Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Reply Brief: Authors Guild v. Google (Appeal)

Reply Brief: Authors Guild v. Google (Appeal)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 719|Likes:
Published by LJ's infoDOCKET
March 6, 2013
March 6, 2013

More info:

Published by: LJ's infoDOCKET on Mar 08, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/24/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
12-3200
U
NITED
S
TATES
C
OURT OF
A
PPEALS
 
FOR THE
S
ECOND
C
IRCUIT
 
T
HE
A
UTHORS
G
UILD
,
 
I
 NC
.,
 
Associational Plaintiff, B
ETTY
M
ILES
,
 
J
OSEPH
G
OULDEN
, and J
IM
B
OUTON
,
 
individually andon behalf of all others similarly situated,
 Plaintiffs-Appellees
,
v.
G
OOGLE
I
 NC
.,
 Defendant-Appellant 
.On Appeal from an Order Granting Certification of a Class Action, Entered onMay 31, 2012, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of NewYork, No. 1:05-cv-08136-DC Before the Honorable Denny Chin
REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT
D
ARALYN
J.
 
D
URIE
 J
OSEPH
C.
 
G
RATZ
 D
URIE
T
ANGRI
LLP217 Leidesdorff StreetSan Francisco, CA 94111(415) 362-6666S
ETH
P.
 
W
AXMAN
 L
OUIS
R.
 
C
OHEN
 
ANDOLPH
D.
 
M
OSS
 D
ANIEL
P.
 
EARNEY
,
 
J
.A
RI
H
OLTZBLATT
 W
ILMER 
C
UTLER 
P
ICKERING
 H
ALE AND
D
ORR LLP
 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20006(202) 663-6000March 6, 2013
Case: 12-3200 Document: 145 Page: 1 03/06/2013 866932 36
 
 
- i -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PageTABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... iiI. P
LAINTIFFS
C
ANNOT
D
EMONSTRATE
A
DEQUACY
U
 NDER 
ULE
23(a) ............. 2II. G
OOGLE
S
F
AIR 
U
SE
D
EFENSE
AISES
I
 NDIVIDUAL
I
SSUES
T
HAT
D
EFEAT
P
REDOMINANCE
U
 NDER 
ULE
23(b)(3) ............................................ 14III. P
ROOF
O
F
C
OPYRIGHT
O
WNERSHIP
A
 ND
T
IMELY
EGISTRATION
W
ILL
P
RESENT
A
DDITIONAL
I
 NDIVIDUAL
I
SSUES
T
HAT
W
EIGH
A
GAINST
P
REDOMINANCE
............................................................................... 21CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 27CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCECERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILINGCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case: 12-3200 Document: 145 Page: 2 03/06/2013 866932 36
 
 
- ii -
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESCASES
Page(s)
 Bieneman v. City of Chicago
, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir. 1988) ................................. 3, 4
Cambridge University Press v. Becker 
, 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga.2012) .............................................................................................................. 14
Crasto v. Kaskel’s Estate
, 63 F.R.D. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1974) ....................................... 21
 Dunnigan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
, 214 F.R.D. 125 (S.D.N.Y.2003) .............................................................................................................. 26
 Erhardt v. Prudential Group, Inc.
, 629 F.2d 843 (2d Cir. 1980) ............................ 11
 Fogarazzo v. Lehman Brothers
, 263 F.R.D. 90 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ........................... 26
 Freeland v. AT&T 
, 238 F.R.D. 130 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ................................................ 6
 Hampton Hardware, Inc. v. Cotter & Co.
, 156 F.R.D. 630 (N.D. Tex.1994) .............................................................................................................. 11
 In re Fedex Ground Package Systems, Employment Practices Litigation
,2007 WL 3027405 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 15 2007) .................................................. 9
 In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation
, 574 F.2d 662 (2d Cir.1978) ........................................................................................................ 25, 26
 In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
, 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir.2006) ........................................................................................................ 21, 27
 In re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation
, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11498(N.D. Cal. May 31, 2005) .............................................................................. 27
 In re
 
OSB Antitrust Litigation
,
 
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56617 (E.D. Pa.Aug. 3, 2007) ................................................................................................. 24
 In re School Asbestos Litigation
, 842 F.2d 671 (3d Cir. 1988) ............................... 12
 In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
, 267 F.R.D. 583 (N.D.Cal. 2010) ...................................................................................................... 24
Case: 12-3200 Document: 145 Page: 3 03/06/2013 866932 36

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->