Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Sample Procurement Monitoring Report (DBP - LPG Cars 06-29-04)

Sample Procurement Monitoring Report (DBP - LPG Cars 06-29-04)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 240|Likes:
Published by Toix Cerna
This is a procurement monitoring report I wrote as a novice procurement observer.
This is a procurement monitoring report I wrote as a novice procurement observer.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: Toix Cerna on Mar 04, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Supply and Delivery of Eight (8) units – LPG PoweredVehicles
Development Bank of the PhilippinesSen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue Cor. Makati AvenueMakati City, Metro Manila
Procurement Activity:
Submission and Opening of Bids
June 29, 2004
Toix Cerna (TAN Research and Advocacy Officer)Leslie Flores (TAN Research Associate)
Report by:
On June 21, TAN received an invitation from the Development Bank of the Philippines(DBP) to attend the procurement activity above-mentioned on June 29, 2004. Uponreceipt, TAN sent via fax a confirmation letter dated June 22, which indicated theattendance of the above-mentioned observers to the said activity. Included also in theletter was a request for documents pertaining to the activity for purposes of backgroundinformation and as evidence of regularity of previously conducted activities in relation tothe bidding of the goods above-mentioned. TAN received two sets of the requesteddocuments from DBP days before the Submission and Opening of Bids, which was justenough time for the observers to review the documents.In the review of documents, nothing out of the ordinary and regular was found by theobservers. It was noted by the observers, however, that this bidding was a correctedversion of an earlier advertised bid for “Toyota Corolla” vehicles. In the documentation, itwas correctly cited by the DBP BAC Secretariat that reference to brand names isprohibited as per Government Procurement Reform Act (GPRA) provisions (Section 18).The TAN observers regretfully arrived at the bid venue 15 minutes late (10:15 a.m.) butwere nonetheless warmly welcomed by the members of the DBP BAC and Secretariat.The tardiness of the observers did not cause adverse effects on the bid proceedings asthere had been no issue of late submission on the part of the bidders. There was onlyone bidder (Toyota Pasong Tamo) that participated and whose arrival had been beforethe set deadline (10:00 a.m.).The proceedings are noted to have been strictly observant of the new procurement law.During the proceedings, TAN raised questions as to the characteristics of the good thatis being bid out – the questions more directed towards the issue of whether it is onlyToyota that has the capability of providing the good that is being bid out. The BAC
members clarified that they assumed that Mitsubishi and Ford have the capacity toprovide the good being bid out as two franchises of the manufacturers above-mentioned(Union Motor Mitsubishi Paco and Ford Edsa) bought bid documents. A BAC member also clarified that the technology required (LPG-powered) by DBP for the 8 vehicles isnot a Toyota technology and that the conversion to an LPG-powered vehicle isseparately done by another company.The BAC members also explained the rationale for procuring LPG-powered vehicles. Itwas mentioned that DBP has an Environmental Management System with certificationfrom ISO and through such program, it would require them to procure environment-friendly vehicles such as the LPG-powered. They also reiterated that they obtained theapproval of the President in procuring LPG-powered vehicles. A BAC member alsomentioned that the government has a policy of procuring LPG-powered vehicles. Thiswas later on corrected by the BAC Secretariat and said that there is no writtengovernment policy to that effect but that nonetheless DBP was allowed by thegovernment to procure the same goods by virtue of its EMS plan.TAN also noted that there was another Toyota franchise (Toyota Marikina) that boughtbid documents but failed to participate in the procurement of the goods in this subject.The proceedings were concluded with Toyota Pasong Tamo as the winner after proper review of eligibility, technical and financial documents. The TAN observers, in agreementto the regularity of the proceedings that ensued then, signed on the bid abstract alongwith the BAC members of DBP.
During the review of eligibility documents, TAN noted that one of the incorporators of Toyota Pasong Tamo (Mr. Arturo Macapagal) had the same surname as the BAC head(Mr. Vivencio Macapagal), which prompted the observers to research on their relationship with one another vis-à-vis the “conflict of interest” prohibition. TAN failed toestablish any relationship between the two but found that Mr. Arturo Macapagal, whohappens to be the Chief Executive Officer of Toyota Pasong Tamo, is a half-brother of the President and the President was the one who approved the request of the agency inits procurement of LPG-powered vehicles.TAN was furnished a copy of DBP’s letter to Department of Budget and Management(DBM) Secretary Emilia Boncodin dated August 21, 2003. The letter cited previouscommunications between the Office of the President and DBP regarding the purchase of LPG-powered vehicles. According to the letter, the President approved DBP’s requeston November 2, 2002. Another letter, dated March 1, 2004 and signed by ExecutiveSecretary Alberto Romulo, authorized DBP to purchase 8 LPG-powered vehicles.When asked of the Annual Procurement Plan, a DBP representative said that their planis yet to be approved by the agency head. According to the representative, DBP has hadno procurement plan and that this is their first time to have one as per requirement bythe GPRA. TAN notes, however, that DBP has been inviting them to procurementactivities related to 9 goods without the necessary “guidance” of an APP.Because of the fact that there was only one participant-bidder (Toyota Pasong Tamo),TAN felt the need to validate whether the other supposed participants (Union Motor and

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->