16 1.2. Arena ideologic\u0103 a postmodernismului..................................................... 21 1.3. Este Eco un postmodernist ?.............. ..................... .................... ............
2.1. Conturarea unei arhive a procedeelor postmoderniste............................ 50 2.2. Demitizarea demitiz\u0103rii............................................ .................... ............ 54 2.3. Neobarocul\u015fi neomanierismul................................................ ................. 59 2.4. Eroicomicul burlesc postmodernist....... .................... ................. .............. 68 2.5. Impresia de deja-lu..... .............................................................. ................ 77 2.6. Democra\u0163ia electronic\u0103.....................................\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 85 2.7. Versiunile personajului postmodernist\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026.. 91
3.1. Poetica deschiderii\u015fi lectorul-model........................................ ............... 104 3.2. Tehnica focaliz\u0103rii interne....................................................... ................. 110 3.3. Ironia in rebus....................... .................... ................. ................. ............. 120 3.4. Teoria lumilor posibile............................................................ ................. 133 3.5. Poetica lui Joyce\u015fi poetica lui Eco.......................... .................... ............ 142
CONCLUZII................. ................................................ .................... ............153 REFERIN\u0162E BIBLIOGRAFICE\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026.\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026.. 165 BIBLIOGRAFIE SELECTIV\u0102\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026... 174 ADNOTARE (\u00een limbile rom\u00e2n\u0103, englez\u0103 \u015fi rus\u0103)\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026..
\u201eUmberto Eco\u015fi retorica romanului postmodernist\u201d, - iat\u0103 o tem\u0103 \u00een care coexist\u0103 dou\u0103 probleme \u00een egal\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103 controversate\u015fi neclare, pe care reac\u0163ia variatelor categorii de arti\u015fti contemporani\u015fi unii teoreticieni, le despic\u0103 aproape f\u0103r\u0103 ezit\u0103ri \u00een doi poli, oblig\u00e2ndu-i s\u0103 se a\u015feze, iremediabil\u015fi ostil, spate \u00een spate. Pe de o parte, personalitatea viguroas\u0103 \u015fi polivalent\u0103 a lui Umberto Eco, semioticianul\u015fi scriitorul italian, considerat a fi unul dintre \u201cmon\u015ftrii sacri\u201d ai literaturii de azi. Monstru, pentru c\u0103 erudi\u0163ia sa o dep\u0103\u015fe\u015fte pe a celor mai mul\u0163i cercet\u0103tori din trecut
precedent. Detractori pasiona\u0163i (Philip Renard, Alfredo Giuliani, Joseph Rosenblum, Hugh Lindley\u015f.a.)\u015fi nu mai pu\u0163in pasiona\u0163i ap\u0103r\u0103tori (Teresa De Lauretis, Burkhart Kroeber, Rocco Capozzi, Renato Giovannoli\u015f.a.), \u00eempart scena semiotico-literar\u0103 italian\u0103 \u00een dou\u0103 frac\u0163iuni: una anti-echian\u0103\u015fi una filo-echian\u0103.
Pe de alt\u0103 parte, nu mai pu\u0163in dilematic\u0103 este\u015fi problema postmodernismului. Lipsa unei explica\u0163ii clare a termenului, precum\u015fi cea a unei opinii satisf\u0103c\u0103toare asupra fenomenului artistico-literar \u00een general, a condus la excese nelimitat pozitive din partea unor critici\u015fi teoreticieni, \u00een timp ce repudierea adversarilor a mers p\u00e2n\u0103 la demolarea complet\u0103 a fundamentelor postmodernismului.
Pentru toate aceste motive, studiul exigent al poeticii individuale a lui Umberto Eco\u015fi al altor scrieri postmoderniste, a\u015fa de diferite \u00een substan\u0163a\u015fi finalitatea lor practic\u0103, apare de o stringent\u0103 actualitate. \u00cen ceea ce prive\u015fte \u201eretorica\u201d postmodernismului, termenul ni s-a p\u0103rut cel mai potrivit, gra\u0163ie elasticit\u0103\u0163ii sale, pentru a desemna \u00eentreg setul de probleme enun\u0163at anterior. Vom sub\u00e2n\u0163elege a\u015fadar, prin retoric\u0103, studiul normelor\u015fi al procedeelor de crea\u0163ie caracteristice postmodernismului, lu\u00e2nd \u00een calcul deci deplasarea spre sensul actual acordat poeticii, dar\u015fi discursul declamator, afectat\u015fi emfatic ce argumenteaz\u0103 fie mersul triumfal al postmodernismului, fie funeraliile sale.
| Category: | Uncategorized. |
| Rating: | |
| Upload Date: | 02/23/2009 |
| Copyright: | Attribution Non-commercial |
| Tags: |
A social science magazine from Medias published by Cr3ativ
A social science magazine from Medias published by Cr3ativ
A social science magazine from Medias published by Cr3ativ
2 carti: Imaginatia simbolica si Imaginarul
Leave a Comment