• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
White Paper
The Truth AboutInteractive Whiteboards,Pens and Fingers
Separating Myths from Facts
 
 
This white paper is for informational purposes only, is subject to changewithout notice and should not be construed as offering any future productcommitments on the part of SMART Technologies ULC. While significanteffort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information, SMARTTechnologies ULC assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors,omissions or inaccuracies contained herein. © 2007 SMART Technologies ULC. All rights reserved. SMART Boardand the SMART logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of SMARTTechnologies ULC in the U.S. and/or other countries. All other third-partyproduct and company names may be the trademarks of their respectiveowners.
1
 
The Truth About Interactive Whiteboards,Pens and Fingers 
 
Introduction
We encounter touch technology virtually every day, whenever we use aninteractive kiosk, a PDA, a touch-sensitive gaming device or a bankmachine. Touch technology frees us from dependence on keyboards andmakes it quick and easy to interact with digital content. All touch systemsuse technology that tracks contact with a display surface and transmitsthat information to a computer.Touch technology for interactive whiteboards can be divided into twobroad categories:
pen-and-finger systems 
and
pen-only systems.
Pen-and-finger systems register input from virtually anything – the mostcommon devices being a user’s finger or a nonproprietary pen tool. Pen-only touch systems require a special device to register contact with theboard’s surface, usually a proprietary pen.Each technology offers different advantages, depending on the user’sneeds, but because interactive whiteboards are a relatively newinformation and communication technology (ICT), information aboutvarious options and features abounds. Evaluating and sorting throughvolumes of technical information necessitates being able to quicklyseparate myth from fact.This white paper is an attempt to dispel some of the myths about the twodifferent kinds of interactive whiteboard systems. It explains the nature ofthese myths and the facts they mask, and concludes that the mostimportant differences between pen-only and pen-and-finger systemsrelate to basic versus premium feature sets and personal preference.
The Myths
Myth #1: The need for hand support – a question ofusability
One frequently heard myth concerns the need to rest one’s hand on thesurface of the board while writing. Pen-and-finger systems can detectcontact from virtually any object, so they will read a hand resting on theboard’s surface as an attempted pen or mouse event. With pen-onlysystems, all communication occurs between the special pen tool and theboard’s surface, so resting hands do not register contact.Pen-only advocates suggest that being able to rest one’s hand on theboard means users can write more naturally. However, writing on a large,vertical surface is not the same as writing on a small, horizontal orangled surface, such as on a PDA or Tablet PC. When writing on smalldevices, we use fine motor movements in our fingers and wrist. On
2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...