• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
1
Ayahuasca: An Ethnopharmacologic History
\u00a9 19 98 Dennis J. McKenna, Ph.D.
Introduction

Of t he numerous plant hallucinogens ut ilized by indigenous populat ions of t he Amazon Basin, perhaps none is as int erest ing or complex, bot anically, chemically, or et hnographically, as t he hallucinogenic beverage known variously asay ah u asc a,c aap i, ory ag e. The beverage is most widely known as ay ah u asc a , a Quechua t erm meaning " vine of t he souls," which is applied bot h t o t he beverage it self and t o one of t he source-plant s used in it s preparat ion, t he Malpighiaceous jungle liana, Banist eriopsis caapi (Schult es, 1957). In Brazil, t ranslit erat ion of t his Quechua word int o Port uguese result s in t he name,Ho asc a.A y ahuasc a, or ho asc a, occupies a cent ral posit ion in Mest izo et hnomedicine, and t he chemical nat ure of it s act ive const it uent s and t he manner of it s use makes its st udy relevant to cont emporary issues in neuropharmacology, neurophysiology, and psychiat ry.

What is Ayahuasca?
In a t radit ional cont ext ,A y ahuasc a is a beverage prepared by boiling - or soaking - t he bark
and stems ofBanist eriopsis caapi together with various admixture plants. The admixture
employed most commonly is t he Rubiaceous genusPs y c h o t r i a, part icularly P. viridis. The

leaves ofP. viridis cont ains alkaloids which are necessary for t he psychoact ive ef fectA y ahuasc a is unique in t hat it s pharmacological act ivit y is dependent on a synergist ic int eract ion bet ween t he act ive alkaloids in t he plant s. One of t he component s, t he bark ofBanist eriopsis caapi,

cont ains \u00df-carboline alkaloids, which are pot ent MAO-A inhibit ors; t he ot her component , t he leaves ofPsychot ria viridis or relat ed species, cont ains t he pot ent short -act ing psychoact ive agent N,N-dimet hylt rypt amine (DMT) . DMT is not orally act ive when ingest ed by it self, but can be rendered orally act ive in t he presence of a peripheral MAO inhibit or - and t his

int eract ion is t he basis of t he psychot ropic act ion of ay ah u asc a (McKenna, Towers, & Abbot t , 19 84 ). There are also report s (Schult es, 19 72 ) t hat ot herPs y c h o t r i a species are similarly ut ilized in ot her part s of t he Amazon. In t he Nort hwest Amazon, part icularly in t he Colombian

Put umayo and Ecuador, t he leaves ofDiplopt erys cabrerana, a jungle liana in t he same family as
Banist eriopsis, are added t o t he brew in lieu of t he leaves of Psychot ria. The alkaloid present in
Diplopt erys, however, is ident ical t o t hat in t he Psychot riaadmixt ures, and pharmacologically,
t he effect is similar. In Peru, various admixt ures in addit ion t oPs y c h o t r i a orDipolopt erys

are frequent ly added, depending on t he magical, medical, or religious purposes for which t he
drug is being consumed. Alt hough a virt ual pharmacopoeia of admixt ures are occasionally added,
t he most commonly employed admixt ures (ot her t hanPs y c h o t r i a, which is a const ant component
of t he preparat ion) are various Solanaceous genera, including t obacco (Nicot iana sp.),

Brugmansiasp., and Brunf elsiasp. (Schult es, 19 72 ; McKenna, et al., 19 95 ). These
Solanaceous genera are known t o cont ain alkaloids, such as nicot ine, scopalamine, and at ropine,
which ef fect bot h cent ral and peripheral adrenergic and cholinergic neurot ransmission. The
int eract ions of such agent s wit h serot onergic agonist s and MAO inhibit ors are essent ially
unknown in modern medicine.
Focus of the Present Historical Perspective
The present chapt er present s a brief overview of t he hist ory of et hnopharmacological
invest igat ions of ayahuasca, which has been a t opic of fascinat ion t o et hnographers, bot anist s,
chemist s, and pharmacologist s ever since it first became known t o science in t he mid-19t h
2

cent ury. For exposit ory purposes, t he hist ory of ayahuasca et hnopharmacology can be divided int o several segment s, st art ing wit h t he prehist orical orgins of t he beverage and leading up t o t he present , where ayahuasca is st ill an act ive area of research. The modern hist ory of

ayahuasca can be dat ed from t he mid-19t h cent ury. The focus of t he present chapt er is on t he
et hnopharmacologic hist ory of ayahuasca, t hough it should be not ed t hat t his unique beverage has

hist orically impact ed religion, polit ics, and societ y, as well as science, (e.g., in t he Brazilian goverment \u2019s accept ance of t he legit imacy of t he sacrament al use of ayahuasca beverages by t he UDV and ot her Brasilian syncret ic sect s) and t he implicat ions and consequences of it s cont inued and spreading use is likely t o be felt on a number of levels now and in t he fut ure.

Prehistorical Roots of Ayahuasca

The origins of t he use of ayahuasca in t he Amazon Basin are lost in t he mist s of prehist ory. No one can say for cert ain where t he pract ice may have originat ed, and about all t hat can be st at ed wit h cert aint y is t hat it was already spread among numerous indigenous t ribes t hroughout t he Amazon Basin by t he t ime ayahuasca came t o t he at t ent ion of West ern et hnographers in t he mid- 19t h cent ury. This fact alone argues for it s ant iquit y; beyond t hat , lit t le is known. Plut arco Naranjo, t he Equat orian et hnograper, has summarized what lit t le informat ion is available on

t he prehist ory of ayahuasca (Naranjo, 19 79 , 19 86 ). There is abundant archeological evidence,
in t he form of pot t ery vessels, ant hropomorphic figurines, snuffing t rays and t ubes, et c., t hat
plant hallucinogen use was well est ablished in t he Ecuadorian Amazon by 15 00 - 20 00 B.C.
Unfort unat ely, most of t he specific evidence, in t he form of veget able powders, snuff t rays, and
pipes, is relat ed t o t he use of psychoact ive plant s ot her t han ayahuaca, such as coca, t obacco, and

t he hallucinogenic snuff derived from Anadenant hera species and known as vilka and various ot her names. There is not hing in t he form of iconographic mat erials or preserved bot anical remains t hat would unequivocally est ablish t he prehist orical use of ayahuasca, alt hough it is probable t hat t hese pre-Colombian cult ures, sophist icat ed as t hey were in t he use of a variet y

of psychot ropic plant s, were also familiar wit h ayahuasca and it s preparat ion. The lack of dat a
is frust rat ing, however, part icularly in respect t o a quest ion which has fascinat ed
et hnopharmacologist s since t he lat e 19 60 \u2019s when it s import ance was first brought t o light
t hrough t he work of R.E. Schult es and his st udent s. As ment ioned above, ayahuasca is unique

among plant hallucinogens in t hat it is prepared from a combinat ion of t wo plant s: The bark or st ems of Banist eriopsis species, t oget her wit h t he leaves of Psychot ria species or ot her DMT- cont aining admixt ures. The beverage depends on t his unique combinat ion for it s act ivit y. There seems small likelihood of \u201c accident ally\u201d combining t he t wo plant s t o obt ain an act ive

preparat ion when neit her is part icularly act ive alone, yet we know t hat at some point in
prehist ory, t his fort uit ous combinat ion was discovered. At t hat point , ayahuasca was
\u201c invent ed.\u201d Just how t his discovery was made, and who was responsible, we may never know,

t hough t here are several charming myt hs which address t he t opic. Mest izo ayahuasqueros in Peru will, t o t his day, t ell you t hat t his knowledge comes direct ly from t he \u201c plant t eachers\u201d (Luna, 1984), while t he mest res of t he Brasilian syncret ic cult , t he UDV, will t ell you wit h equal convict ion that the knowledge came from \u201cthe first scientist,\u201d King Solomon, who

impart ed t he t echnology t o t he Inca king during a lit t le publicized visit t o t he New World in ant iquit y. In t he absence of dat a, t hese explanat ions are all t hat we have. All t hat we can say wit h confidence is t hat t he knowledge of t he t echniques for preparing ayahuasca, including

knowledge of t he appropriat e admixt ure plant s, had diffused t hroughout t he Amazon by t he t ime
t he use of ayahuasca came t o t he at t ent ion of any modern researcher.
Scientific \u201cdiscovery\u201d of Ayahuasca - the 19th Century
The archeological prehist ory of ayahuasca is likely t o remain inext ricably bound up wit h it s
myt hical origins for t he rest of t ime, unless some art ifact should be uncovered t hat would
unequivocally est ablish t he ant iquit y of it s usage.
3

By cont rast , what might be called t he modern or t he scient ific hist ory of ayahuasca, is t raceable
t o 1851, when t he great English bot anist Richard Spruce encount ered t he use of an int oxicat ing
beverage among t he Tukano Indians of t he Rio Uapes in Brasil (Schult es, 19 82 ). Spruce
collect ed flowering specimens from t he large jungle liana used as t he source of t he beverage, and
t his collect ion was t he basis for his classificat ion of t he plant as Banist eria caapi; it was
reclassified as Banist eriopsis caapi by t he t axonomist Mort on in 19 31 as part of his revision of

t he generic concept s wit hin t he family, Malpighiaceae.

Seven years lat er, Spruce again encount ered t he same liana in use among t he Guahibo Indians on t he upper Orinoco of Colombia and Venezuela, and, lat er t he same year, found t he Z\u00e1paro Indians of Andean Peru t aking a narcot ic beverage, prepared from t he same plant , which t hey called

ayahuasca. Alt hough Spruce\u2019s discovery predat es any ot her published account s, he did not
publish his findings unt il 18 73 , when it was ment ioned in a popular account of his Amazon
explorat ions (Spruce, 18 73 ). A fuller exposit ion was not t o appear unt il Spruce published his
account in A.R. Wallace\u2019s ant hology in 1908, Not es of a Bot anist on t he Amazon and Andes

(Spruce, 19 08 ). Credit for t he earliest published report s of ayahuasca usage belongs t o t he Ecuadorian geographer Manuel Villavicencio, who, in 18 58 , wrot e of t he use of ayahuasca in sorcery and divinat ion on t he upper Rio Napo (Villavicencio, 18 58 ). Alt hough Villavicencio supplied no bot anical det ails about t he plant used as t he source of t he beverage, his account of

his own self-int oxicat ion lef t no doubt in Spruce\u2019s mind t hat t hey were writ ing about t he same
t hing.
Throughout t he remainder of t he 19 t h cent ury, various et hnographers and explorers cont inued
t o report on t heir encount ers of t he use of an int oxicat ing beverage prepared by various

indigenous Amazonian t ribes, and purport edly prepared from t he \u201c root s\u201d (Cr\u00e9vaux, 18 83 ), of various \u201cshrubs\u201d (Koch-Gr\u00fcnberg, 1909) or \u201clianas\u201d (Rivet, 1905) of uncertain botanical provenance. Unlike Spruce, who had t he presence of mind not only t o collect bot anical voucher specimens, but also mat erials designat ed for event ual chemical analysis, t hese lat er

invest igat ors did not collect specimens of t he plant s t hey observed, and hence t heir account s are
now of lit t le more t han hist orical import ance. One not able except ion was Simson\u2019s (18 86 )
publicat ion of t he use of ayahusca amongst Ecuadorian Indians, not ing t hat t hey \u201cdrank
ayahuasca mixed wit h yage, sameruja leaves, and guant o wood, an indulgence which usually

result s in a broil bet ween at least t he part akers of t he beverage.\u201d None of t he ingredient s were ident ified, nor were voucher specimens collect ed, but t his report is t he earliest indicat ion t hat ot her admixt ure species were employed in t he preparat ion of ayahuasca.

While Richard Spruce and ot her advent urous Amazonian explorers were collect ing t he first field
report s of ayahuasca from 18 51 onward, t he groundwork was already being laid for import ant
work on t he chemist ry of ayahuasca t hat would t ake place in t he second decade of t he t went iet h
century. The 19 th century witnessed the birth of natural products chemistry, starting with the
isolat ion of morphine from opium poppies by t he German pharmacist S\u00ebrt uner in 1803. A

disproport ionat e number of nat ural product s isolat ed for t he first t ime during t his period were alkaloids, probably because t hese bases are relat ively easy t o isolat e in a pure form, and part ly because t he plant s which cont ain t hem were and are import ant drug plant s wit h obvious and

of t en dramat ic pharmacological propert ies. It was during t his period of feverish alkaloid
discovery t hat German chemist H. G\u00f6bel isolat ed harmaline from t he seeds of t he Syrian Rue,

Peganum harmala. Six years lat er, his colleague, J. Frit sch isolat ed harmine from t he seeds in 18 47 . More t han 50 years lat er, a t hird alkaloid, harmalol, was also isolat ed from Syrian Rue seeds by Fisher in 19 01 . Harmine, like t he ot her \u00df-carbolines named aft er t he species epit het of Peganum harmala, would lat er t urn out t o be ident ical t o t he major \u00df-carboline found in

Banist eriopsis caapi; t he definit ive est ablishment of t he equivalence of t he ayahuasca \u00df-
carboline t o harmine from Syrian Rue however, would not t ake place unt il t he 19 20 s, aft er
harmine had been independent ly isolat ed by several invest igat ors and given a variet y of names.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...