Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
NOTICE OF LODGING BRETT L. GIBBS' [PROPOSED! ORDER RE OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF MORGAN E. PIETZ, SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MORGAN E. PIETZ AND DECLARATIONS OF BART HUFFMAN AND CAMILLE D. KERR AND EXHIBITS THERETO Case No. 2:12-CV-8333-ODW

NOTICE OF LODGING BRETT L. GIBBS' [PROPOSED! ORDER RE OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF MORGAN E. PIETZ, SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MORGAN E. PIETZ AND DECLARATIONS OF BART HUFFMAN AND CAMILLE D. KERR AND EXHIBITS THERETO Case No. 2:12-CV-8333-ODW

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 183|Likes:
Published by copyrightclerk
NOTICE OF LODGING BRETT L.
GIBBS' [PROPOSED! ORDER RE
OBJECTIONS TO THE
DECLARATION OF MORGAN E.
PIETZ, SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATION OF MORGAN E.
PIETZ AND DECLARATIONS OF
BART HUFFMAN AND CAMILLE
D. KERR AND EXHIBITS
THERETO

Case No. 2:12-CV-8333-ODW
NOTICE OF LODGING BRETT L.
GIBBS' [PROPOSED! ORDER RE
OBJECTIONS TO THE
DECLARATION OF MORGAN E.
PIETZ, SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATION OF MORGAN E.
PIETZ AND DECLARATIONS OF
BART HUFFMAN AND CAMILLE
D. KERR AND EXHIBITS
THERETO

Case No. 2:12-CV-8333-ODW

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: copyrightclerk on Mar 05, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/05/2013

pdf

text

original

 
1
2
345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
ANDREW
J.
WAXLER,
SBN
113682
WON
M.
PARK,
SBN
194333
WAXLER•
CARNER4BRODSKY
LLP
1960
East Grand Avenue, Suite
1210
El
Segundo,
California
90245Telephone:
(310)416-1300
Facsimile:
(310)416-1310
e-mail:
a
w
a
x
1
er
@
wcb-law.come-mail: wpark@wcb-law.com
Specially
Appearing for Respondent
BRETT
L.
GIBBSUNITED STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
CENTRAL
DISTRICT
OF
CALIFORNIA
INGENUITY
13
LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.Case No.
2:12-CV-8333-ODW
(JCx)
[Consolidated
with Case Nos.:2:12-cv-6636; 2:12-cv-6669; 2:12-cv-6662;2:12-cv-6668]
[Assigned
to Judge Otis D. Wright, II ]
BRETT
L. GIBBS' [PROPOSED]
ORDER
RE
OBJECTIONS
TO THE
DECLARATION
OF
MORGAN
E.
PIETZ, SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATION
OF
MORGAN
E.
PIETZ
AND
DECLARATIONS
OF
BART
HUFFMAN
AND
CAMILLE
D.
KERR
AND EXHIBITS
THERETO
[Filed
Concurrently with Notice of
Lodging]
Date:
March
11,2013
Time:
1:30 p.m.Dept.: 11
[Complaint
Filed:
September 27,
2012]
Trial
date:
None set
Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 64-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 1 of 97 Page ID #:1194
 
1
2
34567891011
12
13141516171819202122232425262728
TO
ALL
PARTIES AND
THEIRATTORNEYS
OF
RECORD HEREIN:
Respondent Brett
L.
Gibbs submits the
following
proposed order re objectionsto the Declaration of
Morgan
E. Pietz, Supplemental Declaration of
Morgan
E. Pietzand Declarations of Bart
Huffman
and
Camille
D.
Kerr
and exhibits
thereto
submitted in
response
to the Court's February 7,
2013
Order to Show Cause.
UNTIMELINESS
OBJECTIONS
Material
Objected
to:Grounds for
Obiection:
Ruling on
Obiection:
1.
Supplemental Declaration
of
Morgan
E. Pietz and allexhibits
thereto
1.
Untimely fded in
violation
of Court'sFebruary 7,
2013
OrderSustained
Overruled2.
Declaration of Bart
Huffman
and exhibit
thereto
2.
Untimely
fded
in
violation
of Court'sFebruary 7,
2013
OrderSustained
Overruled
3. Declaration of
Camille
D.
Kerr
and all exhibits
thereto
3.Untimely fded in
violation
of Court'sFebruary 7, 2013 OrderSustained
Overruled
OBJECTIONS
TO
DECLARATION
OF
MORGAN
E.
PIETZ
Material
Objected
to:Grounds for
Objection:
Ruling on
Obiection:
1.
Declaration of
Morgan
E.
Pietz, pg. 2
1
4,
as
follows:
My
clients in the Prenda
cases,
including
this case, eachreceived
letters
from their ISPs
informing
them
that
Prenda1.
Irrelevant
(F#£
§§401,
402); Lacks Foundationand/or Personal
Knowledge
(FRE
§602);
Assumes Facts Not In
Evidence;
ImproperSustained
Overruled
1
Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 64-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 2 of 97 Page ID #:1195
 
1
Material
Objected
to:
Grounds
for
Objection:
Ruling on
2
Obiection:
3was attempting to subpoenaCharacterization of4their identity as
part
of a
Evidence.
5
lawsuit.
6
2.
Declaration of
Morgan
2.
Irrelevant
(FRE
§§401,
Sustained7
E.
Pietz, pg. 2
1
4,
as
follows:
402); Lacks Foundation
Overruled
8
Generally,
my clients are theand/or Personal9people who happen to pay the
Knowledge
(FRE
§602);
10
Internet
bill
for theirArgumentative; Assumes11household, not necessarily theFacts Not In Evidence;12people who actually committedImproper Characterization13the alleged infringement or
of
Evidence.
14
other
wrongful conduct.15
3.
Declaration of
Morgan
3.Irrelevant
(FRE
§§401,
Sustained16
E.
Pietz, pg. 2
1
4,
as
follows:
402); Lacks Foundation
Overruled
17
However,
Prenda constructs itsand/or Personal18lawsuits so as to make it
Knowledge
(FRE
§602);
19unclear what exactly is theImproper
Opinion
(FRE §
20
status
of my clients.701); Speculation
(FRE
21
§602);
Argumentative;22Assumes Facts Not In23
Evidence;
Improper24Characterization of25
Evidence.
264. Declaration of
Morgan
4. Irrelevant
(FRE
§§401,
Sustained27
E.
Pietz, pg. 2
f
4, as
follows:
402); Lacks Foundation
Overruled
28
2
Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 64-1 Filed 03/05/13 Page 3 of 97 Page ID #:1196

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->