Part 3: LEGAL BASIS for seeking a civil remedy.
Defense under the Supremacy of God and the rule of law. A]
sentence of the rule of law can be interpreted to mean that especially BCSupreme Court rulings that favour me, must be respected by the Offices that all theseprivate individuals represent because the use of arbitrary power by their Office is directlyprohibited from being blankly applied onto an Officer of a recognized Official Party of Canada, especially when i'm standing under my Party's RUBRIC.
In law and in fact, the very nature for why there are 2 members of Parliament incharge of CANADA POST is to intervene, when called upon to do so, and a Sec 337 CCCdemand to deliver the mail means they must intervene and at least explain why theirOffices are not making an exception in my case, when my status of being a Party Officerentitles me to have my RUBRIC respected, by precluding the abuse of power.
I am an Officer of the Marijuana Party of Canada, and that means under Sec 15 of the Charter, we MUST be respected, as being all equal before and under the law;
[As to APPENDIX # 4] The A.G., especially, is held by oath under Sec 336 CCC tonot violate the fiduciary trust of abusing the powers contained in Sec 126 CCC, onto anOfficer of a recognized Party in Parliament
All Defendants face an additional liability of violating Sec 336 CCC forCriminal Breach of Fiduciary Trust [as opposed to Judiciary Trust] because i'm also agenuine free man on the land and their oath directly prohibits them from partaking inrobbing a free man, under Sec 340 CCC: By destroying documents of TitleNAMELY: FRAUD Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels,conceals or obliterates (a) a document of title to goods or lands, (b) a valuable securityor testamentary instrument, or (c) a judicial or official document, is guilty of anindictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.a. My title document were cancelled and concealed for fraudulent purposes, by WallyOppal, in 2004 and everyone acts like this is the be all and end all to a legal means toviolate the most fundamental Constitutional rights of being Free.b. There is simply nothing more valuable then to be a genuine free man. I am not asecurity called a WAREHOUSE RECEIPT and without a Birth Certificate, no body cancreate a testamentary instrument [aka PERSON] that can be charged under the CCC, orthe BNA Act, or the CC, or the Charter of Rights, or NAFTA, because it's directlyprohibited under even respondeat superior to arbitrarily force a PERSON onto me.c. Under respondeat superior. it's directly prohibited from imposing Maritime jurisdictionon a free man. FURTHERMORE under the Supremacy of Parliament, i can and amseeking protection under the Elections Act, where it's understood to be the last placewhere a human being still has rights, and under Freedom of Expression this extends toprotecting and making a profit by upholding our Party RUBRIC, as prescribed by law,under the Longley Loophole, as outlined in APPENDIX # 5.
BY DEFINITION, by being a free man and a private individual in Parliament makes anyruling that is contrary to our RUBRIC, a violation of Sec 336 CCC and 337 CCC, andFrankly a crime of Treachery [collusion with the Treasury] under Commonwealth Law.