Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Border Patrol Survey 05

Border Patrol Survey 05

Ratings: (0)|Views: 83|Likes:

More info:

Published by: Judicial Watch, Inc. on Feb 01, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
This book can be read on up to 6 mobile devices.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/01/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
A Judicial Watch Special Report:U.S. Border Patrol Survey Analysis
 
Detailing the U.S. Government’s Polling of Apprehended Illegal Immigrantson the Southern Border in January 2004 Judicial Watch, Inc.
501 School Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20024Tel: 202-646-5172
Fax: 202-646-5199
 
 
Judicial Watch Special Report:
U.S. Border Patrol Survey Analysis
 
Introduction
This Judicial Watch Special Report analyzes a U.S. Border Patrol Survey of apprehended illegal immigrants conducted in January 2004. The surveys were obtained by Judicial Watch under the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
'
552, the Freedom of Information Act(“FOIA”), as part of the organization’s ongoing public education program. The subjectFOIA request, first filed on February 27, 2004, is being litigated in the U.S. District Courtfor the District of Columbia (
 Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security
, CivilAction No. 04-0907 (RBW)).Judicial Watch is a non-profit, non-partisan public interest group that investigatesand prosecutes government corruption. Judicial Watch was founded in 1994 with themission of promoting and restoring ethics and morality in the United States governmentand legal systems. As part of that mission Judicial Watch is a leader, with 600,000supporters, in fighting for transparency, integrity and accountability in government, lawand politics.Judicial Watch makes aggressive use of open records and open meetings laws as ameans to educate the American public on the operations of their government and to hold public officials accountable. We have filed well over 400 open records requests andsuccessfully litigated many of these requests in federal and state courts. Judicial Watchalso provides technical, research and litigation assistance to public interest groupsinterested in obtaining information about government activity who may not have thenecessary resources or experience to pursue information on their own as part of theJudicial Watch Open Records Project.Thomas FittonPresidentJudicial Watch, Inc.June 28, 2005
Questions or comments concerning this report should be directed to:Christopher J. FarrellDirector of Investigations & ResearchJudicial Watch, Inc.501 School St., SWWashington, DC 20024Tel: 202-646-5172Fax: 202-664-5199E-mail:cfarrell@judicialwatch.org
Page 1 of 16
 
Judicial Watch Special Report:
U.S. Border Patrol Survey Analysis
 
Executive Summary
President Bush’s “temporary guest worker” proposal of January 7, 2004 was broadly interpreted as an illegal immigration amnesty program around the country andabroad. The Bush administration ordered the U.S. Border Patrol to survey apprehendedillegal immigrants concerning President Bush’s proposal. The results indicated thatPresident Bush’s proposal had actually lured greater numbers of illegal immigrants toviolate the law. Politically inconvenient and/or potentially embarrassing data from theBorder Patrol survey resulted in the Bush administration calling off the survey on January27, 2004. The U.S. government never released a report based on the survey.The White House directed Homeland Security Public Affairs Officers todeliberately withhold information from the public and the media about the Border Patrolsurvey and a related spike in illegal immigration. The Bush administration misleadAmericans for political purposes. The White House approved talking points included:
 
Do not talk about amnesty, increase in apprehensions, or give comparisonsof past immigration reform proposals.
 
Do not provide statistics on apprehension spikes or past amnesty data.While the Border Patrol’s unscientific survey and its aborted execution may not provide a comprehensive picture of the relationship between President Bush’simmigration proposal and illegal immigration, the initial data is deeply disturbing.
 
Analysis of the raw data from the survey forms indicates:
 
45% crossed illegally based on rumors of a Bush administration amnesty.
 
63% received Mexican government or media information supporting thenotion of a Bush administration amnesty.
 
64% previously entered the United States illegally.
 
80% desired to apply for amnesty.
 
66% desired to petition for family members to join them in the U.S.A detailed summary of our findings and conclusions can be found starting at page15 of this report.Judicial Watch will continue to pursue this case and other illegal immigration matters,and report facts to the American people as part of its mission as a public interesteducational foundation.Page 2 of 16

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->