Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
No. 12-144
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
 
 _________ 
D
ENNIS
H
OLLINGSWORTH
,
ET AL
.,
Petitioners 
,
 
v.
RISTIN
M.
 
P
ERRY 
,
ET AL
.,
Respondents.
 
 _________ 
On Writ of Certiorari To The United StatesCourt Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
 _________ 
BRIEF OF
AMICI CURIAE
THE CALIFORNIATEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND THE NATIONALEDUCATION ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OFRESPONDENTS
 _________ 
C
HRISTOPHER
L.
 
L
EBSOCK 
 A 
RTHUR
N.
 
B
 AILEY 
,
 
J
R
.(C
OUNSEL OF
R
ECORD
)H
 AUSFELD
LLP44 Montgomery Street,Suite 3400San Francisco, CA 94104Phone: (415) 633-1908Fax: (415) 358-4980abailey@hausfeldllp.com
 Attorneys for Amici Curiae 
 
 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PageTABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................ iTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...................................... iiiINTEREST OF
 AMICI CURIAE 
............................... 1SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 3 ARGUMENT .............................................................. 5I. PROPOSITION 8 IS NOT RATIONALLY RELATED TO ANY LEGITIMATE STATEINTEREST CONCERNING PUBLICEDUCATION ................................................... 5 A. THE ALLEGED INTEREST INPROTECTING CHILDREN FROMBEING TAUGHT THAT MARRIAGEBETWEEN PERSONS OF THE SAMESEX IS EQUIVALENT TO MARRIAGEBETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN ISBASED ON DISCRIMINATORY  ANIMUS ..................................................... 6B. IN ANY EVENT, PROPOSITION 8 WILLNOT ALTER CALIFORNIA’S PUBLICSCHOOL CURRICULUM ......................... 9
 
 ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED
II. THE PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL IMPACTOF PROPOSITION 8 IS TO FURTHERSTIGMATIZE GAY AND LESBIANSTUDENTS, AND TO UNDERMINEEDUCATOR EFFORTS TO FOSTER ANINCLUSIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTFOR ALL STUDENTS .................................... 12CONCLUSION ........................................................... 18
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more