• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
The original doc. at http://freeassemblage.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-world-order-may-be-islamicist.html contains hyperlinks to references.Tuesday, February 17, 2009New World Order May Be Islamicist >If there is a "new world order," it isn't what we though it was twenty yearsago.<It amazes me how people often know so little about the world in which they live.That is not to say that what I think I know about it is always correct. I'velearned sometimes that I was wrong.But when someone, even someone young, asks this sort of question, it terrifies meto think that it is the reason we have headed so far down the paths of nationalismand socialism. Someone asked:"Did American (USA) society just come to be or was its creation...a conspiracy(but either good or bad- i don't know what word to use). What I'm trying to askis, was it planned? Who's trying to control us!? Some kind of secret order?"We all wonder about "control." We hear stories, about how J. Edgar Hoover had the"dirt" on everyone who was someone and used it to control them. We all have heardabout the New World Order and if we believe in it, each of us has our theory ofwhat it means and who's behind it. First we thought it was Ronald Reagan, but evenBill Clinton was caught up in it according to some accounts.If there is a "new world order," it isn't what we though it was twenty years ago.It now seems as if this new order is western governments caving in to MuslimSharia. It isn't the Islam in this order that scares me; it's the Sharia.Britain has been caving for years, its courts allowing limited Sharia to operatein the UK. There is a least one member of the House of the Lords who is not onlyMuslim, (again, no problem so far as I care,) but he is also an Islamicist, and ifBritania isn't careful, it will fall like Lebanon, except there won't be any warto accomplish it. Britain will go quietly into the night, and it is alreadyturning off the lights on its own heritage dating from before the Magna Charta,heritage that finds freedom for the people where it was only the light at the endof the tunnel.Now it has tunnel-vision, and the light of Western freedom is retreating.But the answer to the opening question goes something like this:The truth? No one is trying to control us but the politicians, and what they do istransparent enough if you read the laws they pass.You were born with individualsovereignty, said the founders."Individual sovereignty was not a peculiar conceit of Thomas Jefferson: It was the
 
common assumption of the day; " http://www.friesian.com/ellis.htmAnother word for this type of sovereignty is "unalienable rights." THAT was the"conspiracy" that constructed our way of life. Unfortunately, the Founders didn'tsee the future coming, and left so many holes in the Constitution that it isbasically worthless today.But you can get back some of your sovereignty by supporting your states in theireffort to force to the Fed govt to respect the 10th Amendment. The Tenth AmendmentNewly AscendingIt won't be easy to regain your personal, individual, unalienable sovereignty, butit can be done because the 10th Amendment does exist, and it cannot be ignored--except by efforts such as the Patriot Act that declare the safety of the nation tobe more important than its own laws which protect its own citizens.In Britain, it may be harder. There is no hard, written Constitution exceptprecedent, which, under the right leadership, may be able to pull England out ofthe clutches of the clerics who are Islamicists. Lord Ahmed is a repugnantindividual in association, character and morality who has threatened jihad on theHouse of Lords. "The Pakistani Press is jubliant, and [ ] is praising Allah fordelivering ‘a victory for the Muslim community’." Creeping Jihad at Harvard & VA;Your Town Next?But don't think Sharia isn't coming to a U.S. location near you soon. MuzzammilHassan, founder of Bridges TV, is charged with murder in the beheading of hiswife, Aasiya Hassan in Orchard Park, New York.http://www.buffalonews.com/437/story/578644.html"A cautionary tale is unfolding in the Netherlands this week about how dangerousthose can be: proving that such tools in the hands of the powerful enable them tosilence the powerless and crush dissent, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal orderedthat Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch Parliament and maker of the notoriousfilm "Fitna", be prosecuted for 'incitement to hatred and discrimination based onhis statements in various media about moslims [sic] and their belief. In addition,the Court of Appeal considers criminal prosecution obvious for the insult ofIslamic worshippers because of the comparisons made by Wilders of the Islam [sic]with the nazism.'"The action against Wilders is taking place against the backdrop of the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference’s efforts at the United Nationsto silence speech that they deem critical of Islam -- including 'defamation ofIslam' that goes under the 'pretext' of 'freedom of expression, counter terrorismor national security.'"If they succeed in doing this, Europeans and Americans will be rendered mute, andthus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Shariaon the West -- in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis, non-Muslims subjugated under Islamic rule, is that they are never critical of Islam,Muhammad, or the Qur’an. Thus this initiative not only aids the advance of Sharia
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...