Supplemental Registration No. 2,861,721
:
For eyeglasses, magnets and computermouse pads; non-metal key rings; beverage glassware, bottle openers, bottlesqueegees, and bottled drinking water.'Plaintiffs business has experienced significant growth, and OBX-branded stickers havebecome popular. At the same time, OBX has become a widely-accepted abbreviation for theOuter Banks.Defendant Bicast, Inc. ("Bicast") was formed in 1989, and is wholly-owned by Williamand Jo Carolyn Gaertner. The company, based in Williamsburg, Virginia, provides souvenirs toregional retail outlets. Since its founding, Defendant has sold many items with geographicabbreviations, including Outer Banks stickers with the abbreviation "OB."According to Defendant, in 2002, Mr. Gaertner's daughter Stacy Harris came up with anew logo: "OBXtreme." Defendant claims that the logo was a combination of its pre-existing"OB" sticker and the phrase "Xtreme," which refers to the many outdoor activities available onthe Outer Banks. In June 2003, Defendant began selling products with the "OBXtreme" logo,including stickers, magnets, postcards, hats and license plates. Defendant claims that its salesfrom "OBXtreme" logo goods have been minimal, accounting for a total of $9,663 in revenuesand $5,030 in gross profits. In April of 2005, Defendant stopped selling "OBXtreme" brandedproducts, pending the outcome of this lawsuit.'Registration on the Principal Register confers a number of substantive and proceduralrights that are unavailable for marks on the Supplemental Register. See IDVN. America
v.
S&MBrands, 26 F. Supp. 2d 815 (E.D. Va. 1998) (citing 3 J. Thomas McCarthy, Trademarks andUnfair Competition
$5
19:9, 19:36 (4th ed. 1996). For example, Principal Registration serves asprima facie evidence of a registrant's exclusive right to use a mark, while SupplementalRegistration has no such effect. Id. Supplemental Registration does not confer any substantivetrademark rights, however, Supplemental Registration has the dual benefits of creating federaljurisdiction for disputes arising over a mark's use, and putting others on notice of a party's use ofthe mark.
Case 2:04-cv-00045-BO Document 32 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 3 of 15
Leave a Comment