Mathematics Olympiad Coachs Seminar, Zhuhai, China
3
For any positive integern,
f(1)− f(0) = f(1)− f(1/2) + f(1/2)− f(0)
≥f(1/2) −f(0) + 2 + f(1/2) −f(0)
= 2[f (1/2)−f (0)] + 2
= 2[f (1/2)−f (1/4) +f (1/4)−f (0)] + 2
≥2[f (1/4) −f(0) + 1 + f(1/4) −f(0)] + 2
= 4[f (1/4)−f (0)] + 4 =··· ≥ 2n[f (1/2n)−f (0)] + 2n.
Similarly,f (−1)−f (0)≥ 2n[f (−1/2n)−f (0)] + 2n. But
f(1/2n )+ f(−1/2n )≥ 2f(0) + 1/2n−2 >2f(0).
Thus, for eachn, at least one off (1/2n)−f (0) andf (−1/2n)−f (0) is greater than 0. It follows
that at least one off (1)−f (0) andf (−1)−f (0) is greater than 2n for alln≥ 1, which is impossible.
Hence there is no very convex functions.
4. Leta1 ,a2 ,...,an (n > 3) be real numbers such that
a1+ a2+··· + an≥ n
and
a21+ a22+··· + a2n≥ n2.
Prove that max(a1 ,a2 ,...,an)≥ 2.
Solution:
Letbi = 2−ai, and letS =
biand T=
b2i. Then the given conditions are
that
(2−a1) +··· + (2−an)≥n
and
(4− 4b1 +b21) +··· + (4− 4bn +b2n)≥n2,
which is to sayS≤ n andT≥ n2− 4n + 4S.
From these inequalities, we obtain
T≥ n2−4n+4S≥(n−4)S+4S= nS.
On the other hand, ifbi > 0 fori = 1,...,n, then certainlybi <
bi= S≤ n, and so
T= b21+··· + b2n < nb1+··· + nbn= nS.
Thus we cannot havebi > 0 fori = 1,...,n, sobi≤ 0 for somei, andai≥ 2 for thati, proving the
claim.
Note:The statement is false whenn≤ 3. The examplea1 =a2 =··· =an−1 = 2,an = 2−n
shows that the bound cannot be improved. An alternate approach is to show that ifai≤ 2 and
ai≥ n, then
a2i≤ n2(with the equality case just mentioned), by noticing that replacing a pair
ai ,ajwith 2,ai+ aj−2 increases the sum of squares.
5. Let{an}n≥0 be a sequence of real numbers such thatan+1≥ a2n +15 for alln≥ 0. Prove that
√an+5≥ a2n−5for all n≥5.
Add a Comment