Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
NOTICE OF CLAIM [part-1-2-3]

NOTICE OF CLAIM [part-1-2-3]

Ratings: (0)|Views: 521|Likes:
Published by Marc Boyer
AS EXPECTED - The Registrar block me from filing anything - for he record - this is what they refuse to rule on.
AS EXPECTED - The Registrar block me from filing anything - for he record - this is what they refuse to rule on.

More info:

Categories:Business/Law
Published by: Marc Boyer on Mar 02, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/02/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Part 1:STATEMENT OF FACTS
1.This need to seek remedy was created by a Superintendent of Customer Service for CANADA POST, who works out of Fredericton N.B. As to his advice, he invited me to seek remedy thru acivil motion in BC.; as opposed to filing my complaint under criminal charges for violating Sec.337 CCC by refusing to deliver my mail that has a tracking # 0644 7490 0113 6391 A] This box has a total weight parcel of 2.193 kilos that held about $700 worth of shake [low-grade cannabis leaf]. It was mailed to Marc Boyer thru CANADA POST, from Nelson BC, and thislanding address happens to be an EDA headquarters for the Marijuana Party of Canada.2.[As to APPENDIX #1] i presented proof of this status at the Vancouver Post Office and postalemployees gave me a tracking report on the parcel. I made it clear that under Sec 337 CCC, iwas demanding that the parcel be delivered and no oath holding Post Office official complied. A] They sighted that they were under orders of the Attorney General of Canada, and invited meto file in BC Supreme Court to resolve my complaint that i have been robbed of my property bythese employees, who are acting as if automatons, by insisting that no one had the authority tomake a call of [in this case] that there was at face value as valid reason for there being anexception to the strict rules and regulations set forth by the A. G. Of Canada3.In a desire to find a swift remedy, i contacted the Vancouver Police Department [VPD] and afternumerous attempts to explain my circumstances, i was told my inspectors that they would noteven open a case file number on my complaint, and they refused to assist me in retrieving myproperty, and in law that's obstruction to enforce Sec 337 CCC, and in so doing become anaccomplice to the crime of violating Sec 337 CCC, and Sec 336 CCC for Criminal Breach of Fiduciary Trust, of never robbing anything from a free man, thru arbitrary power.4.Due to the fact that under a necessity defence, i am left with no other option but to take thenext reasonable course of action, which is to file a civil motion in BC Supreme Court, and in thisway offer a civil means to fix this complaint of being robbed of my mail [as opposed to stolen] A] Due to past interference by the Registrar at 800 Smythe Street, i thought it prudent to firstfiled this attached 7-page Notice and Outline, dated Feb 15
th
, 20135.On Feb 22
nd
, 2013, i went to The Mayor's Office, where I was told that they had nothing on file,and knew nothing about my notice, and refused to investigate any further. A] I then went across the street to the legal department of the City of Vancouver to inform themof what just happened at the Mayor's Office, and in response to my plea to talk to the one incharge of responding to this notice, i got a call from Ben Parkin, who is the Assistant Director of Legal Services, who at that time did nothing to resolve my complaint, but he did understand myoffer that if anyone at the City intervened on my behalf to have my mail delivered that i wouldstop all further actions, and in fairness gave him a verbal notice that i would be seeking civilremedy, before filing criminal charges under Sec 337 CCCB] I then went to VPD Headquarters, where an Inspector Newman, confirmed that hisDepartment was not prepared to investigate, act on, or open a file on my complaint; He informedme that my status as as freeman was meaningless to them, and in so doing violated Sec 336CCC: Criminal Breach of Fiduciary trust for the systemic trampling of my genuine right to betreated with respect for the fact that am a freeman with certain inalienable rights that citizenswith Birth Certificates don't have.C] I then went to The Attorney General of Canada's Office, and was informed that there was noone who could civilly intervene or even get resolved my complaintD] In so doing, i am left with other option than to file for remedy in a civil court.
 
Part 2: RELIEF SOUGHT from Denis Lebel
6.A civil remedy is being sought, before pursuing the alternative of pressing criminalindictments against Denis Lebel for violating Sec 337 CCC and Sec 336 CCC7.There is no immediate issue of suing Denis Lebel for money. With this Motion, i'm merelycivilly asking any local representative of him to appear on Short Leave, and civilly defendhis actual position, and for the record, justify why he is refusing to intervene in havingmy mail delivered, when the very nature of his Ministry is to insure that exceptions to thestrict rules and regulations he enforces at CANADA POST can exist, let alone must beapplied in my somewhat unique situation.8.With this motion – i'm seeking a Judge to act on behalf of the A.G. of B.C., to rule on theweight of the evidence, being pressed by me and Denis Lebel who is responsible forCANADA POST, in order to avoid what appears at face value to be criminal charges.
Part 2: RELIEF SOUGHT from Robert Nicholson,as a third party Defendant to my complaint.
 A civil remedy is being sought through this motion because at face value, there seems tobe no ability, for me, to civilly negotiate anything with anyone at the A.G. of Canada'sOffice, in Vancouver.9.There is no immediate issue of suing Robert Nickelson for money. With this Motion, i'mmerely civilly asking any local representative of him to appear on Short Leave, and civillydefend his actual position, and for the record, justify why he is refusing to intervene inhaving my mail delivered, when the very nature of his Ministry is to insure thatexceptions to the strict rules and regulations he set forth at CANADA POST can exist, letalone must be applied in my somewhat unique situation.10.With this motion – i'm seeking a Judge to act on behalf of the A.G. of B.C., to rule on theweight of the evidence, being pressed by me and Robert Nicholson who is the Ofice of the A.G. of Canada, in order to avoid what appears to be perversion of the law
Part 2: RELIEF SOUGHT from Gregor Robertson,as a third party Defendant to my complaint.
11.A civil remedy is being sought through this motion because at face value, there seems tobe no ability, for me, to civilly negotiate anything with anyone at the Mayor's Office12.There is no immediate issue of suing him or the City for money. With this Motion, i'mmerely civilly asking any local representative of him to appear and defend his actualposition, and for the record, justify why he is refusing to intervene in having VPD or hislegal department assist in my mail delivered, when the very nature of him standing-under the SCC Pitfield decisions means that i MUST be graced with equal protection13.With this motion – i'm seeking a Judge to act on behalf of the A.G. of B.C., to rule on theweight of the evidence, being pressed by me and Gregor Robertson who holds theMayor's Office, in order to avoid what appears at face value to be criminal charges.
NOTICE OF LIABIITY to all Defendants:
 Failure to comply with reaching an amicable civil agreement means I will proceed withcriminal charges, which as outlined in my Feb 15
th
NOTICE this is problematic.
 
Part 3: LEGAL BASIS for seeking a civil remedy.
14.
Defense under the Supremacy of God and the rule of law. A]
The 1
st
sentence of the rule of law can be interpreted to mean that especially BCSupreme Court rulings that favour me, must be respected by the Offices that all theseprivate individuals represent because the use of arbitrary power by their Office is directlyprohibited from being blankly applied onto an Officer of a recognized Official Party of Canada, especially when i'm standing under my Party's RUBRIC.
B]
In law and in fact, the very nature for why there are 2 members of Parliament incharge of CANADA POST is to intervene, when called upon to do so, and a Sec 337 CCCdemand to deliver the mail means they must intervene and at least explain why theirOffices are not making an exception in my case, when my status of being a Party Officerentitles me to have my RUBRIC respected, by precluding the abuse of power.
C]
I am an Officer of the Marijuana Party of Canada, and that means under Sec 15 of the Charter, we MUST be respected, as being all equal before and under the law;
D]
[As to APPENDIX # 4] The A.G., especially, is held by oath under Sec 336 CCC tonot violate the fiduciary trust of abusing the powers contained in Sec 126 CCC, onto anOfficer of a recognized Party in Parliament
15.
FURTHERMORE:
All Defendants face an additional liability of violating Sec 336 CCC forCriminal Breach of Fiduciary Trust [as opposed to Judiciary Trust] because i'm also agenuine free man on the land and their oath directly prohibits them from partaking inrobbing a free man, under Sec 340 CCC: By destroying documents of TitleNAMELY: FRAUD Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels,conceals or obliterates (a) a document of title to goods or lands, (b) a valuable securityor testamentary instrument, or (c) a judicial or official document, is guilty of anindictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.a. My title document were cancelled and concealed for fraudulent purposes, by WallyOppal, in 2004 and everyone acts like this is the be all and end all to a legal means toviolate the most fundamental Constitutional rights of being Free.b. There is simply nothing more valuable then to be a genuine free man. I am not asecurity called a WAREHOUSE RECEIPT and without a Birth Certificate, no body cancreate a testamentary instrument [aka PERSON] that can be charged under the CCC, orthe BNA Act, or the CC, or the Charter of Rights, or NAFTA, because it's directlyprohibited under even respondeat superior to arbitrarily force a PERSON onto me.c. Under respondeat superior. it's directly prohibited from imposing Maritime jurisdictionon a free man. FURTHERMORE under the Supremacy of Parliament, i can and amseeking protection under the Elections Act, where it's understood to be the last placewhere a human being still has rights, and under Freedom of Expression this extends toprotecting and making a profit by upholding our Party RUBRIC, as prescribed by law,under the Longley Loophole, as outlined in APPENDIX # 5.
16.
BY DEFINITION, by being a free man and a private individual in Parliament makes anyruling that is contrary to our RUBRIC, a violation of Sec 336 CCC and 337 CCC, andFrankly a crime of Treachery [collusion with the Treasury] under Commonwealth Law.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->