• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
The EU Communitarian Agenda and The NewFeudalists
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=180&Itemid=43
 By Philip Jones 26th October 2008"Communitarianism is a collectivist philosophy that explicitly rejects individualism. Itdoes not merely relegate individualism to a subordinate position, but is openly hostile toit. It is an ideology of 'civic society' which is nothing less than one version of Post-Marxist collectivism which wants privileges for certain wealthy and influential organizedgroups, and in consequence, a renewed feudalization of society." Vaclav Klaus.
Communitarianist Ideology
.The European Union is a major aspect of the `New World Order` and the so called`sustainable development` movement. The main objective of the Federal European Stateto be, is absolute social, personal and economic control in a collectivist and corporatistsociety. The philosophy behind the EU is a strange mixture of Capitalism andCommunism - a form of Euro Marxism which owes much of its dogma to the Pre WorldWar II Italian Marxist Philosopher, Antonio Gramsci.. The nearest ideology to thatpracticed by the EU is something called `Communitarianism`, or what Tony Blair calledthe 'Third Way'..We are talking of a dialectical trap here, with Corporate money funding Socialism asThesis, ideological Socialism as Antithesis and Communitarianism or the `newimperium` as Synthesis. Money grabs and concentrates power, whilst State Socialismpromises the total redistribution of ownership and wealth. This contradiction provides analmost irresistible dynamic.Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by asmall number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. Inorder to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.Can anyone deny that their goals are firmly on course.One of the most mysterious aspects of the European Union from a `lay-man’s` standpointis the decision making process. Even with only the bare minimum of research, it becomesclear that we the people have little or no influence on any of the decisions reached in our
 
name and the subsequent diktats which inevitably follow. In this article/essay, I will tryand identify the ideology and aims of the key socio- economic decisions that drive theEU, and how because of these decisions, our lives are increasingly no longer our own.The socio political economic agenda of the EU is carefully and intentionally buriedbeneath myriad layers of tedious and unintelligible `newspeak`. Despite this, in recentyears, as the pace of so called EU 'reform' has quickened, many researchers like myself have begun to expose and unravel this intentionally obtuse and often ambiguous jargonand reveal it for what it really is: A tool of confusion and misinformation intendedtowards the enslavement of the peoples of Europe by the rule of diktat and economicservitude..Once the spotlight of investigation is shone directly at `the beast`, what emerges is aCommunitarian Agenda driven solely by corporate interests. Monetary Profit is to be the`bottom line` on everything from public services to defence to the very usefulenvironmental `Trojan Horse`. High sounding `non descriptions` precede cleverly wordedspecifics that determine that the one and only benchmark be an economic one.The truth is of course that if the people of Europe themselves were to engage in settingthe EU agenda, the current programme would almost without question be reversed.Instead of the `Mammonistic` ideal of profit before all, we would most certainly witnessan agenda dominated by life quality issues like real un-politicised education for ourchildren, and a healthcare service not tied to the pharmaceutical conglomerates, and freeof political restraint, with a remit to provide the very best treatment available, whether itbe of the traditional or alternative varieties.
The Roots And Goals Of The New Feudalism.
Anarchists would probably say that the basis of the EU agenda rests squarely with theruling classes, but although in actuality correct, sooner than leave it at that, it is useful tounravel the `ball of string` by which the `Union’s` decisions are formulated, created ,morphed into diktat and then monitored. For what appears from beneath the shroud arethe most corrupting and powerful corporations in Europe. `Greed` entities with nopretence of any mandate beyond their combined annual turnover of €950 million and thefact they employ only around four million workers on a Continent inhabited by almost500 million people.Much of the ideological base for the EU Agenda can be found in the works of CountCount R. N. Courdenhove-Kalergi
 
 
Richard NicolausCoudenhove Kalergi1894-1972
 who is justifiably regarded by many as the `God-father` of the European Union. It was hissuggestion that Beethovens hymn be the EU's Anthem, and he was extremely active inconnection with the design of the EU logo. It was Coudenhove who founded the PanEuropean Union in the early part of the 20
th
century. It is interesting to note that hissuccessor in the movement was Otto Von Hapsburg, an honorary professor of theUniversity of Jerusalem, and recipient of the 'International Humanitarian Award', of the'Anti Defamation-League' (ADL) of the Jewish B’nai B’rith Masonery Lodge.Coudenhove Kalergi's father was a close friend of Theodor Herzle the founder of Zionism.Coudenhove’s vision for Europe was of a vast feudal fiefdom, where a small group of Money Aristocrats ruled a population of Serfs through a plutocratic {plutocratic = rule orpower through wealth} false democratism which we see today holds thrall over the wholeof the continent. His vision was shared, funded and sponsored by the `bloodline` andmoneyed families of both Europe (Rothschild’s) and the USA(Rockefellers). In fact,since the end of WWII, the major dynamic behind the Federalist vision has come notfrom the European side, but from the Eastern Seaboard `establishment` families such asthe Rockefellers, Harrimans, Morgan’s, Dulles’ and Bush’s.
Theatre For The Masses.
.
“The plan, I think, is the old one of world dominion in a new form . . . the money-power and revolutionary power have been set up and given sham but symbolic shapes('Capitalism" or "Communism') and sharply defined citadels ('America' or "Russia') . . .Such is the spectacle publicly staged for the masses. But what if similar men, with acommon aim, secretly rule in both camps and propose to achieve their ambition throughthe clash between those masses? I believe any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case.-- Douglas Reed 
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...