road which led them their defeat to the British. The conqueror had become the conquered, so tospeak.The Burmese conquest resulted in a complete destruction of the country and suffering of its people. High handedness of the Burmese became so unbearable that a large-scale rebellion brokeout in 1794 with the backing of the Rakhaings settled across the border. It was a trial of determination rather than a physical contest. The Burmese mounted their troops in greater numbers. Unequalled in strength the uprising collapsed. In fear of their lives waves of Rakhaings poured into the British territory. The Burmese forces chased the Rakhaings into the British sideof the border and remained there encamped until three Rakhaing resistance leaders were handedover to them by the British authorities who were misled by the Burmese contrivance; and noresponsible British officials would have dwelt without a sense of guilt upon their cooperationwith the Burmese. Four years later another sizable revolt sparked up and once again by theabsolute majority of man power the upheaval was quelled and exodus of refugees ensued. Thecondition of the refugees was extremely serious. Dire need of food and shelter was compoundedwith the outbreak of disease in epidemic proportion. The magnitude of the problem was such thatthe British authorities organized relief measures in 1799. Consequently a dispute boiled up over the escaping Rakhaings. The Burmese who did not take kindly the desperate plight of therefugees demanded expulsion of the all Rakhaings from the British territory, now estimated fiftythousands. In the subsequent discussion of the issue, notwithstanding the threat of war by theBurmese viceroy, the British refused to cape in to the Burmese proposition and pressed on the point that the frontier was being well guarded that it had been before and the Rakhaings were notallowed to cross the border one direction or the other. The Burmese finally dropped their demand. The British stood firm by their position because partly they were sympathetic to theRakhaings, and in part they anticipated that the Rakhaings might conspire to discomfit and helpdefeat the Burmese, yet their decision to uphold the British prestige should not be ruled out.Upon each collapse followed by extortion of exorbitant taxes. The drastic action which wasmeant to stamp out rebellion adversely strengthened the will of the surviving Rakhaings toexecute the very thing the Burmese intended to prevent it from happening.A seemingly impossible event, serious in nature, took place in 1911. An ingenious leader, knownas Chun Byan, nom de guerre, diligently assembled thousands of men to his banner in the Britishterritory. The phalanx of improvised militia sustained by the spirit of motherland and armed withwhatever weapons they could lay hands on crossed the border unimpaired. They boldly marchedto Mrohaung and captured it in brief and brilliant campaign. With the prestige of commendablevictory behind Chun Byan wasted no time to communicate with the British authorities in Bengalin an effort to seek recognition and help, and offered to become a British protectorate. TheBritish did not accede to the request. Apparently the government of Chun Byan was agovernment within a government, which though a formidable force was no match for theBurmese who were bound to prevail. Compliance with the request would entail a militaryconfrontation with the Burmese which the British were not prepared to commit at the momentwhen the east India Compamy was engaged in a with the Marathas in India, and England withthe French under Napoleon. The British decided that their interest would be better served by notrushing to the aid of the Rakhaings. They would prefer to dissipate the strength of the Burmesethrough a third party, the Rakhaings who were accordingly wooed by deals and favours. Inexchange for their allegiance the expatriate Rakhaing nobility and gentry were dispensed withfiefdoms of land which stretched from Ramu to the Naaf River.
Leave a Comment