• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Lara Johnstone
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529Tel: (044) 870 7239 || Cell: (071) 170 1954
10 June 2008
Adv. Anton AckermanRef: HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04 NPA: Priority Crimes Litigation UnitPages: 5 + Encl: 9c/o:NPA: Dir. Spec. Ops. Econ. Off. (DSOSEO)Tel: (012) 845 6422 \ 6758 || Fax: (012) 845 7130c/o Adv. Milton De La HarpeCC:»Malcolm Gezzler, Inc.: HE Hon. Consul. Malcolm Gezzler; c/o Adv. Gary Beale»NPA: Capetown Prosecutors Office: Snr. Prosecutor Jacobs; c/o Adv. Gary Beale»Capetown Magistrates’ Court: Magistrate Tulu; c/o Adv. Milton De La Harpe»ID Leader: Hon. Mrs. Patricia De Lille, MP; c/o Adv. Gary Beale»Lawyers for Human Rights, Law Society of South Africa and Black Lawyers Association»Advocates: Gary Beale, Milton De La Harpe, Pete Mihalik, Jaap Cilliers and Tokkie van Zyl»US Embassy, Pretoria: Mr. Donald Teitelbaum»USA Homeland Security, Johannesburg: Ms. Lori PietropauliAdvocate Ackerman
Re: JAG 07-146, ICJ-JAG 07-146, STARH and BBB Counsel and SpokespersonOfficial Resignation, effective 11 June 2008.
Briefly For the Record:
1.
Should HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04 have been placed on the roll for hearing in the High Court, it presented not only the South African judiciary, but in fact the entire South African legal establishment,from police, to prosecutors, judges, and lawyers the opportunity to confirm their commitment to theSouth African Bill of Rights and Constitution, and to educate and raise the awareness of particularly theThird World on overpopulation policy issues; by (i) humanely disclosing the reasons for the manmadeorigins of AIDS, as a biological warfare depopulation virus; (ii) education on population policy issues:Overpopulation Prevention: Education and Role of Women: A population policy is the foundation uponwhich all other long or short-term planning policies are built. It can be humane, based on loving pro-creation, producing a humane low or negative birth and death rate; or it can be inhumane, based onhateful pro-creation, producing an inhumane high birth and death rate. High birth rate population policies exacerbate all the socio-economic conditions that are generally considered detrimental to astable society: crime, racism, xenophobia, patriarchy, violence, unemployment, illiteracy, poverty, and inan international context: resource wars, terrorism, refugee issues, etc. For example, 19 out of every 20 babies born every day, are born in the Third World; For every three years of education that a womanreceives, she has one less child. The main determining factor in any society contributing to a moreloving low birth rate population policy is the role and status of women, and the education they receive, particularly in terms of family planning, population issues, and civil rights issues; and (iii) informing andeducating people on universal mental health care issues, namely Free Speech and PsychologicalIntegrity issues: psychological theories of mens rea, actus reus, sanity and insanity definitions and therole of psychological definitions as a form of manipulation and control of dissent and alternativeopinions.
2.
I have not had the opportunity to discuss with any privately practicing or State Attorney or Advocate in
 
South Africa the issue of Promis software, and what it can do. It was software originally designed for US State and District Attorney’s offices; to coordinate cases between all District Attorney’s offices inthe fifty United States. It was later allegedly stolen and modified to do much, much more. It hasfunctionality that allows anyone with such software to access information on for example, your or mycomputer, including computers without modems, not connected to the internet. Accordingly any NPAProsecutorial office with Promis software could access the evidentiary documentation or correspondence of any defendant’s case, or their Attorney or Advocate’s correspondence, strategy,evidentiary documentation, etc.
3.
In my case, the US Navy Judge Advocate General’s Office in Washington, DC monitor and have accessto every single letter I write, on the biological warfare of AIDS issue in real time; i.e. immediately.Whenever I refer to US Navy JAG, or have acted as JAG 07-146 or ICJ-JAG 07-146 Counsel or Spokesperson, and they had any legal objection to the content I included in any facsimile, letter or sms;then they have my permission to technologically interrupt or stop the transmission of thecommunication from being sent from my computer, or cellphone, to any recipient. I granted that permission to the US Navy Judge Advocate General’s office, when I transferred HC-CPD Appeal toJAG. I never gave the NPA or the SAPS, permission to monitor my correspondence using Promis or any other such software, although it would be extremely difficult for me to conclude, that they are notdoing so, and have not been doing so, since at least 2006. In short, where any prosecutorial authorityuses such software by spying on an accused’s correspondence, strategy and legally privilegedcommunications, without permission; it makes a mockery of the law, not to mention the justice system,reducing the justice system to a literal kangaroo court justice system. HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04 Headsof Argument contains evidentiary documentation, namely news media publications investigationsreferring to Promis, particularly the Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s efforts to investigate Promissoftware abuses.
4.
In documentation dated 07/07/2007, I filed a withdrawal of HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04, with writtenreasons, including among others, the NPA and HC-CPD’s refusal to place the Appeal on the roll for hearing, and the NPA’s refusal to inform me of the name of the Advocate at NPA-WC, dealing with theAppeal. The NPA have refused to give me the Appeal information, because they say I am not anAttorney, and am not allowed to be given the name of Advocates at the NPA, dealing with the Appeal;and accordingly they and the HC-CPD refused to place the Appeal on the roll for hearing in the HC-CPD.
5.
As the evidentiary documentation as to the biological warfare origins of AIDS, submitted into the HC-CPD Appeal record, is effectively United States Government property (submitted into the court recordwith US Government permission, as provided by USAID USMC Sgt. Peter Hubbard on among others,in a face-to-face in person emergency meeting at the US Embassy, on 04 August 2002), I transferredthe HC-CPD Appeal, for record and monitoring purposes, among others, to the US Navy JudgeAdvocate General’s Office, Washington, DC; effective on 18 July 2007.
6.
On 18 July 2007, I was arrested by SAPS Inspector Christian -- on two alleged outstanding warrants,allegedly in Port Elizabeth and Pietermaritzburg, which to this day the SAPS have refused to submitinto the crimen inuria Further Particulars or Charge Sheet, plausibly because they do not exist -- as aresult of a complaint by Hon. Mrs. Patricia de Lille, MP, alleging crimen inuria by myself against her.
7.
On 02 June 2008, Magistrate Tulu struck the crimen inuria matter from the Magistrate’s Court’s roll,due to the SAPS alleged ‘backlog’ to provide their full investigation into the crimen inuria matter. This being over 10 months after the SAPS considered their evidence for the crimen inuria matter sufficientto arrest and detain me for 35 days without a bail hearing. Prior to Magistrate Tulu striking the crimeninuria matter from the role, he made quite an effort to clarify to the Prosecutor that allegedly he wasunsure what the NPA meant by ‘backlog’; and to ask for the exact date that it had been logged by theSAP and NPA; and to repeat that it had been logged on the 28
th
of May. Subsequent to him striking the
 
matter from the roll, he declared a tea break. Of course, a backlog of cases would in conventional termsmean, the consequences of patriarchal hateful procreation population policy, producing a high birth rateand high death rate.
8.
Promis Software and Masonry ‘tea’ communications: In terms of the darker side of Masonry ‘tea’represents ‘eat’, although that may not have been Magistrate Tulu’s intended representation. ThePromise coincidence being: In a confidential legally privileged letter dated 28
th
May 2008, to AdvocateDe La Harpe, I stated among others the following: “look over the letter I sent to -------, after hissecretary told me she did not know what he meant by an “irresistible urge” in point six, of his letter. No,I am not offended, by his irresistible urge, I just don’t like him threatening me with the police about his‘irresistible urge’. A gentlemans way to deal therewith is to invite you to dinner, or something like that,not threaten you with the police! I’m not a pig, nor if I was, do I have any, nor do I want any, childrento eat. Although its possible he had other meanings. Anyway, just so you know.” Only Magistrate Tuluknows whether he was inviting me to dinner to remain silent and ‘eat’ the consequence of patriarchalhateful procreation population policies, namely to get sexual enjoyment from the suffering and death of millions of Africans dying from AIDS. He certainly may not have intended his tea break as such,however those favouring the darker side of Masonry -- whom I do not represent and certainly have notrepresented since 11 June 2001, and subsequent thereto, quite the opposite in fact -- certainly couldhave interpreted his conduct as a representation to that effect.
9.
Prior to the matter being struck from the roll by Magistrate Tulu: I repeatedly in a verbal face to face in person meeting, and in writing, instructed my then Attorney Malcolm Gezzler, to contact the NPA:Advocate Anton Ackerman, to make the following offer to the NPA:In exchange for the State showing an act of goodwill to the concepts of Law and Order and therule of law, by (1) dropping the crimen inuria charges, and (2) paying for Advocates Jaap Cilliers,Tokkie van Zyl, Pete Mihalik, Gary Beal and Milton De La Harpe to represent me in the HC-CPDAppeal matter – considering the issues raised therein, and the State’s negligent and previousobstruction of justice etc. conduct in the trial and subsequent Appeal documentation filed – I wouldwithdraw the transfer of the HC-CPD Appeal to JAG, and the Appeal could proceed in the HC-CPD.I was informed by Attorney Gezzler that the State, i.e. NPA, had declined the offer, although he has sofar refused to inform me, whom he allegedly contacted at the NPA, to negotiate the offer.
10.
Subsequent thereto, on 28 May, I instructed Advocate De La Harpe to contact the NPA-WC, to findout the name of the Advocate at the NPA-WC in charge of dealing with the HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04; and to ask the particular NPA Advocate, what the NPA’s official status was on it. The crimen inuriamatter was struck from the roll by Magistrate Tulu on 02 June, prior to Adv. De La Harpe contactingthe NPA-WC, on the Appeal matter.
11.
In my Sunday, 04 August 2002, face-to-face in person emergency meeting at the US Embassy, withUSAID USMC Sgt. Peter Hubbard, I apologised for bothering him with my emergency request callout over the weekend, and simply informed him in a soft-spoken voice, politely and respectfully that Ihad a request that I needed his help with. He escorted me to an interview office in the Embassy. Helistened, and requested to see any relevant documentation, which he read. He asked questions which Ianswered, and he made a decision. Then he picked up the telephone in my presence to inform therelevant individual of his decision. Subsequent to our meeting he informed me of his personal opinionon the issues raised, and the greater objective of the issues raised, including his opinion of me and myefforts towards those issues. They were definitely not pejorative, nor did he consider the disclosure of AIDS biological warfare origins, and the population policy issue causes thereof, a joke, or my efforts, a pathetic delusion.
12.
The patriarchal hilarity of high birth and death rate suffering: Without a doubt, USMC Sgt. Hubbard
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...