for attempting to enforce their Civil and Constitutional Rights;
or an unfair act of extreme, unreasonable discriminatory/bias/prejudice. The Ruling is without authority andeffect and is not merely voidable, but void.
After a continuing dispute with Georgia Power, Plaintiffs, one of which is 100%Federally disabled and receives Supplemental Security Income, filed a verified, primafacie complaint October 26, 2007. Georgia Power filed a verified answer andcounterclaim December 3, 2007.
Plaintiffs moved to strike the verified answers andcounterclaim on March 8, 2008
due to verification and counterclaim containing perjury/false swearing. Plaintiffs moved to stay discovery and all other processes
Attached “Exhibit I”
U.S.C. 42 §12203
: “Prohibition against retaliation and coercion”
(a) Retaliation No personshall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practicemade unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.(b) Interference, coercion, or intimidation It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her havingexercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individualin the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this chapter.(c) Remedies and procedures The remedies and procedures available under sections 12117,12133, and 12188 of this title shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, with respect to subchapter I, subchapter II and subchapter III of this chapter, respectively.
Although the docket reflects the answer and counterclaim was filed December 3, 2007 Plaintiff McDonald called the Court on December 6, 2007 after not receiving an answer and was told byJudge Becker’s Clerk that no answer had yet been filed. This has been brought up several times by Plaintiffs, but they cannot prove what they were told on the telephone by the clerk.
The docket reflects the filing of Motion to Strike on March 12, 2008, but Postal records showdelivered on March 8, 2008 and since all of Georgia Power’s filings reflect the day received bythe Court, it would be only fair that Plaintiffs were treated equally. This too has been shown tothe Court and ignored.2