ENG 313
- Discussion posts on “Critical Interpretations” of Frost’s “Stopping by Woods…”
1. My first reaction was to say that each analysis was valid, that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but as I read all thevarious examples, I feel like there needs to be structure and guidance to an analysis...otherwise it's just stating your opinionwithout qualifying your statement. Like we discussed, the analysis needs to require students to look past face value.2. I think they can all be considered 'good' as long as there is textual evidence that can be inferred. Sometimes students look at atext and conjure up an analysis that is totally off, and I think this occurs because they do not know how to make good inferencesfrom a text and use text as evidence for an argument….. I think it needs to be contained to the piece of text itself while drawingfrom other resources to inform your analysis – and this is what will separate a ‘good’ from a ‘not so good’ analysis.3. …even though Frost might have a "correct" interpretation of what he was trying to get across, doesn't mean that everyoneelse thinks that same way about the poem…. I don't think that there is such thing as a good or a not so good textual analysis inregards to the interpretation that is being made. What separates the good ones from the not so good ones is the evidence that isused to support whatever it is that you're interpreting.4. In some contexts, I do think there are right and wrong ways to interpret meaning. All of the examples made assertions andmany of them back them up by using Frost's text but some did so in a more convincing and logical manner. I think whatseparates one from another is the way the author supports their assertion. If they give a detailed answer that reinforces theiropinion then I think this is usually good, but if they just make some wild claim and rely on a few frivilous statements then Ithink they leave it pretty weak.5. Each of the interpretations of Frost's poem are true and valid because the author was able to support his claims. Eachinterpretation offered another way that people could connect to the poem. Even if it is not Frost's original intent of the poem, itdoes not matter because someone has found (and supported) another way to connect to it.6. I believe that a critical interpretation has many key components however strong evidence seems to be very important whenthe authors are trying to convey their points. All of the essays that we were to read were very different and made me adjust myperspective on the poem multiple times with clearly articulated critical interpretations.7. Critical analysis is something that in college I have always tried very hard to be good at and it seems the teacher alwaysknows the correct way a poem should be analyzed. Each analysis in this article seemed to have a very different take and each of their voices sounded professional and insightful. But how do we really know if their is a right answer? … It is clearly up tointerpretation, and I think there is nothing wrong with not being certain about the meaning of everything.8. I feel that anything can be considered a critical analysis if given the proper evidence to prove that opinion. If students canprovide meaningful evidence to back up their opinions, then I think that their analysis can be credited as valid. I believe that inorder for each of these examples to be truly authentic, they need to have the proper evidence to back them up.9. …a single poem can have many different interpretations based on differences in experience. So, what makes any of theseinterpretations and textual analyses 'good'? The ability to provide evidence within the text being analyzed, to support theinterpretation….. So does this mean that any analysis can be 'good'? Yes - as long as the interpretation can be proven throughdirect examples in the text.10. While I may not agree with all of these interpretations, if I received these as a teacher, I would not say that they are wrong. Ibelieve that all interpretations are "equal," as long as the student can support their claim.... I think that the biggest thing neededin a textual analysis is evidence and referring back to the text. As long as students provide evidence from the text (and/or fromother sources) to support their argument, and refer back to these things in their paper, I believe that their argument should beconsidered valid.11. In my opinion, not one of these interpretations is better than the other. They all make sense to me, and with enoughevidence and support they could lead to a good textual analysis. I think that a good textual analysis isn't necessarily about"right" interpretation, but that it makes sense and has plenty of evidence from inside and outside of the text itself.12. As I tell my students in placement, if you can back it up with evidence then go ahead and prove it. The same I think goeswith textual analysis. If you can have proof and are able to back something up then it is valid. One student’s opinion might bedifferent from the next student’s opinion, but if they have evidence behind it, it can be made valid. In the examples from theRobert Frost poem, all the examples provide evidence to back up their analysis. I don’t know what I would say if they were all
Leave a Comment