Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Opinion Affirming PI of Day Laborer Provisions (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion Affirming PI of Day Laborer Provisions (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 421|Likes:
Published by J Cox
Ninth Circuit opinion affirming preliminary injunction of day laborer provisions of Arizona's SB1070.
Ninth Circuit opinion affirming preliminary injunction of day laborer provisions of Arizona's SB1070.

More info:

Categories:Business/Law
Published by: J Cox on Mar 04, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/04/2013

pdf

text

original

 
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
V
ALLE
D
EL
S
OL
I
 NCORPORATED
;C.M., a minor; J
OSE
A
 NGEL
V
ARGAS
;
 
C
OALICION
D
E
D
ERECHOS
H
UMANOS
;
 
U
 NITED
F
OOD AND
C
OMMERCIAL
W
ORKERS
I
 NTERNATIONAL
U
 NION
;
 
B
ORDER 
A
CTION
 N
ETWORK 
;
 
J
IM
S
HEE
;
 
L
UZ
S
ANTIAGO
;
 
A
RIZONA
S
OUTH
A
SIANSFO
S
AFE
F
AMILIES
;
 
J
APANESE
A
MERICAN
C
ITIZENS
L
EAGUE
;L
OCAL
5
 
S
ERVICE
E
MPLOYEES
I
 NTERNATIONAL
U
 NION
;
 
S
OUTHSIDE
P
RESBYTERIAN
C
HURCH
;
 
M
USLIM
A
MERICAN
S
OCIETY
;
 
T
ONATIERRA
C
OMMUNITY
D
EVELOPMENT
I
 NSTITUTE
;
 
A
SIAN
C
HAMBER OF
C
OMMERCE OF
A
RIZONA
;
 
S
ERVICE
E
MPLOYEES
I
 NTERNATIONAL
U
 NION
;A
RIZONA
H
ISPANIC
C
HAMBER OF
C
OMMERCE
;
 
P
EDRO
E
SPINOZA
;M
AURA
C
ASTILLO
;
 
M
ARIA
M
ORALES
,
 Plaintiffs-Appellees
,v.M
ICHAEL
B.
 
W
HITING
;
 
E
DWARD
G.
HEINHEIMER 
;
 
D
AVID
W.
 
OZEMA
;D
AISY
F
LORES
;
 
ENNY
A
 NGLE
; No. 12-15688D.C. No.2:10-cv-01061-SRBOPINION
Case: 12-15688 03/04/2013 ID: 8534709 DktEntry: 62-1 Page: 1 of 35
(1 of 40)
 
V
ALLE DEL
S
OL V
.
 
W
HITING
2D
EREK 
D.
 
APIER 
;
 
S
AM
V
EDERMAN
;
ICHARD
M.
 
OMLEY
;
 
M
ATTHEW
J.S
MITH
;
 
B
RADLEY
C
ARLYON
;B
ARBARA
L
AWALL
;
 
J
AMES
P.W
ALSH
;
 
G
EORGE
S
ILVA
;
 
S
HILA
S.P
OLK 
;
 
J
ON
R.
 
S
MITH
, CountyAttorneys in their official capacities;J
OSEPH
D
EDMAN
,
 
J
.;
 
L
ARRY
A.D
EVER 
;
 
B
ILL
P
RIBIL
;
 
J
OHN
R.A
RMER 
;
 
P
RESTON
J.
 
A
LLRED
;S
TEVEN
 N.
 
T
UCKER 
;
 
D
ONALD
L
OWERY
;
 
J
OSEPH
M.
 
A
RPAIO
;
 
T
OM
S
HEAHAN
;
 
ELLY
C
LARK 
;C
LARENCE
W.
 
D
UPNIK 
;
 
P
AUL
R.B
ABEU
;
 
T
ONY
E
STRADA
;
 
S
TEVE
W
AUGH
;
 
ALPH
O
GDEN
, CountySheriffs, in their official capacities,
 Defendants
,andS
TATE OF
A
RIZONA
;
 
J
ANICE
K.B
REWER 
,
 Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants
.Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the District of ArizonaSusan R. Bolton, District Judge, PresidingArgued and SubmittedOctober 17, 2012—San Francisco, California
Case: 12-15688 03/04/2013 ID: 8534709 DktEntry: 62-1 Page: 2 of 35
(2 of 40)
 
V
ALLE DEL
S
OL V
.
 
W
HITING
3
This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has
*
 been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.
Filed March 4, 2013Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Richard C. Tallman andConsuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.Opinion by Judge Fisher 
SUMMARY
*
Civil Rights
The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction barring the enforcement of two provisions in Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070, which make itunlawful for a motor vehicle occupant to hire or attempt tohire a person for work at another location from a stopped car that impedes traffic, or for a person to be hired in such amanner.The panel held that the district court correctly determinedthat, though Arizona has a significant government interest in promoting traffic safety, the day labor provisions failed therequirement set forth in
Central Hudson Gas & ElectricCorp. v. Public Service Commission of New York 
, 447 U.S.557, 566 (1980), that restrictions on commercial speech be nomore extensive than necessary to serve that interest. The panel held that the district court did not abuse its discretion inconcluding that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the
Case: 12-15688 03/04/2013 ID: 8534709 DktEntry: 62-1 Page: 3 of 35
(3 of 40)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->