• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Improving Communication
Example
The Salesperson andPlanner Clash
Click thislink to buy a video pod cast lesson on line for this process described in this iPaper.Improving Communication - Using the TOC Cloud Thinking Process
Goldratt-TOC Ltd
© John Tripp 1994 - 2009
T
441764679756
 
www.goldratt-toc.com
 
Goldratt-TOC Ltd
I don’t knowwho will win but itwon’t be me evenif I do!
 
Improving Communication
The Salesperson and The Planner Clash
Phil is sitting studying the order book when the phone rings. He picks it up and listens as Simon from the Sales departmententhusiastically informs him, “I’ve just won a big order. Its important you get it in the plan for me this morning Phil. I’vepromised this customer we will deliver by the end of the month.”Phil hears the energy in Simon’s voice but is troubled. This months plan is already at capacity and then some. Production isstretched to fulfil all the orders already in the book including an order placed several months ago for one of the company’sbest customers.“Now, hang on Simon,” Phil says firmly, “That is not going to happen. The book for this month is closed. We are nowoverloaded for your product area. We are absolutely full.”“No way Phil. I cannot accept that. This is vital,” says Simon urgently. I have already made a commitment to the customerand it makes my numbers for this month.”Phil briefly glances down at the confirmatory figures on the page in front of him before responding, “I’m sorry Simon, but Ireally do have to consider all our customers and also all the other guys in your department who have already placed ordersthat we have promised to meet. You will have to go back to the customer and tell him the delivery date will have to bepostponed. We probably won’t even have the material needed for what you’ve promised – you know the rules. You shouldhave checked with us before making the commitment.”Simon, incensed and worried that Phil’s response could lose him this big sale, says, “Phil this is rubbish – you know thescore. We have a very hard job winning orders as it is. I am going to call Alan, now, and I am sure that when you twospeak, you will give him a different answer.” The line goes dead. Phil knows this could get difficult as Alan is the salesdirector whilst he is only a lowly planner.Simon slams down the phone with every intention of calling Alan. However, on calling Alan’s secretary he learns that Alan isout for the rest of the day. His first response blocked, Simon considers the situation and begins to feel uneasy about theend of the meeting with Phil. If he had succeeded just now in saying what he originally planned to Alan, he might now beregretting it. He had after all broken a rule imposed by Alan. He should never have promised the customer a delivery withouttalking to Phil first. He was just so keen to win this new customer and if he was honest keen to meet his sales target.On that note Simon realises too that if he wants to meet future sales targets he need Phil’s support. He is not going aboutsecuring Phil’s support in a very clever fashion.Simon begins to see he has created quite a storm but he is also aware he needs the new sale in this months plan – he is inbetween a rock and a hard place. Sitting not decided what to do he recalls a training session he was involved with recentlywhere they presented a process for dealing with disagreements and negotiations. He looks through his desk, finds the handout he was given, and reads it to see what it has to offer. After a little study Simon feels the process could be worth a try – he has already taken step one of the process which is tostop the discussion.Goldratt-TOC LtdHow To Win Arguments
 Tuesday, 20 January 2009 © John Tripp 1994 - 2009
page 1 of 5
 
Simon thinks to himself, “I suppose slamming the phone down counts as stopping the discussion.” The process described starts off with a remarkable analysis of the situation. It is almost as though the person doing theanalysis was in the room with him and Phil. Phil was being obnoxious, illogical and stubborn. Could Phil have been thinking Iwas obnoxious, illogical and stubborn too? thinks Simon. If the process is to be believed he was. The process goes on to suggest a method of analysing the disagreement that should lead to a better outcome than I or Philcan expect. I just have to answer five questions, which areQuestion 1: What do I want ? The answer is easy – I want my new order in the plan now.Question 2 : What does Phil want? Well that is easy too. Not to put my new order in the plan now.Question 3 : Why do I want my order in the plan now in other words, what is my need? That is a little more tricky – maybeits to satisfy my new customer? No – I think really I need it to make my sales numbers for this month.Question 4 : What does Phil need - why is he refusing to put my order in the plan now? Well I do remember him saying –there is no room in the plan as all the production slots are full – if he put another order in it would damage the plan – make alot of the orders difficult to deliver on time – I do not see how one new order can do that but what he must be saying is heneeds to produce a realistic plan for production so that existing promises can be achieved.Question 5 : What is our common objective ? Based on that meeting I am not sure that we have one ! Phil was prettyinflexible and seemed to have no interest in me achieving my objective. I have to make my targets so that the companymeets its sales budget. That must be very important. And Phil needs to meet his objective, and his objective must be: toenable production to meet the promises we all make to customers. So I think the bet way to express our common goal isusing the phrase : to work together to achieve both our targets. So now what does that look like….Let me just fill in the template with my answers…Work together effectivelyto achieve both our targets Add my new order to theplan nowNot to add your new orderto the plan now Achieve my sales targetCreate a plan highly likelyto meet commitments tocustomers12345Simon reviews his analysis. He checks where he is in the process from the notes and sees now he should be looking at theassumptions on his side between boxes B and D. Simon is not happy as it seems that he may have to give up his “want” ashe cannot guarantee that Phil will agree to change his side. The process says review the assumptions to check whether anyassumptions are incorrect, or whether any assumptions can be changed so that his need B [ achieve my sales target ] isachieved even without D [ adding my new order to the plan now ].OK what Assumptions?Goldratt-TOC LtdHow To Win Arguments
 Tuesday, 20 January 2009 © John Tripp 1994 - 2009
page 2 of 5
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...