2.The facts and circumstances giving rise to these appeals are asunder:A.The legislature of Gujarat enacted the Gujarat Lokayukta Act1986 (hereinafter referred to as the, ‘Act, 1986’), which provided for the appointment of a Lokayukta, who must be a retired Judge of theHigh Court. The said statute, was given effect to, and variousLokayuktas were appointed over time, by following the procedure prescribed under the Act, 1986, for the said purpose, i.e., the Chief Minister of Gujarat, upon consultation with the Chief Justice of theGujarat High Court, and the Leader of Opposition in the House,would make a recommendation to the Governor, on the basis of which, the Governor would then issue requisite letters of appointment.B.The post of the Lokayukta became vacant on 24.11.2003, uponthe resignation of Justice S.M. Soni. The Chief Minister, after theexpiry of about three years, wrote a letter dated 1.8.2006 to the Chief Justice, suggesting the name of Justice K.R. Vyas for appointment tothe post of Lokayukta. The name of Justice K.R. Vyas was approved by the Chief Justice, vide letter dated 7.8.2006, and the Chief Minister, after completing other required formalities, forwarded thesaid name, to the Governor on 10.8.2006, seeking his approval, as
2