Send this message with this seal to the next kingdom and should my letter be

opened kill the spy. Should word of my strategy leak out within the spy world
and my invention be turned against me then send in the national guard and call
this situation a state secret.

History of British Colonial Power

Over 1000 years ago King Harold claimed to rule Britain under authority given
him by Jesus Christ and God himself. Before this time, England was beset by
problems associated with lawless societies and the need to protect the population
from wandering nomads and Vikings. Plagued by insurrection and eventual
defeat, the claims of King Harold were copied by Kings of England for many
generations in support of sovereign claims designed to achieve superior force de
ma jure and establish control over the Kingdom of England. In 1066, William the
Conqueror usurped Harold’s claims of divine right and began stable and
continuous conquest to protect people from foreign invasion and the cruelties of
war through the sanction of personal military and spy institutions. Much is said
about the history of military intervention in the history of western democratic
nation states but little is published about the use and disposal of spies, an
important intergenerational group of people who were of great historical
importance to the function and maintenance of western power and religious
systems.

What follows is a speculative account of the history of secret power systems that
originated within western democratic territorial states, a story for which no
factual contradiction exists. The use of hidden power systems has long had a
history of being in our community and includes links to present day intelligence.
Over 1000 years ago, spies began a continuous and intergenerational conquest to
organize under military principles on behalf of powerful families who claimed
religious authority and divine right. Originally conceived as soldier-slaves, spies
were raised to be loyal, perform secret work, influence the general population,
and support the various policies and positions of the royal family, including the
right of succession as set up in Britain after King Harold in 1066.

During early and late medieval times, serious people quite likely began breeding
spies to perform obligations on behalf of royal families who organized to defend
territorial authority and sovereignty. Before the advent of reading and print, spies
were used to control various problems associated with ruling over a large mass of
people. Toward this end, a large group of intergenerational spies were raised to
defend other people and to populate the more remote or less habitable areas of
the Kingdom, to protect powerful church and state organizations newly designed,
and to improve and maintain stable groups that could intergenerationally survive
sudden invasion or attack on their own. Motivated by the pressure of existence,
the family groups were raised willing to die and they were generally under the
direction or control of intelligence spies raised loyal to people who more than
likely spent an entire lifetime surrounded by hidden forms of power within the
emerging monarchy state system, they were born to take a place near important
people involved in state or religious secrets and probably kept dumb about
everything except the exercise of secret power and the interpersonal
consequences of non-conformity, they were not recruited, but born into a servant
class. Linked to royal forms of monarchy government, spies were viewed as a
class of lower-class people, privy to the secrets of power, and set up to live near
important people organized under the divine right of Kings. They provided a
serious interpersonal option for those trained in military and secret arts on the
basis of an expectation to perform dangerous work and control space.

In later or more formal times, conventions existed that raised spies both in and
out of public life, but mostly raised in secret and kept apart from other people.
They were given the role of occupying the lower classes and spontaneously
defending territory against unexpected invaders, foreign agitation, and upstart
loyalists all performed under the pretence of protecting life and property.
Powerful families encouraged each other to groom spies to maintain order and
engage in the suppression of local or foreign populations as a matter of course,
with or without them knowing. It was not always necessary for a spy to survive, as
their use value was in being disposable, but it was generally necessary for the spy
family to survive and become a percentage of the general population, and to
produce people capable of secretly weeding out dissenters, enemies, and
rebellious free citizens alike. They were expected to spontaneously perform work
when the army was someplace else in order to maintain control and safety for the
ruling class in times of trouble and without fail despite their lower class position
and disposable role.

As they were not connected to the army but to powerful families who thought
them useful as insurance against conflict and revolt, spies were used to further a
military policy when the army was not viewed as the legitimate vehicle for
control. In comparison with free soldiers who were raised as sons of an
enlightened educated ruling class, spies were considered useful if they remained
poor and performed hidden acts of leverage against friends and enemies alike.
Raised without public origin, family, or occupation, they were trained to use
intelligence in war, control information, and perform acts of leverage that would
ensure obligations and agreements between powerful and important people.
Families with access to spies could send secret messages to subordinates within a
hierarchy system, distant relatives, or foreign power systems, to show each other
who was serious enough to be in charge of running a Kingdom. Sending a spy or
even killing a spy might be enough to convince others to conform to the wishes of
the ruling family.

In order to support this kind of power, shortly after the conquest of William the
Conqueror, wealthy families were encouraged to established personal authority,
within secret dungeon environments that operated without the rule of law beyond
the prison system. Given the existence of such a serious situation, a spy was
probably a person who was taught to remain ignorant about the world but to
respect and survive the rules of a force de ma jure cultural group backed up by an
underground dungeon apparatus. Serious spies could be expected to live or work
near important people who would calculate and study domestic art and war
centred on loyalty to family within a caste system. Over time, spies traveled and
operated independently of their loyalty-owner families but were groomed for
secret forms of leverage and to do what was necessary to respond to enemies of
the ruling class.

It is quite likely that to support war, order, and authority, spies and powerful
families were given access to tunnels and buildings under the earth and groomed
to protect secrets not acceptable to the general public. Sometimes looking like
police, sometimes looking like vermin, they were raised to respect an
institutionalized mainstream secret society with a potentially heavy admission
price and a culture all their own. Most probably, when organized, the man-at-
arms would run the spy dungeons and force the work, while the clergy would
educate the spies through the control of religious information in support of a God
given right to rule over the domestic population unified by a family of Kings and
cousins. In general, a royal monarchy spy loyalty system was created that over
time became a secret society of soldier-slaves who organized dungeon warfare
and exercised secret power to defeat enemies of the ruling class and support royal
succession prior to the end of the dark ages. After that time, citizens trained in
war, politics, and theology, were probably responsible for the expansion of these
systems under the pretence of maintaining order and control of local cities and
towns. In early and then late medieval times, spy dungeons were quite likely
placed under the earth or in secret buildings by wealthy people in almost every
European city serious about managing power on behalf of state and religious
power systems loyal to God, Christ, and King. With the appearance of a
continuous dungeon culture, the powerful people of Europe re-invented an
organization of soldier-slaves not seen since the Greek City State, an organization
that has been in a state of continuous use and disposal ever since. Ironically, it
would be the very existence of dungeon culture and the pressure to avoid threats
associated with the secret use of power that would set the limits and growth of
such a system.

From the thirteenth century to the sixteenth century, there are depictions of
“dungeon culture” organized out in the open in Europe near fields of rich villas
and palaces as represented in paintings of their time. A certain percentage of the
spy population was likely born and raised entirely within a dungeon
environment, kept ignorant of political and economic considerations, and used to
weed out enemies within the domestic population of local and foreign countries.
The images appear to represent domestic power, families, and ignorant people
killing the less fortunate in wealthy settings near villa’s, courtyards, and
farmland. Whether they had failed to control the use of spies or let power escape
the dungeon, their failure was responsible for paintings that were not afraid of
depicting cycles of torture against peasant populations as part of a rural domestic
scene. Rooted in the resentment of being born a slave, spies would likely support
the reverse belief that torture and power were normal expressions of maintaining
wealth and power and not be against killing people to earn respect for the form of
power they wielded, against friends and enemies alike. As absolute power
absolutely corrupts, families engaged in such a serious past-time might find
themselves in a race to protect each other from retaliation and cruelty, a race that
eventually would be driven by fear and guarantees of retaliation.

In order to achieve spies who were willing to be loyal and ignorant, it is quite
likely that some people raised the unfortunate spies with the philosophy of Plato’s
cave, watching shadows on the wall while hearing voices of instruction, imagining
puppets were real rather than illusory, and conforming to distortions of the truth
or jails designed to alter normal learning and perception. The unfettered laws of
dungeon culture and the pressure of controlling spies would lend itself to
breeding pools of perception distortion and mind control that aimed to achieve
safety of those in charge while ending at various times with the creation of
Dante’s description of hell. The pressure of working near cruelty would of itself
create the need for a dependable spy system that might consider a reinvention of
Plato’s trinity power system that involved a good charioteer and two steeds, one
steed, a noble truth seeker, and the other steed, an unruly never truth-seerer, for
command of the good charioteer, as described by Plato fifteen hundred years
earlier. The best way to achieve this idea would be to reverse information about
the truth and prevent people with perception distortions from learning belief
systems that would lead them to exist beyond the dungeon system. This would be
done, to out-compete and survive other spy families also engaged in dungeon
culture and the lawless use of cruelty. As such an enterprise was as large as a
military campaign and designed to enforce authority and loyalty on behalf of
serious and well organized people capable of breeding disposable people, all in
agreement on keeping a secret, locations and historical references to dungeons
and their results have generally been ignored, covered up, or never found, rather
we have public descriptions of political turmoil and legal jail systems that quite
likely operate in front of these other more serious systems of choice and decision.
However, the activities of domestic servants/breeding spies ready to kill, serve,
and rudely obey powerful families are well represented by paintings and portraits
of people during the French Revolution and to a lesser degree, the American
Revolution.

In the thirteenth century, Italy, the home of Rome was in charge of religious
authority and the existence of cruelty motivated a religious quest to control the
use of silent power. Religious spies travelled all of Europe on behalf of important
people who set out to create contacts and unify secret dungeon culture by
enforcing rules of conformity and authority linked to trinity power systems.
Under pressure to conform to the best moral principles, serious people would use
spies to dominate civilian populations or control power through various forms of
leverage. Spies would generally be used to protect secret family power and weed
out upstart families within the general population and to protect territory
through the use of basic force de ma jure logic and the supremacy of predictable
spy families.

Over time, these wealthy families began to create looks that matched royal family
looks of higher born, royal family people in order to infiltrate power systems of
other countries, and these matches can be seen in paintings of the time. France,
Italy, Spain, Holland, Britain, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Portugal, Russia,
Austria, Hungary, etc. and all other areas linked to the royal families of Europe
were required to have people from these families in order to survive being
famous. It is quite likely that dungeon spies were created with the same family
gene pools as royal family power systems loyal to God, Christ, or King or whoever
wielded the axe. In this manner, a large demographic spy pool grew up side by
side with royal breeding for positions of authority and power, use and war, under
wealthy estates kept top secret and conjoined by blood with powerful families, in
what would become democratic nation states organized to meet the needs of
serious people groomed in leadership and political survival, all looking like the
same family gene pool for the sake of identification and loyalty. Peace treaties
and inter-state-royal family weddings would be important affairs for people of
this time as spies would change breeding patterns based on which gene pool was
in power over time. Spies went to war or loved each other on the basis of gene
pool matches to support newly formed state power relationships linked to secret
family power and good breeding. Groomed to look like family, spies were used as
servants and used to provide an option for power to surround or replace
important people while providing an outlet for the sexual desire of the ruling
class.

Since the end of the dark ages and the beginning of the colonial expansion period,
these spy networks were used to entrench European conquest and control local
power in distant locations. In this manner, spies sent from one country to
another country would be trained to recognize spy families and out of loyalty or
fear of retaliation, not attack. Given a by-birth loyalty system, the very presence
of a spy gene pool could be used to send a direct message to one of these families.
The spies would copy the family gene pools of powerful people in charge and
know them and each other by sight. Hidden from view, breeding supremacy
trends began to favour spy gene pools only, and all territorial power gradually
consolidated under the supremacy of “legitimate” Kings of Europe whose
initiative and invention favoured the spy culture. Under such a system, changes
of royalty would be serious as the loyalty and family of the dungeon spies would
not match the ruling family gene pool.

By the fourteenth century, power reached a plateau of entrenched outward

normalcy and many royal families had already shared wealth and family to
support each other and peace with other families in other countries. Well aware
of the pressures related to the use of spies who looked like people from their
family they organized instructions to increase the skills of spy culture through the
invention of spy triads within the general population and under the earth to
protect secret power as part of their duty and perogative associated with being
the nation state or one of its constituent powerful members. The dungeon spy
system was expanded to support large underground brothels composed of family
loyalty for easy identification and conformity within a trinity or triad safety attack
system. Generally used to weed out power from other than spy families, it became
important that all members of the ruling class be associated with spy families,
regardless of nationality. In England, by the fifteenth century, portraits of
important people were created that very particularly demonstrated the gene pool
of the person being painted. By the sixteenth century the system was already
under collapse and the portraits were very carefully restyled to ensure that a
depiction of the painted person’s gene pool could not be picked out. At this time
all the great countries of Europe were at war with each other, and each feared
being tortured to death by their enemies or enemy spies. During Elizabethan
times, the legitimacy of such a system began to break down, and monarchy power
went beyond legitimate inheritance under the guise of religious warfare, i.e. Mary
Queen of Scots, and new families gained power within the monarchy system, an
influence that would increase pressure to change the breeding of spies.

After the fall of the King of England in 1650 to Cromwell, the monarch system
backed by secret family networks was replaced by parliamentary representation
and a democratic legislative legal equity framework. The spy system fell into less
and less use, but its existence was real and not accounted for in any legal sense of
the law. Hidden from view, and paranoid about detection, the royal aspect of the
spy network turned into an inheritance operating beyond the law but with a will
to continue in silence against all knowledge of their existence, convincing all
involved to obey rules of secrecy, while hiding underground secret debaucheries,
and rumours of royal mason lodges in league with Satan, death or torture, and
obscured by symbols of ancient privilege. The result of such a system is also
represented by historical information produced in the Seventeenth Century in
Spain under the organizational structure and pressures that created the Spanish
inquisition where spies in charge of dungeon culture were raised to wear dunce
caps. What kind of a secret life exists beyond the law insofar as citizens of Europe
are wearing dunce caps in the seventeenth century to maintain order in a torture
dungeon under the direction of the clergy loyal to God and Jesus Christ?
Historically, corruption of such systems would tend, over time, to create
reoccurring stages of tyranny and oppression against civilian populations,
particularly when important people caved in to the corruption of personal power
and the joy of killing and torturing the less fortunate living near or in conflict
with the power structure, such as depictions of decadence found in the history of
Transylvannia after the decline of the Austria-Hungarian Empire system.

During the time of the French Revolution, examples of torture from dungeon
people were out in the open and depictions begin to exist that portray very
ignorant, low life people in many famous paintings and caricatures near people of
power. The paintings often characterize the use of violence as being barbaric, but
it was probably just a representation of resentment from a class of seriously
oppressed dungeon people living within their normal culture. The Revolution,
fuelled by resentment of serious royal oppression, went against very specific royal
family gene pools and was carefully watched over by spies of other countries such
as England, whose gene pool families at the time would have been complicit with
underground spy triads hidden in locations where, four centuries earlier, the
most wealthy serious people built underground homes located under the earth of
what then became densely populated urban centres. The design of such a system
would have aimed for a long term stable situation to protect the health and safety
of survivors capable of achieving influence topside to maintain and surround
power, while keeping state secrets that included purging information, or
reversing truth, to motivate people to never leave dungeon areas unless
necessary, to hide out in the open, and govern the interest of royal family or royal
spy families with loyalty gene pool expressions. Oftentimes, this system would
turn against the very people such a system was created to protect, a light versus
dark, top versus bottom, royal versus dungeon, family project.

The influence and pressure of such a system would have continued to increase its
scale, limited only by information, food and health. The inheritance of royal
families continued to be an important aspect of power that was necessary to
control throughout Europe and the New World. Inclusion of the interests of royal
family people would insure the greatest care for underground people, who were
part of their family, by those who represent the loyalty culture. Reinvorgated
during Napoleon’s conquest of the civilized world, the unification of Europe
supported the creation of the last royal family hierarchy used to govern tunnel
family gene pools, by people named Bonapart, who were capable of uniting the
army and civilian populations in France while claiming to be blessed of the
highest moral principles. In fact, the conquest of Europe, unified the dungeon spy
culture and Napoleon reconstructed the ancient power system under the
international title of Emperor of Europe in Rome, supported by a King’s King
leviathan royal birth legitimacy situation built on top of a hidden pressure,
motivated never to tell, watched by serious spy people, European-Colonial empire
system, with a modern civilian military government state power licence to kill in
secret for the benefit of itself under the emerging democratic nation state system.
His attempt to remain in power did not succeed, however, and he was exiled for
the remainder of his life.