3. JOY DAVIS SAID:
"Mr. Gillespie... essentially claimed me to be a false prophet and an anti-Christ"
WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID:
" Any teaching which teaches that Jesus, despite being God’s “only begotten Son”, is not "God" in nature *se
e Heb. 1:8; Is. 9:6], is not divine, and has no divinity whatsoever, is anti-Christ in spirit because it denies the Father being a real Father in the TRUE sense, and denies that Jesus is a real Son in the true sense!! ....That is heresy, the spirit of anti-
Christ, and by it the very teaching of God’s image in man is being obliterated."
TRUTH BE TOLD? I REFERRED TO HER
AS "ANTI-CHRIST IN SPIRIT" AND I NOWHERECALLED HER A "FALSE PROPHET". BUT HER
STANDS CONDEMNED IN MY BOOK; NOTHER AS A PERSON!! IT IS GOD'S ROLE TO JUDGE HER; NOT ME. I WONT SIT IN JUDGMENT ONHER AS SHE DOES ME AND MY
, BY ACCUSING ME OF BEING "DISHONEST", AN"ARCH DECEIVER", AND THE LIKE. I WILL ONLY JUDGE HER
BY THE WORD;
!! BIG DIFFERENCE!NOTICE HOW RESPECTFUL I WAS TO HER WHEN I SAID IN MY FIRST REVIEW OF HER WORK:
"I still defend the author’s right to freedom of conscience, and I also
protect her right to disseminate her views through this newly published book. But I amappealing to her to be careful she does not become the means by which the Archenemy or chief Anti-
Christ, the Devil himself, dishonors Jesus’ true nature
and rightful place of honor because of that nature, even as, ironically, she tries to protect thesupreme status of the Father of all. Balancing the truths of the Bible is a matter that should not be taken lightly, since all truths (like the commandments of God) are interconnected, and a denial of one is ultimately a denial of all. James 2:10-12."
IS THE ABOVE REFLECTIVE OF THE "MALICIOUSNESS" SHE ACCUSES ME OF? ONE WONDERS!!
GLARING CONTRADICTIONS IN JOY DAVIS' PART 2 "RESPONSE" TO MY PART 2 "REVIEW" OFHER BOOK:
If Mrs. Joy Penrose-Davis had thought that by her barrage of personal attacks against myperson that this approach would discourage me from constantly reviewing her thesis andcounterarguments, or I would let her off the hook for presenting error, I guess she has anotherthing coming.The more she endeavors to argue her way out of an already faulty thesis, is the more herarguments gets complicated and glaringly contradictory. She may think that hercounterarguments contain truth, but that is a shortsighted view which may only convinceherself, or the few Muslims here and there who are her main supporters its seems these days