Contents
MESSAGE TO CONGRESSACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1PMA Goal: Improved Financial Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Financial Statement Audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Testimony on Financial Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Financial Integrity Investigations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
PMA Goal: Budget and Performance Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Compliance with IDEA Funding Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Migrant Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Continued Non-Compliance by High-Risk Pacific outlying areas Grantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Controls over Equipment in the Virgin Islands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Talent Search Program at Luther College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Fraud against Elementary and Secondary Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
PMA Goal: Expanded Electronic Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Critical Infrastructure Protection Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Network Intrusion (Hacking) Investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
PMA Goal: Elimination of Fraud and Error in Student Aid Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Fraud by Administrative and School Officials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Fraud by Student Aid Consultants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Fraud by Students. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Inconsistent and inaccurate Guidance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Improper Use of Reserve Funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Strengthening Accreditation Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Measuring Contractor Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Other Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Nonfederal Audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Reporting Requirements (P.L. 95-452) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Table 1:
Recommendations Described in Previous Semiannual Reports on Which CorrectiveAction Has Not Been Completed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 2:
ED/OIG Audit Services Reports on Education Department Programs and Activities(October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 3:
Other ED/OIG Reports on Education Department Programs and Activities(October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 4:
Inspector General Issued Audit Reports with Questioned Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 5:
Inspector General Issued Audit Reports with Recommendations for Better Use of Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 6:
Unresolved Reports Issued Prior to October 1, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 7:
Investigation Services Cumulative Actions (October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003) . . . 21
Table 8:
Statistical Profile: October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1
Activities and Accomplishments
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the period October 1, 2002 through March 31,2003, continued its work to improve the programs and operations of the Department of Education (Department) and to protect their integrity. We emphasized work to assist theDepartment in meeting the mandates of the President’s Management Agenda (PMA) and
Leave a Comment