THE ORGANIZER
February 2009 • Issue #15.
Starbucks Workers Issue Management a Six Month Review
On a freezing but bright Minnesota morning, baristasgathered on the sidewalk in front of the Franklin andNicollet Starbucks in Minneapolis. Mittens clutched thesplintery handles of picket signs. The baristas started tochant, “Starbucks Union, here to stay; these lattes areunion made!”It was January 8th, 2009. Almost six months prior, inthe first public action of the IWW Starbucks WorkersUnion in Minnesota, baristasat the Mall of America Star-bucks had stopped work toprotest the closure of 600stores. A week earlier, one of the workers had been firedfor discussing unionizationwith his peers. Despite thefiring, the idea stuck, withbaristas at the Franklin andNicollet Starbucks soon joining their fellow workersat the Mall of America aspublic union members.Almost six months later, thegrowth of the union wasevident as workers fromseveral Minneapolis loca-tions came together to giveStarbucks a “Big Review.” Standing almost six feet tall,the “Review” was indeed “Big.” Aside from the tongue-in-cheek wordplay, the action had special meaning forStarbucks workers.
Normally, baristas wait for theirsix-month reviews nervously. If you have been suffi-ciently submissive, you may get a 30-cent raise. Mostpeople aren’t so lucky, getting 20 cents or less. Nowthings are different.
As a union, workers have the op-portunity to talk back.
Over the last two weeks, theTwin Cities Starbucks Workers Union gathered inputfrom baristas locally and acrossthe US through an online survey,scoring the company on a scale of 1-3 (the same as Starbucks ownreview system).The results were not flattering forthe bosses. Starbucks scored adismal 0.6, with baristas allegingillegal misconduct in many catego-ries, such as equal opportunityhiring, treating coffee farmers withrespect, paying decent wages, pro-viding consistent scheduling, andrespecting labor law.Indeed, two days earlier, the IWWStarbucks Workers Union filed 11charges encompassing 25 viola-tions of federal labor law with theNational Labor Relations Board.Union baristas alleged a pattern of abuses, ranging from interrogationof workers for suspected unionsympathies, to instructing supervi-sors to spy on the union, and dis-ciplining workers for participatingin the union. The charges are simi-lar to allegations broughtagainst Starbucks by IWWbaristas in New York City,where a federal rulingagainst Starbucks concludeda two-year legal battle be-tween the coffee giant andunion baristas.Since the legal process takestime, Twin Cities baristasdecided to take their mes-sage directly to management.After picketing for a fewminutes, the workers begantaking turns reading off alitany of grievances. “Povertywages.” “Inconsistent sched-uling.” “Racist hiring prac-tices.” “Union-busting.” “Un-fair disciplinary procedures.” “In-consistent scheduling.” Workerstold personal stories of sexualharassment by managers, bouncedrent checks, and the thousandother invisible miseries enduredby today’s working class.Heard on their own, the stories
continued on page 2Editorial
Editor Ericco Hedake onthe continued importanceof organizing, not politics,to combat worldwideeconomic recession.
Page 2Rebellion in Greece
An FW discusses therecent student and worker revolts in Greece.
Page 3Independent Un-ionism in Cambodia
An FW documents histrip to build solidarity between the IWW and Combodian labor unions.
Page 4Seattle Solidarity Network
An analysis of the SeattleSolidarity Network and the potential for broad-based organizationlocally.
Pages 5 & 6
Economic Crisis Action Group
Notes on the Twin Cities’ grassroots response tothe current implosion of capitalism.
Page 6
Add a Comment