Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
© 2002 by CRC Press LLC
6
Microstrip PatchAntennas
Edge-Fed PatchesProbe-Fed PatchesAperture-CoupledPatchesProximity-Coupled Patches
Parasitically Coupled (or Gap-Coupled) PatchesStackedMicrostrip PatchesLarge Slot Aperture-Coupled PatchesAperture-Stacked PatchesAlternative Printed AntennaSolutions
Single-Feed Circular Polarization Patch AntennaDual-FeedCircular Polarization Patch AntennaSynchronous Subarrays
Noncontact Feed MechanismsAntennas with ReducedSurface Wave ExcitationStacked Patch StructuresPatchAntennas on Photonic Bandgap StructuresExamples of Integrated Antennas
6.1Introduction
Microstrip patch antennas were first proposed in the early 1970s and since then a plethora of activity inthis area of antenna engineering has occurred, probably more than in any other field of antenna researchand development. Microstrip patch antennas have several well-known advantages over other antennastructures, including their low profile and hence conformal nature, light weight, low cost of production,robust nature, and compatibility with microwave monolithic integrated circuits (MMICs) and optoelec-tronic integrated circuits (OEICs) technologies. Because of these merits, forms of the microstrip patchantenna have been utilized in many applications such as in mobile communication base stations, space-borne satellite communication systems, and even mobile communication handset terminals.Unfortunately, the expression, “there is no such thing as a free lunch,” also applies to microstrip patchtechnology. Despite the previously mentioned features, microstrip patch antennas suffer from severalinherent disadvantages of this technology in its pure form, namely, they have small bandwidth andrelatively poor radiation efficiency resulting from surface wave excitation and conductor and dielectriclosses. Also, to accurately predict the performance of this form of radiator, in particular, its inputimpedance nature, typically a full-wave computationally intensive numerical analysis is required.
Rod Waterhouse
RMIT University 
 
© 2002 by CRC Press LLC
Probably the saving grace of the microstrip patch antenna that prevented this technology from becom-ing one of the numerous white elephant technologies was its ease of fabrication or development. Becauseof this characteristic, universities and other research institutions (with somewhat limited budgets)throughout the world could make serious impacts on the shortcomings of microstrip patch technologywithout incurring huge expenses. Fortunately, because of the efforts of many research and developmentteams throughout the world, most of these issues have been addressed and solved so that the area of microstrip patch antennas is a thriving technology and will continue to be for many years to come. The outline of this chapter is as follows: Section 6.2 gives a brief review of the general characteristicsof a single-layer microstrip patch antenna, including performance trends as a function of the dielectricmaterial used to form the radiating element. From this some of the shortcomings of this technology areevident. Also in this section, the different conductor shapes used for metallic patch conductor areexamined, highlighting the pros and cons of each shape. Section 6.3 presents the different excitationmethods for a microstrip patch antenna, including edge fed, probe fed, proximity coupled, and aperturecoupled. Advantages and disadvantages of each technique are presented. In Section 6.4, methods toenhance the bandwidth of a microstrip patch antenna are summarized, including using parasitic elements,such as a stacked-patch configuration. In this section a brief comparison to other broadband printedantenna technologies are given, highlighting the advantages of disadvantages of each. Section 6.5 gives abrief summary on techniques for generating circular and dual polarization using microstrip patchtechnology. Section 6.6 looks into means of reducing the conductor size of the microstrip patch antennaand also the issues related to doing this, including the effect on bandwidth and gain. Section 6.7 sum-marizes some of the problems associated with integrating printed antennas with active circuits and howhigh-performance, fully monolithic solutions can be obtained. Finally, examples of integrated activepatches are presented.
6.2General Characteristics
Figure 6.1 shows a schematic diagram of a microstrip patch antenna. Here an arbitrarily shaped metallicconductor is etched on a grounded dielectric laminates. A microstrip patch antenna is a resonant-styleradiator so one of its dimensions must be approximately
λ 
g
/2, where
λ 
g
is a guided wavelength takinginto consideration the surrounding environment of the printed antenna. It is apparent that the propertiesof the substrate, namely, its dielectric constant,
ε
and its height play a fundamental role in the perfor-mance of the printed antenna. For a detailed explanation of how a microstrip patch antenna conceptuallyoperates in terms of equivalent slots, etc., please consult one of the many articles on this subject.
1
Figure 6.2 shows some very important performance trends of a single-layer microstrip patch antennaperformance as a function of the laminate properties used to fabricate the antenna. These performancetrends represent the properties of microstrip patch antennas in their pure form with a simple, idealexcitation method. Although the trends are for rectangular patches, other conductor shapes have similarresponses. InFig. 6.2a,the impedance bandwidth (defined as 10-dB return loss) is given for various
FIGURE 6.1
Schematic diagram of arbitrarily shaped microstrip patch antenna.
Patch conductor Edge feedingGrounded substratePatch conductor Edge feedingGrounded substrate
 
© 2002 by CRC Press LLC
FIGURE 6.2
Performance trends of single-layered microstrip patch antenna: (a) impedance bandwidth; (b) direc-tivity; (c) surface wave efficiency.
ε
= 1.0
ε
= 2.2
ε
= 10.2
Substrate thickness, d/
0
0.05.010.00.0250.050
   B  a  n   d  w   i   d   t   h ,   %
0.025
(a)
ε
= 1.0
ε
= 2.2
ε
= 10.2
Substrate thickness, d/
0
0.05.010.00.0250.050
   D   i  r  e  c   t   i  v   i   t  y ,   d   B
(b)
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more