• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Inside…
Check out our website at: www.wildlandscpr.org 
 The Quarterly Newsletter of Wildlands Center for Preventing Roads Winter Solstice 2002. Volume 7 # 4
— See article on page 3 — 
Steinacher: Reclaiming a Road and a Culture,by Renée Stauffer. Pages 3-5Odes to Roads: Old Road, BeleagueredWilderness,by Melissa Walker. Pages 6-7Policy Primer: Special Use Recreation Permits,by Lisa Philipps. Pages 8-9Legal Notes: When No Action Is No Excuse, byDan Funsch. Pages 10-11Biblio Notes: The Ecological Impacts ofMountain Biking, by Jason Lathrop.Pages 12-14Activist Spotlight: Cliff Eames. Page 15Depaving the Way: by Bethanie Walder.Page 16-17Get with the Program: ORV and RoadsProgram Updates. Pages 18-19Regional Reports & Updates. Pages 20-21New Resources. Page 22
Steinacher:
Reclaiming a Road and a Culture
 By Renée Stauffer, Karuk Tribe of California
 Reclaiming a road and a culture: the Karuk Tribe has embarked on an ambitious road restoration project in the Steinacher area of northern California. Photo courtesy of the Karuk Tribe.
 
 The Road-RIPorter, Winter Solstice 2002
2
© 2002 Wildlands CPR
Wildlands Center for Preventing Roads works to protect and restore wildland ecosystems by preventing and removing roads and limiting motorized recreation. We are a national clearinghouse and network, providing citizens with tools and strategies to fight road construction, deter motorized recreation, and promote road removal and revegetation.
P.O. Box 7516Missoula, MT 59807(406) 543-9551 WildlandsCPR@wildlandscpr.org www.wildlandscpr.org
Director 
Bethanie Walder 
Development Director 
Tom Petersen 
ORV Policy Coordinator 
Jacob Smith 
Roads Policy Coordinator 
Marnie Criley 
Science Coordinator 
Adam Switalski 
NTWC Grassroots Coordinator 
Lisa Philipps 
Program Associate 
Jennifer Barry 
Newsletter 
Dan Funsch & Jim Coefield 
Interns & Volunteers 
Leslie Hannay, Brooke Hughes, Jason Lathrop,Teresa Walsh 
Board of Directors 
Katie Alvord, Karen Wood DiBari, Dave Havlick,Greg Munther, Cara Nelson, Mary O'Brien,Ted Zukoski 
 Advisory Committe
Jasper Carlton, Dave Foreman,Keith Hammer, Timothy Hermach,Marion Hourdequin, Kraig Klungness, Lorin Lindner, Andy Mahler, Robert McConnell,Stephanie Mills, Reed Noss,Michael Soulé, Steve Trombulak, Louisa Willcox,Bill Willers, Howie Wolke 
 Wildlands Wildlands Wildlands Wildlands Wildlands CCCCCenter for PPPPPreventing  Roads
I
 
read an interesting article on my way home from Washington, DC in late October –about changing demographics and voting in the interior west. The article looked atwhite upper middle-class flight, especially from California, into urban and rural areasin Montana, Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho and other intermountain states. Initial expecta-tions were that the mountain states would become more politically balanced. Instead,the opposite occurred, as wealthier (and fiscally conservative) people moved in andbrought their voting habits with them. The article didn’t go beyond fiscal issues, but Ican’t help but wonder if those same people might not be more environmentally con-cerned than many of the representatives they elect. And if that’s true, then has theconservation community been missing the boat with their nearly exclusive focus onDemocratic candidates and legislators?Once upon a time, Theodore Roosevelt staked out the environmental high groundfor the Republican Party. But the Republicans have moved so far away from environ-mental protection that those with conservation (or other progressive values) can onlybe distraught over an election that gave Republicans full control of Congress. Whilesome issues will remain partisan, it is time to make the environment a bi-partisan ornon-partisan issue again. The partisan politics of national conservation organizationsappear to reinforce the political divide over the environment; it may be more effectiveto de-politicize conservation issues.It is painfully clear that we can’t count on Democrats, or their leaders, to do this.More importantly, we shouldn’t. But we should enlist the voting public to ensure thatRepublicans and Democrats alike will protect the planet. So how can conservationistsreconnect with the Republican Party and make them more responsive to the averageAmerican, who is described in survey after survey as environmentally concerned? Thefirst place may be Republicans for Environmental Protection (REP), a group trying tobring environmental issues back into the mainstream of their party (visit www.rep.org).Perhaps a second step is to look to those American immigrants into the intermountainwest. Conservation organizing could focus on building relationships with those whoshare our values, no matter what party they belong to. Jeb Bush’s rush to protect theenvironment in Florida makes it clear just what an important issue conservation can beto Republicans, if they think their seats depend on it.Another step we can take is to encourage our own members to become moreinvolved in the politics of place — in their own communities. Groups like the Montana-based Center for Environmental Politics (visit www.cfep.org) are doing just this.So what has this got to do with off-road vehicles and roads? Just about everything.While it is imperative that we protect the Arctic Refuge and Rocky Mountain Front fromenergy development, we can also use roads and off-road vehicles as a public rallyingcry. Many polls show that most Americans don’t like off-road vehicles, the advertise-ments that promote them, or the damage they cause. We need to harness this energy atthe grassroots level, with the transplants to the interior west, or with the people mostaffected by off-road vehicle trespass — private property owners. Concurrently, Wild-lands CPR is working with local communities to promote resource-based jobs in wild-land restoration through road removal. Road removal can provide high wage, highskilled jobs in economically depressed resource dependent communities. If the Republi-cans are all about jobs, then let’s help make those jobs restorative instead of extractive.The conservation community’s current tactics and continuing reliance on Demo-crats to protect the environment aren’t working. It’s time for conservatives to think likeconservationists — again.
 By Bethanie Walder 
 
 The Road-RIPorter, Winter Solstice 2002
3
— continued on next page — 
Steinacher:
Reclaiming a Road and a Culture
 By Renée Stauffer, Karuk Tribe of California
 Road decommissioning on the Karuk Reservation beganwith a community commitment to respect ecological valuesand develop sustainable economic solutions. Photo by Amy Chadwick.
 T
raditional sacred hunting and fishing grounds of the KarukTribe once included more than one million acres throughoutthe northwestern region of what is now California. TribalAncestral Lands encompass 4,000 square miles along the mid-Klamathand Salmon Rivers, 95% of which now overlap with the Klamath andSix Rivers National Forests. It is in the heart of this remote region,center of the Karuk’s cultural world, that the Forest Service con-structed the Steinacher road thirty years ago. Originally built toaccess timber, the Steinacher is now the focus of the Karuk Tribe’seffort to revitalize a struggling economy and restore the region’snative fisheries.The Karuk Tribe is the second largest tribe in California, withtribal membership exceeding 3,000. In 1994 they signed a government-to-government protocol agreement to manage the overlap of tribalancestral lands with national forests, and are now working withfederal agencies to implement an ambitious road decommissioningproject.
 Background 
Since the 1850s, the region has been managed primarily forresource extraction, including mining and timber. These activitieshave severely degraded anadromous fish habitat in the MiddleKlamath River, the last major stronghold of summer Steelhead andspring Chinook in the Klamath River basin. These watersheds are inimminent danger due to sedimentation from:
geologically complex, highly fractured metamorphic rock andeasily weathered granitic material on steep topography withhighly erosive soils;
numerous large landslide complexes;
under-maintained and high-density road systems rangingfrom 3.2 to 4.3 miles/sq. mi.;
impaired water quality from upriver agricultural sub-basinsand from reduced forest canopy resulting in high tempera-tures and nutrient loading; and
frequent and widespread wildfires.Dispersed communities depend on the naturalresources of these watersheds for their economicand cultural lives. Unfortunately, however, theeconomy of the mid-Klamath region has beendevastated by the decline of the timber and fishingindustries. There was a 72% decline in timberharvest between 1989 and 1997, ranging from 12billion board feet to 3.5 billion board feet extractedannually. As a result, approximately 1,200 jobs havebeen lost in the region since 1987. Unemploymentis 87% in the Native American community and 67%across the region.The remote rural area makes it difficult torecruit and retain a qualified workforce. TheKlamath National Forest recently lost twentynatural resource positions, while the Six RiversNational Forest lost twenty-seven. As the largestemployer in the mid-Klamath River region, thisdownsizing has a great impact on the localeconomy and the Karuk Tribe.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...