Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Letter to Prosser School District

Letter to Prosser School District

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,460|Likes:
Published by ncacensorship
Kids' Right to Read urges Prosser Schools to keep books despite objections from a Social Studies teacher who objects to their content.
Kids' Right to Read urges Prosser Schools to keep books despite objections from a Social Studies teacher who objects to their content.

More info:

Published by: ncacensorship on Feb 05, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 Dr. Ray Tolcacher, SuperintendentMaterials Reconsideration Committee MembersProsser School District1126 Meade Avenue, Suite AProsser, Washington 99350February 5, 2013Dear Dr. Tolcacher and Members of the Reconsideration Committee,We are writing in response to a recent challenge to the books
 A Child Called “It”
byDavid Pelzer (HCI) and
The Popularity Papers
by Amy Ignatow (Amulet Books). Weunderstand that the books are being reconsidered by a district committee after a teacherfiled a complaint about the contents of these books and their treatment of child abuse andnon-traditional families, respectively.It is our understanding that
 A Child Called “It”
is shelved in the Housel Middle Schoollibrary and can only be checked out by students with parental permission.
The PopularityPapers
on the other hand, is housed at two elementary schools in the district but is onlyavailable to fifth grade students. This means that students are not required to read eitherbook and restrictions are
already in place to implement parents’ decisions about allowing
their children to read the books. To further restrict or remove these books becausesomeone objects to their content would curtail the rights of students wishing to read thesebooks and of parents who allow access.The First Amendment precludes public officials from suppressing ideas simply becausesome people find them offensive or controversial. The Supreme Court has cautioned thatschool officials "may not remove books from library shelves simply because they dislike
the ideas contained in those books and seek by their removal to ‘prescribe what shall beorthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.’"
 Board of  Education v. Pico,
457 U.S. 853, 872 (1982)(plurality opinion). This constitutional dutyapplies with particular force in the school library, which, unlike the classroom, has "aspecial role...as a place where students may freely and voluntarily explore diversetopics."
Campbell v. St. Tammany Parish School Board 
, 64 F. 3d 184, 190 (5th Cir.1995).

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->