• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Friday,March 24, 2006
Part II
Department of Education 
34 CFR Parts 75, 76 and 108Equal Access to Public School Facilitiesfor the Boy Scouts of America and Other Designated Youth Groups; Final Rule
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:37 Mar 23, 2006Jkt 208001PO 00000Frm 00001Fmt 4717Sfmt 4717E:\FR\FM\24MRR2.SGM24MRR2
  c  c   h  a  s  e  o  n   P   R   O   D   1   P   C   6   0  w   i   t   h   R   U   L   E   S   2
 
14994
Federal Register
/Vol. 71, No. 57/Friday, March 24, 2006/Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION34 CFR Parts 75, 76, and 108
RIN 1870–AA12
Equal Access to Public SchoolFacilities for the Boy Scouts ofAmerica and Other Designated YouthGroups
AGENCY
:
Office for Civil Rights,Department of Education.
ACTION
:
Final regulations.
SUMMARY
:
The Secretary adds a new partto title 34 of the Code of FederalRegulations and amends 34 CFR parts75 and 76 to implement the provisionsof the Boy Scouts of America EqualAccess Act (Act). This Act directs theSecretary of Education, through theOffice for Civil Rights (OCR), to ensurecompliance with this new law. Theregulations address equal access topublic school facilities by the BoyScouts of America and other designatedyouth groups.
DATES
:
These regulations are effectiveApril 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Sandra G. Battle, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,Room 6125, Potomac Center Plaza,Washington, DC 20202–1100.Telephone: (202) 245–6767.If you use a telecommunicationsdevice for the deaf (TDD), you may call1–877–521–2172.Individuals with disabilities mayobtain this document in an alternativeformat (e.g., Braille, large print,audiotape, or computer diskette) onrequest to the contact person listedunder
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
 
CONTACT
.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Theseregulations implement the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act, 20 U.S.C.7905. On January 8, 2002, the Presidentsigned into law the No Child LeftBehind Act of 2001 (NCLB), Pub. L.107–110, amending the Elementary andSecondary Education Act of 1965(ESEA). The Act is included in theseamendments to the ESEA and is foundin section 9525 of the ESEA. The Actapplies to any public elementary school,public secondary school, localeducational agency (LEA), or Stateeducational agency (SEA) that has adesignated open forum or limited publicforum and that receives funds madeavailable through the Department of Education (Department). Under the Act,these entities may not deny equal accessor a fair opportunity to meet to, ordiscriminate against, any groupofficially affiliated with the Boy Scoutsof America (Boy Scouts) or any otheryouth group listed in title 36 of theUnited States Code (as a patrioticsociety) (Title 36 youth group) thatwishes to conduct a meeting within thecovered entity’s designated open forumor limited public forum.The Act authorizes the Secretary toimplement this law by issuing andsecuring compliance with rules ororders with respect to the Act’srequirements through OCR. The Act alsodirects the Secretary, through OCR, toenforce this law in a manner consistentwith the procedure used under section602 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. If a covered public elementary school,public secondary school, LEA, or SEAdoes not comply with the Act orregulations issued by the Department, itwould be subject to the Department’senforcement actions.On October 19, 2004, the Secretarypublished a notice of proposedrulemaking (NPRM) for theseregulations in the
Federal Register
(69FR 61556). In the preamble to theNPRM, the Secretary discussed on pages61557 through 61559 the significantregulations proposed to implement theAct. These included the following:
Providing definitions for thefollowing statutory terms: ‘‘designatedopen forum,’’ ‘‘outside youth orcommunity group,’’ ‘‘to sponsor anygroup officially affiliated with the BoyScouts of America,’’ and ‘‘to sponsorany group officially affiliated with anyother youth group listed in title 36 of the United States Code (as a patrioticsociety).’’
Explaining that neither State norlocal law obviates or alleviates theobligation to comply with the Act andits implementing regulations.
Providing that the obligation of public elementary schools, publicsecondary schools, LEAs, and SEAs tocomply with the Act is not limited bythe nature or extent of their authority tomake decisions about the use of schoolfacilities.
Clarifying that equal access underthe Act includes not only access toschool facilities for meetings before,during, or after school, but also includesaccess to other activities related to anintention by any group officiallyaffiliated with the Boy Scouts or anyother Title 36 youth group to conduct ameeting within a covered entity’sdesignated open forum or limited publicforum. These other activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, meansof communication and recruitment.
Explaining that in order to be equal,the access provided to any groupofficially affiliated with the Boy Scoutsor any other Title 36 youth group must be on terms that are no less favorablethan the most favorable terms providedto one or more outside youth orcommunity groups.
Clarifying that public schools,LEAs, and SEAs can charge fees for thisaccess, but only on terms that are noless favorable than the most favorableterms provided to one or more outsideyouth or community groups.
Noting that the Act does not requireany school, agency, or school served byan agency to which the Act applies tosponsor any group officially affiliatedwith the Boy Scouts or any other Title36 youth group.
Incorporating the proceduralprovisions applicable to title VI of theCivil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI).
Amending 34 CFR 75.500 and76.500 to add the Act and theregulations in part 108 to the list of Federal statutes and regulations onnondiscrimination with which grantees,under 34 CFR 75.500, and States andsubgrantees, under 34 CFR 75.600, thatare covered entities must comply.The significant differences betweenthe NPRM and these final regulationsare as follows:
We have added definitions of ‘‘group officially affiliated with anyother Title 36 youth group,’’ ‘‘groupofficially affiliated with the BoyScouts,’’ ‘‘premises or facilities,’’ and‘‘Title 36 youth group’’ to §108.3.
We have added language to §108.5that a covered entity may require thatany group seeking equal access underthe Act inform the covered entitywhether the group is officially affiliatedwith the Boy Scouts or with any otherTitle 36 youth group. We have alsoadded language that a covered entity’sfailure to request this information is nota defense to a covered entity’snoncompliance with the Act or itsimplementing regulations.
We have restructured and modified§108.6 so that the section more clearlyexplains the circumstances and termsunder which access is required by theAct and its implementing regulations.
We have added language to §108.6regarding nondiscrimination under theAct and its implementing regulations.
We have deleted some language inproposed §108.8, renumbered thissection as §108.9, and added a new§108.8 addressing assurances of compliance.
We have added language to §108.9to address the scope of fundtermination.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Secretary’sinvitation in the NPRM, over 3,000parties submitted comments on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:37 Mar 23, 2006Jkt 208001PO 00000Frm 00002Fmt 4701Sfmt 4700E:\FR\FM\24MRR2.SGM24MRR2
  c  c   h  a  s  e  o  n   P   R   O   D   1   P   C   6   0  w   i   t   h   R   U   L   E   S   2
 
14995
Federal Register
/Vol. 71, No. 57/Friday, March 24, 2006/Rules and Regulations
proposed regulations. An analysis of thecomments and of the changes in theregulations since publication of theNPRM follows.We discuss major substantive issuesunder the sections of the regulations towhich they pertain. Generally, we donot discuss comments that simplysupport the regulations, and we do notaddress technical and other minorchanges
or suggested changes the lawdoes not authorize the Secretary tomake.
Section 108.3Definitions
a. Designated Open Forum
Comments:
One commenter expressedthe concern that, under the definition, apublic school would be required toallow the Boy Scouts, but not otheryouth or community groups, to meet onschool premises during the school dayif the school allowed a single outsideyouth or community group to meet onschool premises or in school facilitiesduring school hours, such as the RedCross for a school blood drive. Thecommenter stated the definition wouldcreate a far greater right of access duringthe school day for the Boy Scouts andcertain other groups, based on theirviewpoint, than would be available toother youth or community groups.Another commenter believed thedefinition would be a valuable tool ininterpreting the Act because thedefinition made clear that if a schoolallows outside groups to use schoolfacilities at any time, even during schoolhours, it may not prevent the BoyScouts from using the facilities on thesame terms.One commenter stated the definitionshould include literature distribution byyouth groups, such as the disseminationof recruitment materials, even if nomeeting occurs with representatives of those groups, believing that this would be consistent with the requirement of proposed
§
108.6(b) pertaining to equalaccess to means of communication.
Discussion:
The definition of 
designated open forum
is consistentwith the Act
s definition of limitedpublic forum, which states that alimited public forum exists wheneverthe school involved grants anopportunity for one or more outsideyouth or community groups to meet onschool premises or in school facilities before or after school. The definition in
§
108.3 of a designated open forumretains the statutory focus on accessprovided to one or more outside youthor community groups for meetings, andclarifies that, in the context of the Act,such a forum exists whenever the schoolinvolved designates a time and place forone or more outside youth orcommunity groups to meet on schoolpremises or in school facilities,including during the school day, forreasons other than to provide theschool
s educational program.Under this definition, a school retainscontrol over its educational programand does not create a designated openforum simply by inviting an outsidegroup to the school to presentinformation to the students. Forinstance, if a school, as part of itscharacter education program, invites anoutside group to speak to the student body on saying no to drugs, that doesnot mean that the school has created adesignated open forum and must allowany group officially affiliated with theBoy Scouts or with any other Title 36youth group to come to the school toconduct a presentation related tocharacter education or to conductmeetings with students during schoolhours. Similarly, if the parent teacherassociation (PTA) of a particular schoolis an outside group not affiliated withthe school, and the school, as part of itseducational program, invites the PTA tospeak to students about careeropportunities, that does not mean thatthe school has created a designatedopen forum and must allow any groupofficially affiliated with the Boy Scoutsor with any other Title 36 youth groupto come to the school to conduct apresentation related to careeropportunities or conduct meetings withstudents during school hours. In both of these examples, the schools have notcreated designated open forums, andtherefore the Act does not apply.The language pertaining to equalaccess, in section (b)(1) of the Act(section 9525(b)(1) of the ESEA, asamended by NCLB), makes clear that theprotections of the Act are triggered by arequest to hold a meeting within acovered entity
s designated open forumor limited public forum by any groupofficially affiliated with the Boy Scoutsor with any other Title 36 youth group.Therefore, a designated open forum orlimited public forum must be a forum inwhich groups can meet. A forumconsisting solely of literaturedistribution does not satisfy thisrequirement and, thus, cannot be adesignated open forum.The proposed definition fordesignated open forum included thephrase
‘‘
the school
s educational benefits or services,
’’
which is not asprecise as the phrase
‘‘
the school
seducational program.
’’
 
Changes:
We have revised thelanguage in the definition of designatedopen forum to incorporate the phrase
‘‘
the school
s educational program.
’’
  b. Group Officially Affiliated With AnyOther Title 36 Youth Group; GroupOfficially Affiliated With the Boy Scouts
Comments:
Two commenters statedthat the regulations could be interpretedto mean that any groups officiallyaffiliated with the Boy Scouts, includingchurches, synagogues, and nonprofitorganizations, could use schoolfacilities, and have access to otherschool-related means of communicationand student information, for purposesthat have nothing to do with the BoyScouts or other Title 36 youth groups.
Discussion:
The Act provides equalaccess to school premises or facilitiesfor any group officially affiliated withthe Boy Scouts or with any other Title36 youth group. The focus is equalaccess for the Boy Scouts or other Title36 youth groups, rather than equalaccess, for any reason, for anyorganization or group that has anyofficial affiliation with the Boy Scoutsor with a Title 36 youth group. Thus,the Act does not provide equal access toan organization that sponsors a BoyScout troop, but rather provides equalaccess to the Boy Scout troop sponsored by that organization. The Act covers theyouth groups that are formed as a resultof the community organizationchartering process for the Boy Scouts orsimilar chartering or other process forother Title 36 youth groups.
Changes:
We have provideddefinitions for
group officially affiliated with any other Title 36 youth group
in
§
108.3(g) and
group officially affiliated with the Boy Scouts
in
§
108.3(h).c. Limited Public Forum
Comments:
A commenter stated thatthe definition of 
limited public forum
should include literature distribution byyouth groups, such as the disseminationof recruitment materials, even if nomeeting occurs with representatives of those groups, believing that thisaddition would be consistent with therequirement in proposed
§
108.6(b)pertaining to equal access to means of communication.
Discussion:
The statute defines whena limited public forum exists, and thedefinition in
§
108.3 for limited publicforum simply incorporates that statutorydefinition.
Changes:
None.d. Outside Youth or Community Group
Comments:
One commenter arguedthat the definition of 
outside youth or community group
creates a loophole, inthat an LEA could claim that particularyouth groups are affiliated with the LEAand are, thus, entitled to access, such asrecruiting access, denied to the Boy
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:37 Mar 23, 2006Jkt 208001PO 00000Frm 00003Fmt 4701Sfmt 4700E:\FR\FM\24MRR2.SGM24MRR2
  c  c   h  a  s  e  o  n   P   R   O   D   1   P   C   6   0  w   i   t   h   R   U   L   E   S   2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...