• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
Superior Court of WashingtonCounty of KING, Regional Justice Center (AUK)
In re the
RESPONSE(Marriage Cause No 08-3-08617-1):SAKHI
, Mohammad John and Jane Doe & MaritalCommunity Thereof.DOB: 06-03-1966 (John) DOB: 07-23-1979 (Jane)
Joined-Petitioner(s)LYNNE-SAKHI [SAKHI]
, Rachel and John Doe &Marital Community Thereof.
Respondent(s)No.
 
08-3-08617-1Response to Petition(Marriage)(RSP)Declaration of Modification of PetitionMarital CommunityDeclaration of Name ChangeRachel LYNNE-SAKHICheck box if petition is attached for:[X] FULL ORDER FOR PROTECTIONDV (Attached)(PTORPRT)To the Above-Named Petitioner:I. Response1.1Admissions and Denials
The allegations of the petition in this matter are
 Admitted 
or 
 Denied 
as follows (check only one for each paragraph):Paragraph of the Petition
Response to Petition (RSP) WPF DR 01.0300 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.09.0300 
 
1.1[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.2[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.3[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.4[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information 
Reason for Denial:
 
Don’t fix what’s NOT BROKEN
.1.5[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.6 [ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information 
Reason for Separation:WE WERE HOWEVER, LEGALLY HARASSED, STALKED,INTIMIDATED, BRIBED, THREATENED.
1.7[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.8[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.9[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.10[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.11[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.12[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.13[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.14[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.15[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks Information1.16[ ]Admitted[
X
]Denied[ ]Lacks InformationEach allegation of the petition that is denied, is denied for the following reasons (List separately):
1.1 Insufficiently Defended1.2 Insufficiently Defended1.3 Insufficiently Defended1.4 Insufficiently Defended1.5 Insufficiently Defended1.6 Insufficiently Defended
Response to Petition (RSP) WPF DR 01.0300 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.09.0300 
 
1.7 Insufficiently Defended1.8 Insufficiently Defended1.9 Insufficiently Defended1.10 Insufficiently Defended1.11 Insufficiently Defended1.12 Insufficiently Defended1.13 Insufficiently Defended1.14 Insufficiently Defended1.15 Insufficiently Defended1.16 Insufficiently Defended1.2Notice of Further Proceedings
 Notice of all further proceedings in this matter should be sent to the address below:
PO BOX 1790, SEATTLE, WA 981111.3Other (Notices & Notifications)
 
Notification of Settlement pending modification of Petition for Dissolution.
 The Basis for Modification and settlement pending modification of Petition for Dissolution is as follows:I.My husband has hired a Defender who is charging him $300.00 per day.
Response to Petition (RSP) WPF DR 01.0300 Mandatory (6/2008) - RCW 26.09.0300 
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...