• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Spring Equinox 2008. Volume 13 No. 1
Check out our website at: www.wildlandscpr.org 
Inside…
A Look Down the Trail, by Bethanie Walder. Page 2New Partnerships Bring Funding and Restoration, byBethanie Walder. Pages 3-5Wildlands CPR’s 2007 Annual Report. Pages 6-7DePaving the Way: by Bethanie Walder. Pages 8-9Biblio Notes: Why Didn’t the Bear Cross the Road?, byShannon Donahue. Pages 10-12New Resources. Page 13Odes to Roads: by Ellen Meloy. Pages 14-15Policy Primer: The ABCs of Travel Planning II, by SteveRyder. Pages 16-17Organizational Spotlight: Friends of the Inyo, byCathrine Walters Adams. Pages 18-19Get with the Program: Restoration and TransportationProgram Updates. Pages 20-21Around the Office, Membership Info. Pages 22-23
 New Partnerships Bring  Funding and Restoration to National Forest Watersheds
 By Bethanie Walder 
 Above, in a scene that is emblematic of the urgent need to either storm proof or remove ailing forest roads in the Northwest, runoff from storms in Washington Statein November 2006 buried this entire section of road in debris. Photo courtesy of Gifford Pinchot Task Force. At right, when Nokio Creek flooded in 1999, it took the road with it. Flathead  National Forest, Montana. Photo courtesy of Swan View Coalition.
 
 The Road-RIPorter, Spring Equinox 2008
2
© 2008 Wildlands CPR
Wildlands CPR works to protect and restore wildland ecosystems by preventing and removing roads and limiting motorized recreation. We are a national clearinghouse and network, providing citizens with tools and strategies to fight road construction, deter motorized recreation, and promote road removal and revegetation.
P.O. Box 7516Missoula, MT 59807(406) 543-9551 www.wildlandscpr.org
Director 
Bethanie Walder 
Development Director 
Tom Petersen 
Restoration ProgramCoordinator 
Marnie Criley 
Science Coordinator 
Adam Switalski 
Legal Liaison/Agency Training Coordinator 
Sarah Peters 
Montana State ORV Coordinator 
Adam Rissien 
Utah State ORV Coordinator 
Laurel Hagen 
Program Associates 
Cathrine Walters Adams 
Membership/Web Marketing Associate 
Josh Hurd 
Journal Editor 
Dan Funsch 
Interns & Volunteers 
Mike Fiebig, Andrea Manes, Greg Peters 
Board of Directors 
Amy Atwood, Greg Fishbein, Jim Furnish,William Geer, Chris Kassar, Rebecca Lloyd, Cas- sandra Mosely, Cara Nelson, Brett Paben 
 Economic Stimulus, Restorationand Green Jobs
I
t’s not hard to find positive talk of green jobs these days — even the Presidential can-didates have gotten into the game. It is hard, however, to find mention of restorationin those discussions, at least at the national level. I can’t help but think how nice itwould be if we could bring the concept of restoration into the green jobs discussion, andsee it as a viable path to economic stimulus.Most discussions about green jobs touch on a few themes. First, green-collar jobstend to be concentrated in the energy and climate sectors. Second, the focus is oftenon providing jobs for out-of-work blue-collar workers — shifting the shrinking blue-col-lar field into a growing green-collar field. And third is a recognition that building a greeneconomy will require federal workforce development programs to create a skilled laborpool, in addition to federal tax credits or direct inputs to stimulate private sector invest-ments.That’s where economic stimulus comes in. Unfortunately, much of the recentdiscussion on stimulating the national economy has focused on consumer spendingrather than job creation. The economic stimulus bill that passed Congress in Februarydid not include much for actual job creation, even though some members of Congressargued adamantly for such provisions. Instead, the Congress and President passed astimulus package consisting largely of tax rebates to stimulate spending. We’ve enteredan era where the U.S. economy is profoundly dependent on consumer spending, but thisrequires consumer income, and the only way to create lasting consumer income at thebroad scale is to create more jobs. In reality, a one-time windfall of ~$600 per person isnot likely to stimulate the economy for long, especially when much of the money is likelyto be used to buy cheap goods produced in another country, or to pay off existing debt.Our lawmakers had an opportunity to create new jobs instead of giving peoplerebates. If you look at the jobs and economic benefits that were created, for example,through the Civilian Conservation Corps, it’s incredible. (Never mind the fact that theCCC constructed a lot of roads in national forests and other wild lands.) A far-reaching,comprehensive approach to economic stimulus makes more sense than a quick fix thatmay actually cost more than it benefits.There will likely be future stimulus packages. The two remaining democratic can-didates have both endorsed pending legislation that would provide funding for creatinggreen jobs and helping build green economies. We hope that any future stimulus or greenjob creation packages include watershed restoration as a viable component of thoseprograms. Restoration jobs are high-skill, high-wage, local jobs. If watershed restorationwork is fully funded by public and private interests, including potentially through eco-nomic stimulus, we will see the emergence of a viable, dynamic and exciting new sector ofthe economy.
 
 The Road-RIPorter, Spring Equinox 2008
3
— story continued on next page — 
 W
hen it comes to salmon recovery, removing dams grabs theheadlines, and when it comes to forest health, wildfire andthinning projects are in the spotlight. But there is an intersec-tion between these issues that’s equally important, if not yet consideredfront-page news: reclaiming forest roads. That’s because decaying, unman-aged, under-maintained roads are a top threat to endangered salmon andclean drinking water for thousands of communities, as well as elk, grizzlybears and other wildlife that depend on large blocks of intact habitat tosurvive.These decaying roads are finally getting some of the attention theydeserve. In December, Congress approved and the President signed theOmnibus Appropriations Act of 2008. Tucked inside was a new allocationof $39.4 million for watershed restoration through road decommissioningand remediation on national forest lands — the Legacy Roads and TrailsRemediation Initiative (LRRI). Securing this funding was one of WildlandsCPR’s priority campaigns last year — and it is a huge, welcome victory!So how did this funding come about, and how can we secure morein the future? Like many successful conservation initiatives, passing theLRRI was made possible by identifying common goals, building a diversenetwork, coordinating resources, and finding a champion to lead thecharge. Congressman Norm Dicks (D-WA) provided Congressional leader-ship, backed by the brain trust and footwork of the Washington WatershedRestoration Initiative (WWRI), founded in late 2006. The WWRI includesWashington state officials, Indian tribes of western Washington, WildlandsCPR and about a dozen other conservation groups in Washington, plusother partners throughout the west, all committed to salmon recovery andwatershed restoration. Wildlands CPR joined the WWRI in mid-2007 andhired Sue Gunn to represent us and serve as WWRI Campaign Coordina-tor. We view the Legacy Initiative as the start of a new effort to fund roadremediation work in Washington and beyond.
 The Washington national forest road problem
Back in 2000, the Forest Service and WA Department of Ecology signedan agreement that national forest roads would be subject to state forestpractice standards, as well as those of the federal Clean Water Act. Theyagreed on a timeline: the agency would bring their roads up to standard by2016.Restoring Puget Sound was one the state’s critical concerns. ManyForest Service roads bisect the headwaters of streams that feed the Sound,and water quality in these streams was below standards. The state recog-nized that restoring the Sound would require a real investment to fix theseroad problems. By 2006, however, it had become clear that little progresshad been achieved in meeting this goal.The Forest Service is woefully behind schedule on meeting their agree-ment with the state, in large part due to a lack of funding. Their failureto make significant progress is one of the primary reasons the WWRI was
 New Partnerships Bring Funding and Restoration to National Forest Watersheds
 By Bethanie Walder 
Washington’s November 2006 floods caused severedamage to the 81 road, a paved, major access to Mt. St. Helens. Photo courtesy of Gifford Pinchot Task Force. Problems with forest roads are not confined toWashington State. Here, on the Carson National Forest in New Mexico, oil and gas access roads dominate thelandscape. Photo courtesy of Forest Guardians.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...