Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
ELI Matthew Chan Permanent Protective Order

ELI Matthew Chan Permanent Protective Order

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 265 |Likes:
Ellis v. Chan: Permanent Protective Order signed March 4, 2013.

Get the full story on The ELI Forums on ExtortionLetterInfo.com. #1 Anti-Trolling Discussion Forum on the Net.

Ellis v. Chan: Permanent Protective Order signed March 4, 2013.

Get the full story on The ELI Forums on ExtortionLetterInfo.com. #1 Anti-Trolling Discussion Forum on the Net.

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: ExtortionLetterInfo.com on Mar 11, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/01/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Get the Full Story on The ELI Forums onExtortionLetterInfo.com. The ELI Forums: The #1 Anti-TrollingDiscussion Forum on theInternet!
 
.,j
 
.l
Superior
Court
Docket
#
SU-13-DM-409
Reporting Party
L.as!Filst
Middiel
Suffix
Prefix
Maiden
Name of
Plaintiff/Petitioner(s)
LINDA
ELLIS
Domestic Relations
Case
Final
Disposition
Information
Fo
FILED
lh
'li
rli
County
MUSCOGEFT
Date
Disposed
-r,
r.l
i$02
I-astFirst
Middle
I.
Sufrx Prefx
PlaintifflPetitionerrs
Attorney
Name
of
Defendant/Respondent(s)
MATTIIEW CIIAN
ffi"
Defendan&/Respondent's
Attorney
D
Pro
Se
Maiden
dPro
Se
]-ast
Bar
#
Middle
I.
Suffix
l-ast
Bar #
Fist
Mddle
i.
S
fr'{
t.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tlpe
of
Disposition
(Check
all thatapply)
tr
Dismissed
Without Final Order
A.
B
Voluntary
(byparties)
B.
n
Invol@tary
&y
court)
E
Pre-Trial
Settlemetrt
tr
Judgmert
otrthe
Pleadings
tr
SurE'nary
Judgmert
B
Trial
A.
tr
Bench
Trial
B.
tr
Jury
Trial
1.
EI
Dismissal
afterjury
selected
2.
El
Settlement
during
trial
3.
E
Judgment on
Vedict
4.
E
Directed Verdict
or
INOV
1.
2.3.
tr
D
tr
a.
b.
dn
j.
rl
k.tr
l.u
Relief
Granted
(Check
all
that
appty)
Ex
Parte
Relief
Temporary
Relief
Finai
Reiief
tr
Divorce/AmulrnenVsepamte
Maintenance
tr
Yes
ENotr
Yes
BNo
Mother
Father
tr
Child Custody
Parcnting Plan?CustodialArIaDgemeIIt?
IfYes,
checkone:
tr
Joiot Custody
tr
Joint
Legal
Custody
fl
Joint
Physical
Custody
n
Sole Custodyto:
14
yearoldparental
selection?
trYes
ENo
c. E
Visitation
or Parenting
TimeApprox.
Parenting
Time
(days per
year)
Par€nting
Time
Contested?
tr
Yes
I
No
Child Support
Forms
attached?
tr Yes
D
No
L€gitimation
PatemityAlimooy
CotrteItrpt
Equitable
Division
Protective Order
dP"rsooD
Properf
tr
Finding of FamilyVioience?Adoprion
Attorneys
Fees?
If
Yes, enter
amount:to
whom:
Other
(Specify)
4.
n
Dismissed
prior
togranting
of
relief.
e.E
ttr
g.tr
h.n
i.d
A-DR1.
Was
mediation
utilized?
tr
Yes
E
No
2.
IfYes,
was
it
(check
if
applicable)
E
court
anaexed?
fl
court maadated?
3.
Binding Arbitration
Agreement
tr
Yes
tr
No
IfYes,
what
matters
weresubject:
tr
Child
Custody
U
Visitati
on
/Parenting
Time
E
PareatingPlan
 
IN
TEE
ST'PERIOR
COT'RT
STATE
OFOE.
MUSCOGEE
COT'NTY
GEORGIA
Linda Elli
s
CASE
NO.:
SU-13-DM-409
Matthew
Chan
tfl
c;
c.a'
=oI
'1^
*,J;*
oex
Fti-
og3
o:lrn
C=E
JUDGE
FRANK
J.
Jofi#ffi,
Pet
1t
i
oner;::
-i-r
l'-:
CJ
t-org
,,q
cD=
.-l
R
Fi
a
Respondent
STA]"KING
PERME}IENT
PROEECTIVE
ORDER
A hearing
was
held
on
this
matter
on
Eebruary
28,
20!3
aL
which
the
Respondent
appearedand
was
provided
with
the
opporlunityto
be
heard
and
thePetitioner
requested,
pursuant
ro
O.C.G.C.
SS
L6-5-94
(e)ard
79-73-4
(c),that
a
permaneni
Protective
Orde::
be
issued.
Having
heard
the
evidence
presented,
reviewed
thepetition
and
the
record
concerninqr
this
caseand
for
goodcause shown,
IT IS
HEREBY
ORDERED
AND
ADJUGED:
1.
The
Respondent
has knowingly
and
willfuIlyviolated
O.C.c.A.
SS
16-5-90
et
seq.
and
placed
thePetitioner in
reasonable
fear for the Petitioner's safety,
because
Respondent
contacted
thePelitioner
(and
urged
others
to
contact
Petitioner)
and
posted
personal
information
of the
Pet.itioner
for the
purpose
of
harassing
and
intimidating Petitioner.i
As
the
ownerand
operator
of the site,
Respondent
has
the abilityto
remove
posts
.in
his
capacity
as
the moderator.
However,
Respondent
chose
nol lo
remove
posts
that
were
personally
directedat
Ms.
Ellis
and
would
cause
a
reasonable
penson
to
fear for her safety.
Because
the
Respondent's
course
of
conduct
was
directed at
Ms,
Ellis
through
the
posted
messages
and
informalion::elating to
Ms.
EIlis,
and
the
conduct
was
intended
1
Respondent
is
theowner
and
operotor of the
website
ErtortionLetterlnfo-com
(site)
which
wos used
to
stqlk
Ms.
Ellis
by horossing
ond
intimidotinq
her
ond encouragingother
visitors
of the
site
to
do
so
os well.
7
Ellis v.
Chan
su-
13
-DM-
40
9
Permanent
Stalking
Order

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Jeff liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->