:

1
2
3
4
5

2
6
17
21
27


40
-60 . 2543

-60

.. 2535

900


2,500

2545

(.)
(.)
.. 2504 ..2508

.. 2503
(Atoms for Peace)

1
..2505


..2518
TRIGA Mark III
General Atomics 2
.. 2532
(.)
(International Atomic Energy Agency : IAEA)

14 8
27 2532
...
..."1 .

.. 2534 (.)
316
. 27
2532
( ) .




.
.
1 ..2536

. (Lump Sum Turnkey)

3

.. 2535
.
3.5
..2536


1 .. 2536

7 .. 2536
. Electrowatt Engineering (EWE)
247
.
.. 2537
6 6

..253839 (GA)

2
GA
10 GA GA

5/1 2
.. 2539
. ( )
4
3
GA

27 .. 40
26 .. 40
6 .. 40

15 .. 40

17 .. 40
18 .. 41

GA
1 4
. 605 ( 2,750
3,355 )
. (GA)
3,355,574,465 48
. (.)
(EIA) 3.15
6
. (
)
( Non Turnkey) 13
.

.
() 828

2535
10 (.. 2535-2544) 2
1) 10

3,355 ( 2540
4,500 )
2544
2) 1 18
()
828 2544

7,298
5

2535-40
2541
2542

654,998,500
742,801,700
1,667,847,400

2543-2544

4,233,194,000
7,298,841,600

6
1)

2)
( )

3)

( 2545)
(1.) 18
2544
(2.) 26
2544

(Preliminary Safty Analysis Report : PSAR)

(3.)
(4.) GA 20 7
900
(5.) . GA 900
GA 3 .

170 8
(6.) . 2,500

2536

TOR, ,
.


1.
1.1







3 1)
2) 3)




( ensuring that the
safety of the reactor shall be reviewed and evaluated by the regulatory body in venders country9)

(
)

.
(GA) GA

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US-NRC)

GA

10
.
GA . GA
. GA
900

. 6
MINUTES OF ORIENTATION MEETING, February 4-11, 1994
The reactor
building design shall be licensable in bidders country of origin if needed.
(shall be licensable)
ensuring that
the safety of the reactor shall be reviewed and evaluated by the regulatory body in venders country
(reviewed and evaluated)

TOR

the reactor proposed is of a type that has been reviewed by the regulatory body of bidders
country if any or both of these conditions are not fulfilled, the Bidder must
base his Bid on a longer review period

.
GA
GA

 GA

GA AECL Siemens
GA
5 GA

GA
GA

1.2
2539 6
General Atomics (GA)

2
GA 5/1
1 2539
.
GA 11
- GA

- GA Guarantee

- GA
. GA

- GA US-NRC

.
4
GA 1
GA . GA

1)

2)

3)

2.

GA GA
GA

basic design12
.

GA
13
- GA TOR 20.5
- GA 2-6

- GA

- GA
GA
10

- GA
- 4

.
() . GA
26 2540 .

GA

 .
2540
.
( ) .
( )

3. GA
.
GA

GA

GA
2
3.1 subcontractor
GA 5
10 GA
sub contractor Raytheon
Raytheon

.
GA prime contractor GA
GA
sub contract 50 GA 30 %
10
11

Raytheon
Raytheon GA
ATT ( sub contract ) ATT

GA ATT Raytheon
. GA

 .( ) GA
GA Raytheon
.
GA GA
14

GA GA
GA
GA ANSTO ( subcontractor
) subcontractor (
) GA


turnkey GA
TRIGA 10 GA

GA
15
. GA .

3.2
GA
2


() .. 2009


GA
2541 . GA
Enriched Uranium ()
. Enriched Uranium
. GA 362,000
.
23 2541 .16


. GA
.( )
.




-60 .

.

GA 3
GA
.. 2538 GA
GA17
( . )
GA
GA GA
GA

. .
GA

.

18

2



.

 .
GA GA
. GA GA


4.

GA
. .19

4.1

..2535


45

45


GA GA
GA
.


20
4.2
GA
Guarantee 2-6
Guarantee

 60 ./. 20 ./.
60 ./.
GA
4.3

5
5


GA
5
4.4
TOR 1 B-29 13


TOR 3 1 3 (Lisensing)

( 3
) GA
US-NRC
.
7 21
GA


2

(GA)
GA



(.)

3
27 .. 42

(Oak
Ridge National Laboratory : ORNL)
US-NRC
28 .. 43
. (Argonne National Laboratory
: ANL)

11 .. 43
.

19 .. 43



44

.

25 .. 44
GA .
. .

24 .. 44

16 .. 44


.
.

.
. (
)


22

30 2543


23 .


24
27 2542

3
7
3
3

16 2542 .

28 2543 .

13 2543
. 3 11
2543

2541
. 16

 3



1)

2)
( )

3)

.
27
2532


.

.
.. 2504-2518
21 2535
...()
.



...
...
5-10




5-10

5-10

.

25
. 2541

.


- ...
. .

.
26
.


27
.


.
1.
.
. 5
-60 450,000 3

""
-137 "" -60
10

2.


.
.

" "




20

 .
feasibility study





30 200



Boron-Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) . .

BNCT GA BNCT
GA 200,000 BNCT


BNCT

.
200,000 BNCT

.
.
" 3


"28

.

.

()

.. 2540
2541

1.
2
800
.
.


.

2.
.
15 .

2542

2 .

3. .

. .
60

GA .



.
20-30

300

4.




.

-


29
5.
2

31 .

30

* ()
1
.

25-30
2
.

25-30
3
. .

40
1,200
4
. (27)

55-60
350
5
. (419)

55-60
984
6
. (14)

55-60
1,202
7
.

155
2,300
8

125
400
9
.139

139
1,000
.
10
.

285
50,000
11
.

80
7,800
12
.

30
300
13
. (27)

60
350
14
.

60
15
.

110
928
16
.

90
17
.

60
246
18
.

60
282
19
.

60
286
20
.

60
315

.
.

.
.
.
.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

.
. .
(.)
. .
. .
.

. .

.139

.
30
. . .

31
. 1 .

. . (31)
* . ()

60
50
55
35
30
110
130

400
1,000
9,035
290
260
>3,000

35
125

290
1,000

.
.

54
63

578
483

.
.

31
2



.
.
31
.
1.
2.
40
3.

4.

5.

. .

32 (IAEA)

(EIA)

(.)
EIA
.


33 .(.) EIA
2540 6
EIA
- EIA 3 (.)
EIA
-

.
-

- EIA 2540 ..
2544 EIA

. 100%
100%

Greenpeace International
(ANSTO) 10
2

ANSTO




10,000 131
80 .
10 .

-60
-60 2543


-60




34




10

1.

 40

()


2.

10
5

7,298 ( 2541)
2,500
GA 900 4,000

170 GA 900
1,070 8,368
( 2,500 5,868 )

1) 4,000
2)
3)

4)

27 2532

. 1 2539

3
4

GA
26 2539
5
., 18 2541
6
, ,
, 2541
7
. 8 2544
8

9
,
,
10
1/2540 12
2540
11

. 1 2539
12
3(16-20 2539) .
27 2539
13
GA
26 2539
14
.
12 2542
15

16
. 9
1998
17
GA
26 2539
18
82/2542
. 1 2542
19

.
12 2542

20

, 15 2540
21
22
23

. 13 2543
. 30 2543

24

. 13 2543
25
., 21 2535
26
., 10 2541
27

., 11 2541
28
" 2000" 1 .. 2541 .
29
( 2) 11
2541
( 4-10)
30

, ,
, 2541
31

Comments from the review of the PSAR (Revision E) for the 10 MW ONRC TRIGA
reactor, IAEA, November 2000

3 Site Characteristics
2543
32

22 2541

33
. 0804/9809 18 .. 2537
34
0202/07 7 2543
-60 .