Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Cpac Position Paper 2013 Closings

Cpac Position Paper 2013 Closings

Ratings: (0)|Views: 11|Likes:
Published by nycparentsunion
Cpac Position Paper 2013 Closings
Cpac Position Paper 2013 Closings

More info:

Published by: nycparentsunion on Mar 04, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/11/2013

pdf

text

original

 
info@cpacnyc.orghttps://sites.google.com/a/cpacnyc.org/cpacnyc/home
School Closings and Phase Outs
 The Bloomberg administration has closed more than 140 schools since mayoral control began in 2002 withno evidence that the administration’s closure policy has improved outcomes for our students in New YorkCity's struggling schools. Studies from Chicago indicate that the students in closing schools do not improveacademically in their new schools.
[1]
Several New York City studies suggest that the new small schools thatare designed to replace large failing high schools , do not enroll the students who would have attendedthose large schools had they not been closed. As a matter of fact past reports including one form the CEJfound the new schools serve a less needy population.Research focused on high schools undergoing closure (the process in New York City involves a four-yearphase-out) suggests a higher dropout rate as well as large numbers of unaccounted for students.
[2]
 Thisyear the city moves to close a record 62 schools. Interestingly enough many of the schools beingsuggested for closure are the new schools created to solve the issue of our existing failing schools. The Mayor has unilaterally made these decisions, as there is little question that the Panel for EducationalPolicy will approve any list, since a majority of its members are appointed by the mayor. The decision toclose/phase out schools is sometimes based on the Department of Education report card called a progressreport. The big problem is there is no consistency or transparency on the selection of schools. ProgressReports are supposed to help parents, teachers, principals, and school communities understand schools'strengths and weaknesses but ultimately are used to judge a school by a final grade. Progress Reportsgrade each school with an A, B, C, D, or F and are based student progress (60%), student performance(25%), and school environment (15%). These final grades are use as a tool, to close and phase out schools.Scores are also based on comparing results from one school to a peer group of up to 40 schools with themost similar student population and to all schools citywide, according to the DOE.(http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/tools/report/default.htm ) These peer groups have never followed asensible formula and often group schools with others school with different demographics, total number of students, different areas, and different sub group make ups.Given the damage and disruption the city’s closure policycreates and the lack of evidence that these closings improve student outcomes many parent entities aswell as non-profit organizations related to education, have called on the DOE to stop concentrating high-needs students in struggling schools and, instead, develop interventions and supports to help all schoolsbuild their capacity to effectively educate these students. At the numerous "pre-engagement" hearingsthat are held for schools the DOE is looking to close, the DOE offers wonderful support and programs whilephasing out the schools as opposed to offering this support at first discovery of struggling.Certainly, there are instances in which closure is the best option for a school that is too dysfunctional toimprove. There are many tools at the DOE's disposal such as PPRs (Principal Performance Reviews),Principal and Assistant Principal Observations and data inquiry teams which can tell us many things abouta school's functionality. We also have District Leadership Teams (DLTs) to support our School Leadership Teams (SLTs) that can help us in determining if a school is dysfunctional or not. However, under theBloomberg administration, school closure has substituted for a real, comprehensive strategy to improvestruggling schools serving the city’s highest needs students
.
Approved by CPAC
 
Proposal:
A
moratorium on new closings until the following has occurred:
1.Redesign the progress report to reflect performance at a higher percentage than growth andremove the peer group.
2.
 The DOE should develop and implement an inspection system to provide early warnings of deteriorating school performance to complement the newly revised progress report.
3.
All support offered to these phase out schools should be offered to them at the first sign of lowperformance to support them in their endeavors to become successful and it should be targetedsupport. Once
the above is addressed, all
proposals toclose/phase out NYC public schools must be approved by the district Community Education Council inwhich the school resides. Before a vote can be taken, the CEC shall solicit advice from the affectedSchool Leadership Team(s), District Leadership Team, the district Presidents Council and othercommunity organizations in that community. In the case of high schools, the district CEC shall alsoconsider the advice of the Citywide Council on High Schools, in addition to the organizations listedabove.Norm Fruchter, the senior policy analyst at the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, a nonprofiteducational research and policy group, said the group analyzed the elementary and middle schools on thecity’s list and found they had much higher percentages of black and Latino students than the cityaverage, as well as much higher percentages of pupils qualifying for free lunches than the city average.Also, “they have a higher percentage of special ed, a higher percentage of English-language learners anda higher percentage of special education students in self-contained classes.”“It looks like these schoolsgot these extra percentages in the years before they were tapped for closing,” he said. “They are closingthe schools that have the most challenges, rather than trying to intervene to end the cycle of just closingthe school and sending the kids somewhere else, and then when they get the same results they will justclose that school.” (http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/city-names-17-schools-slated-to-close/) The research is clear: Closing New York City’s lowest-performing schools is not and has not been effective. Just as teachers must develop their capacity to differentiate instruction for students with varying needs,the DOE must develop the capacity and ability to support improvement efforts differentiated for thespecific needs of struggling schools. Instead of setting up these schools to fail and then closing them, theDOE should implement a policy of strategic, systemic interventions backed by resources and supports.With ineffective school closures occurring all over the country, New York City which is the largest schooldistrict in the country , has the potential to become a nationwide model for how to improve strugglingschools rather than close them. The administrations of schools should be answerable to theSuperintendent, the teachers answerable to the administration and the schools answerable to thecommunity but the DOE is answerable to all and we believe that the support to schools should be first andforemost a priority.
REFERENCES:
[1]
Julia Gwynne and Marisade la Torre;(Chicago: Chicago Consortium on School Research, 2009)
Approved by CPAC

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->