• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,Plaintiff,v.BARRY SOETORO,
et al
.,Defendants.:::::::::Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Instead of the opposition plaintiff was ordered to fileby 2/13/09 (or defendants' motion to dismiss would be granted asconceded, see [#10]), what plaintiff filed was (a) the affidavitof a paralegal (who works in the office of a Pennsylvania lawyerwho has not been admitted to practice in this Court), complainingabout her treatment by an employee of the Clerk's Office, and(b) many blank pages, decorated only by what appear to bebotanical drawings and the illegible photocopy of an Hawaiiancertificate of live birth. (a) The affidavit was apparentlyintended as a response to my earlier observation that plaintiff'smotion to file interpleader was frivolous, see [#2], [#10], theargument being, "Maureen Higgins made me do it." What wasfrivolous about the motion, however, was not the fact that it wasfiled, but the suggestion that "duties" could be filed in theregistry of this court. (b) The blank pages were eithersomebody's idea of a joke (in which case I don't get it) or amistake. If the latter, plaintiffs have until 5:00 pm EST on
Case 1:08-cv-02254-JR Document 14 Filed 02/25/2009 Page 1 of 2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...