near important people who would calculate and study domestic art and warcentred on loyalty to family within a caste system. Over time, spies traveled andoperated independently of their loyalty-owner families but were groomed forsecret forms of leverage and to do what was necessary to respond to enemies of the ruling class.It is quite likely that to support war, order, and authority, spies and powerfulfamilies were given access to tunnels and buildings under the earth and groomedto protect secrets not acceptable to the general public. Sometimes looking likepolice, sometimes looking like vermin, they were raised to respect aninstitutionalized mainstream secret society with a potentially heavy admissionprice and a culture all their own. Most probably, when organized, the man-at-arms would run the spy dungeons and force the work, while the clergy wouldeducate the spies through the control of religious information in support of a Godgiven right to rule over the domestic population unified by a family of Kings andcousins. In general, a royal monarchy spy loyalty system was created that overtime became a secret society of soldier-slaves who organized dungeon warfareand exercised secret power to defeat enemies of the ruling class and support royalsuccession prior to the end of the dark ages. After that time, citizens trained in war, politics, and theology, were probably responsible for the expansion of thesesystems under the pretence of maintaining order and control of local cities andtowns. In early and then late medieval times, spy dungeons were quite likely placed under the earth or in secret buildings by wealthy people in almost every European city serious about managing power on behalf of state and religiouspower systems loyal to God, Christ, and King. With the appearance of acontinuous dungeon culture, the powerful people of Europe re-invented anorganization of soldier-slaves not seen since the Greek City State, an organizationthat has been in a state of continuous use and disposal ever since. Ironically, it would be the very existence of dungeon culture and the pressure to avoid threatsassociated with the secret use of power that would set the limits and growth of such a system.From the thirteenth century to the sixteenth century, there are depictions of “dungeon culture” organized out in the open in Europe near fields of rich villasand palaces as represented in paintings of their time. A certain percentage of thespy population was likely born and raised entirely within a dungeonenvironment, kept ignorant of political and economic considerations, and used to weed out enemies within the domestic population of local and foreign countries.The images appear to represent domestic power, families, and ignorant peoplekilling the less fortunate in wealthy settings near villa’s, courtyards, andfarmland. Whether they had failed to control the use of spies or let power escapethe dungeon, their failure was responsible for paintings that were not afraid of depicting cycles of torture against peasant populations as part of a rural domesticscene. Rooted in the resentment of being born a slave, spies would likely supportthe reverse belief that torture and power were normal expressions of maintaining wealth and power and not be against killing people to earn respect for the form of power they wielded, against friends and enemies alike. As absolute power
Leave a Comment