Response to order to show cause12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Orly Taitz29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALiberi et al,Plaintiff,vs.Taitz et al,Defendant)))))))))ase o.: -Response to order to show cause byOrly Taitz, showing that she providedtruthful information during 01.14.2013hearing and request for leave of court tofile a Rule 11 motion against plaintiffsand their attorneys for fraud andfalsification of records from CA statecourt
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY ORLY TAITZ, SHOWINGTHAT SHE PROVIDED TRUTHFUL INFORMATION DURING 01.14.2013HEARING AND REQUEST BY TAITZ FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILEA MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS AND THEIRATTORNEYS FOR FRAUD AND FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS FROMCA SUPERIOR COURT
On October 22, 2012 Judge Guilford ordered the parties to "inform the Courtimmediately of any action taken on pending ethical, disciplinary or relatedmatters".
There were no pending ethical, disciplinary or related mattersregarding Orly Taitz.
The only pending matter is the appeal by Attorney Berg of the ruling of the Hearing Panel of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to suspend the law license of attorney Philip Berg for one year andone day, which would prevent him from being an attorney in the case at hand.On January 14, 2013 Attorney Berg told the court that on November 1, 2012 a judge sanctioned Taitz $4,000. Taitz stated that the award of $4,000 by JudgeMarginis was for
discovery, that it was indeed a cost shifting of attorneys feesrelated to discovery. J
udge Guilford stated in court on the record that indeed
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 593 Filed 02/04/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:15705