Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant

First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant

Ratings: (0)|Views: 44 |Likes:
Published by Bill Stewart

This is a must read for every American, and provides information concealed from the American people and not taught in the schools, yet it is a famous court case. Mortgage Foreclosure case where the bank lost the case. The yellow highlighted text does not appear on the Scribd viewer, but it is still there and the yellow highlighted text will all display after you download the document and reopen it from your hard disk. This is a famous case, commonly referred to as the Credit River case, that both factually and legally established how the Federal Reserve Banking System creates money from nothing, and creates credit from nothing, but at the same time the Federal Researve Banks and the National Banks charge customers money for loans and mortgages that the banks actually paid nothing to make, legally called no valuable consideration given by the bank. A bank cannot foreclose nor can it repossess property if the agreement was based in fraud. All bank agreements are based in fraud. The bank president admitted to the fraud and still expected to be able to foreclose on the defendant's property, but the judge in the case would not allow it, and wrote a very descriptive and educating opinion regarding why what the banks do is completely illegal and fraudulent. The case also established that the Federal Reserve Banks and the national banks are one and the same, due to all the interlocking agreements. This case documents that the Constitution is the highest law of the land, that there is no provision for what the banks do in the Constitution, that Federal Reserve Notes are not lawful money, and are no longer even promises to pay, because they now only say Note, and not Promissory Note. This case proves that there is no fiscal cliff, that the fiscal cliff is another scam of the government and the Federal Reserve Banks to raise taxes and enslave us, with illegal techniques not allowed by the Constitution. The first 19 pages are the court decisions, and the next 21 pages are laws that the decisions are based on.

This is a must read for every American, and provides information concealed from the American people and not taught in the schools, yet it is a famous court case. Mortgage Foreclosure case where the bank lost the case. The yellow highlighted text does not appear on the Scribd viewer, but it is still there and the yellow highlighted text will all display after you download the document and reopen it from your hard disk. This is a famous case, commonly referred to as the Credit River case, that both factually and legally established how the Federal Reserve Banking System creates money from nothing, and creates credit from nothing, but at the same time the Federal Researve Banks and the National Banks charge customers money for loans and mortgages that the banks actually paid nothing to make, legally called no valuable consideration given by the bank. A bank cannot foreclose nor can it repossess property if the agreement was based in fraud. All bank agreements are based in fraud. The bank president admitted to the fraud and still expected to be able to foreclose on the defendant's property, but the judge in the case would not allow it, and wrote a very descriptive and educating opinion regarding why what the banks do is completely illegal and fraudulent. The case also established that the Federal Reserve Banks and the national banks are one and the same, due to all the interlocking agreements. This case documents that the Constitution is the highest law of the land, that there is no provision for what the banks do in the Constitution, that Federal Reserve Notes are not lawful money, and are no longer even promises to pay, because they now only say Note, and not Promissory Note. This case proves that there is no fiscal cliff, that the fiscal cliff is another scam of the government and the Federal Reserve Banks to raise taxes and enslave us, with illegal techniques not allowed by the Constitution. The first 19 pages are the court decisions, and the next 21 pages are laws that the decisions are based on.

More info:

Published by: Bill Stewart on Feb 20, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/17/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Page -1-
STATE OF MINNESOTAIN JUSTICE COURTCOUNTY OF SCOTTTOWNSHIP OF CREDIT RIVEMARTIN V. MAHONEY, JUSTICEFirst National Bank of Montgomery,Plaintiff,FINDINGS OF FACTCONCLUSIONS OF LAW  Jerome Daly,ANDDefendant.JUDGMENTThe above-entitled action came on before the Court on January 22; 1969 at 7:00 P. M.,pursuant to Motion and Notice of Motion and Order to Show Cause, a true and correct copy of  which is attached hereto as page 13 “A.” An action for the recovery of the possession of Real Property was brought before this Court for trial on December 7, 1968, at 10:00 A. M., by Jury. A true and correct copy of the Judgment and Decree entered by this Court on December 9, 1968 is attached hereto as pages 14 thru 17.On January 6, 1969 this Court filed a Notice of Refusal to Allow Appeal' with the Clerk of theDistrict Court, Hugo L. Hentges, for the County of Scott and State of Minnesota, which is attachedhereto as pages 18, 19, & 20.Minnesota Statutes Annotated 532.38 required that the Appellant, First National Bank of Montgomery, deposit with the Clerk of the District Court within ten (10) days, two ($2.00) Dollars(lawful money of the United States) for payment to the Justice of the Peace before whom thecause was tried. This is one of the conditions for the allowance of an appeal.Two One ($1.00) Dollar Federal Reserve Notes were deposited with the Clerk of the District Court. One was issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,, bearing Serial No.
 
Page -2-
L12782836 and the other on deposit was issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolisbearing serial number I80410697A. A specimen, for illustrative purposes, is as follows:This Court determined that said Notes on their face were contrary to Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution. of the United States and also, based upon the evidence deduced at the hearingon December 7, 1968, the Notes were without any lawful consideration and therefore were void;however, this Court indicated it would give the Plaintiff, First National Bank of Montgomery, afull and complete hearing with reference to this issue.No hearing was requested and this Court was order to show cause before the District Court as to why the Appeal should not be allowed.Therefore, this Court ordered a hearing before this Court on January 22, 1969 for the purposeof making findings in fact and conclusions of law.Pursuant thereto, the above-entitle action came on for hearing before this Court on January 22, 1969 at 7:00 P. M. The First. National Bank of Montgomery made no appearance although
 
Page -3-
service of the Motion and Order was served, upon Ralph Hendrickson, its Cashier, on January 20,1969. No continuance was requested by Plaintiff or its Attorney.The Defendant appeared by and on behalf of himself. After waiting for one hour for the Bank or its representative to appear the'Court recieved thetestimony of Defendant.Now, Therefore, based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein and the evidenceoffered this Court makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Judgment andDetermination with reference to the allowance of an appeal:FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, JUDGMENT AND DETERMINATION1.That the Federal Reserve Banking Corporation is a United States Corporation with twelve(12) banks throughout, the United States, including New York, Minneapolis and San Francisco.That, the First National Bank of Montgomery is also a United States Corporation, incorporatedand existing under the laws of the United States and is a member of the Federal Reserve System,and more specifically, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.2.That because of the interlocking activities, transactions and practices, the Federal ReserveBanks and the National Banks are for all practical purposes, in the law, one and the same bank.3.As is evidenced from the book "The Federal Reserve System, Its Purposes and Functions:”put out by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D. C., 1963, andfrom other evidence adduced herein, the said Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks createmoney and credit upon their books and exercise the ultimate prerogative of expanding andreducing the supply of money or credit in the United States. To illustrate the admission of theiractivity, pages 74 through 78 are attached hereto as Pages 21, 22 & 23.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->