is impacted foremost by intangible assetintensity.
 
 1
Why Mergers Fail *I. Introduction
 There is considerable evidence that a large share of acquisitions made in the U.S. areunprofitable
ex post 
or that they lead to reorganization and/or divestitures of many of the mergedassets not long after the merger. Why does this pattern emerge? Why is it that the factors thatoriginally motivated the merger did not yield the anticipated value?To examine why many mergers have failed, it is useful to consider the motives behind theacquisition. Some of the most often cited potential benefits to mergers include operational,marketing, and financial synergies (including traditional scale economy rationales), gains inmarket share (and, hopefully, market power), and R&D improvements. This paper uses a multi-faceted approach to explore the determinants of merger outcomes, focusing on the key structuraland valuation factors that drove the companies to merge.To analyze merger success and failure, we analyze the abnormal returns to the mergedcompany, whereby company returns are compared over a period of time to a market capital-weighted index of comparable equities. Abnormal returns are calculated over one, three, andfive years and are adjusted for the market performance over the specified years. The sample of mergers used in this study is a group that was reviewed by the government for potential antitrustviolations, most of which were challenged (though eventually consummated) and all of 
*An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Industrial Organization Conference in Boston,April 2011. We thank John Kwoka for his helpful comments on that draft.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->